ISR March to Madness thread

Well said and i agree. I think Oregon is the best 7 seed in the tournament and i thought they would be heading into the tournament. Was hoping for Clemson who is an underdog to an average Rutgers team. Clemson is only a 7 because they had a great November/December. Ideally those are the teams i want to play
But Iowa is the best 2 seed in NCAA history and should cake walk to the natty.
Mad Fran and the Progeny live at the arena!
 
No I'm just agreeing with you that Pollard is a very respected and powerful

So you don't have a problem with non conference champs being bumping up 3 or even 4 seed lines higher than their NET, but conference champs shouldn't be seeded higher than their NET?
 
But Iowa is the best 2 seed in NCAA history
Ah. 2nd worst.
tenor.gif
 
Wonder why Iowa didn't get in Baylor's bracket?

Because OSU was the overall #6 seed and since Iowa and OSU can’t be in the Illinois and Michigan brackets, OSU gets Baylor and Iowa gets Gonzaga even tho that isn’t naturally where they would have landed.
 
I didn't know I had a problem with any seed

Then why were you saying a conference champion shouldn’t be seeded better than its NET by 3 or 4 seed lines? If you don’t have a problem with other teams jumping up seed lines over their NET, why the issue with people saying a conference champion should have jump up seed lines over their NET ranking?
 
Then why were you saying a conference champion shouldn’t be seeded better than its NET by 3 or 4 seed lines? If you don’t have a problem with other teams jumping up seed lines over their NET, why the issue with people saying a conference champion should have jump up seed lines over their NET ranking?
I don't think Oregon got a bad seed is all. I think Colorado is better than them
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron