Wrestling: No one cares. Football coaches: Both seemed like home run hires at the time...they didn't work out.
Speak for yourself. There a lot of ISU people that do care about wrestling.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrestling: No one cares. Football coaches: Both seemed like home run hires at the time...they didn't work out.
Like the other guy said, it's wrestling, no one cares, but the mouth breathers.
Speak for yourself. There a lot of ISU people that do care about wrestling.
There are, but it's not a measure by which the AD is judged. Not really. Scandals aside, AD's are hired and fired based on the health of their football and basketball programs. No AD gets fired because the wrestling program isn't performing. Not in 2015.
Your comment on the football coaches is very interesting....considering we just hired a new one two days ago. I just don't think Pollard is very good at evaluating coaching talent. He got the Hoiberg thing right, but any of us could have done that. His quotes about what he was looking for in a coach are essentially the opposite of CPR, whom he himself hired.
He is great for the university, but not at hiring coaches.
You 2 should get a room.You're welcome. Thanks for noticing. I was trying to impress you especially.
Everyone in the country liked both the Chizik hire and the CPR hire.
The fan base was pretty split on Hoiberg, with a lot of people thinking it was the dumbest move in the world. Outside of Ames, there were people literally laughing on the air about us hiring Hoiberg.
Your memory is incorrect, and your insight is insipid.
Paul wasn't a home run hire. I don't think most people (on here at least) even remembered who he was. However, people began to like him pretty quick because of his personality and early success.
Speak for yourself. There a lot of ISU people that do care about wrestling.
This. Wrestling fans get all defensive but it's just not anything any AD is evaluated on. Outside of the local beats covering specific universities there is no coverage. It's not on ESPN, Sports Center doesn't talk about it, there is essentially no national level interest until the NCAA final on Saturday and than it is limited to the handful of schools that are good at it.
I like cross country. I even went out to see the gals run this fall in a meet. That's just me. I used to run. I am interested. I don't expect everyone else to like it because I do. And the AD sure as hell isn't going to be judged to harshly if the x-country team fails.
Your comment on the football coaches is very interesting....considering we just hired a new one two days ago. I just don't think Pollard is very good at evaluating coaching talent. He got the Hoiberg thing right, but any of us could have done that. His quotes about what he was looking for in a coach are essentially the opposite of CPR, whom he himself hired.
He is great for the university, but not at hiring coaches.
Hoiberg was actually a high risk hire since Fred had absolutely ZERO Coaching experience. None. Fred had not even been an assistant. Pollard's hiring of Fred was all about Pollard's evaluation of Fred as a person.
Chizik was considered a home run hire. Rhoads didn't work out long term. But I still do not consider Rhoads to be a mistake. The early years were okay IMO.
Which cnadidate would you have hired instead of Paul Rhoads?
Wrestling is dying and frankly, we are not ever going to get back to an elite level. I'd rather have baseball or hockey to be honest.