Horrible Officiating

[Aduhbolu15]

Refs weren’t the issue today.

 

[Darius Bieber]

If you need all the calls to go your way against a MAC team, you're in trouble.

 

[KremitGreens]

ItS ThE ReFs ThAt mAdE Us bAd

 

[Clonefan32]

YAWWWN.

What a tired excuses.

 

[PickSix]

The officiating definitely sucked, but like others have said, it shouldn't matter when you're a Big 12 team playing the MAC.

 

[cycloneworld]

No shot there's a camera angle that can overrule the guy standing under the goal posts, even if it were reviewable. He's got the best seat in the house.

This. The FG call will get the attention but this staff’s play calling should be picked apart. They lost us the game, not the officials.

 

[atlantacyclone]

It doesn’t appear that we are going bowling anyway… so the call is nothing but window dressing … maybe this loss will bring the team together and turn it around. Unfortunately there is no cure for zero offense…

 

[qwerty]

what the hell is up with our receivers ALWAYS setting up one yard SHORT of first down? happened at least 5 times.

 

[Nococy]

Officiating had nothing to do with us blowing this game.

 

[CycloneRulzzz]

Yeah this is not the game to be making the refs an excuse for losing.

 

[madguy30]

That FG might have been close but was clearly out

No, it wasn't. ISU's got bigger problems and likely would have screwed it up and this thread should be shut down for stupidity by the OP.

But this is bad.

 

[madguy30]

This. The FG call will get the attention but this staff’s play calling should be picked apart. They lost us the game, not the officials.

Not just play calling, just general philosophy.

Sometimes you just have to scrap your plan and do what you can do to get out with a win.

 

[LtRaczack]

Two straight weeks of not getting calls. FG was good and that’s defensive PI all freaking day.

I remember when we died on this hill with CPR in conference games. Now we've raised the standard and are doing it against MAC teams. Yes!!!!!!!!!

 

[Cyhig]

No, it wasn't. ISU's got bigger problems and likely would have screwed it up and this thread should be shut down for stupidity by the OP.

But this is bad.

I believe in college rules, if any part of the ball goes over the goalpost it’s no good. It was tough to see from the angle without being directly underneath the post. But even if the nose of the ball goes over the post while the rest of the ball is inside the post, by rule it’s no good

 

[3TrueFans]

No, it wasn't. ISU's got bigger problems and likely would have screwed it up and this thread should be shut down for stupidity by the OP.

But this is bad.

There's no possible way you can tell from this one still picture at an off angle where the ball actually was when it crossed over the goal posts.

 

[LtRaczack]

Why whine about 2 plays when the other 130 plays were crap?

They were the "two-plays" we needed as part of our complicated equation to win the game which involved doing the same thing for the other 100 plays for over three quarters!!!!

 

[NebrClone]

Two straight weeks of not getting calls. FG was good and that’s defensive PI all freaking day.

Officiating may had some questionable calls, but that is not what cost us this game.

 

[madguy30]

I believe in college rules, if any part of the ball goes over the goalpost it’s no good. It was tough to see from the angle without being directly underneath the post. But even if the nose of the ball goes over the post while the rest of the ball is inside the post, by rule it’s no good

I can't think of a time when I've seen something called no good when it's shading the inside.

 

[madguy30]

There's no possible way you can tell from this one still picture at an off angle where the ball actually was when it crossed over the goal posts.

The ball shading to the inside isn't happening?

 

[Cyhig]

I can't think of a time when I've seen something called no good when it's shading the inside.

Doesn’t matter it it’s shading to the inside. By rule, if the nose of the ball goes over the post, it’s no good.