Hawks NCAA chances

Nothing will cure what's ailing a team faster than a visit from the Big Ten version of the Washington Generals.


I don't see how any one baseball player can be any kind of example of "hard work beats talent".

Eckstein possessed exactly one elite skill: quick, soft hands. He had a very weak arm at shortstop, but he's had a great career because he compensated for that. Damn near nobody gets the ball out of their hands faster than Eckstein. He's one of the least-talented good players in the last 20 years.

Ask any Iowa fan with knowledge of the situation.

You must live in some chicken coop

And I'll recognize these fans on sight? I don't know anyone who has knowledge of the situation, so all I have to go on is your word (and that is pathetically weak). And I live in a chicken coop because I'm unaware of something that happened involving the women's basketball program when I was 4?
 
Eckstein possessed exactly one elite skill: quick, soft hands. He had a very weak arm at shortstop, but he's had a great career because he compensated for that. Damn near nobody gets the ball out of their hands faster than Eckstein. He's one of the least-talented good players in the last 20 years.

Think about what you just said there. It's why baseball is the worst for proving this bad axiom. He could run, catch, throw, and most of all, put the bat on the ball, or he wouldn't have been there.
 
Eckstein possessed exactly one elite skill: quick, soft hands. He had a very weak arm at shortstop, but he's had a great career because he compensated for that. Damn near nobody gets the ball out of their hands faster than Eckstein. He's one of the least-talented good players in the last 20 years.

Think about what you just said there. It's why baseball is the worst for proving this bad axiom. He could run, catch, throw, and most of all, put the bat on the ball, or he wouldn't have been there.

You do realize that the saying doesn't mean the "hard work" crowd has ZERO talent, correct? The more talented player/team can be beaten if their less-talented opponent out works them.

Honestly, this isn't rocket science here.
 
I know man. You can't turn on the TV without seeing all the Wisconsin hype, it's nothing but Jeremy Lin and Wisconsin hype on ESPN.

Seriously, though what the hell are you talking about? How is Wisconsin, the number 15 team in the country, over hyped?

Ok, overrated is probably a more accurate term. They had a nice 6 game winning streak earlier on, however the average margin of victory was about 5-6 against crappy teams. I guess I'm saying they get the benefit of the doubt in terms of ranking because the media loves them...or maybe it's just CBS. Nonetheless, I would not be shocked to see them lose to Iowa tomorrow. I really hope ISU gets placed in their region in the NCAA tournament.
 
Iowa has zero chance to make the NCAAs and very few of the 'experts' even have them in the NIT mix. Not surprising with their poor RPI.
 
Ok, overrated is probably a more accurate term. They had a nice 6 game winning streak earlier on, however the average margin of victory was about 5-6 against crappy teams. I guess I'm saying they get the benefit of the doubt in terms of ranking because the media loves them...or maybe it's just CBS. Nonetheless, I would not be shocked to see them lose to Iowa tomorrow. I really hope ISU gets placed in their region in the NCAA tournament.

Wisconsin is exactly the same as always.

A sure bet tournament team that is almost always gone before weekend #2.
 
How in the **** do you "out work" someone at baseball?

In baseball especially, it refers more to the offseason. Guys who aren't blessed with extraordinary athletic ability/talent can will themselves to become better players than guys who have more natural ability. Like David Eckstein.

But making the hustle plays (diving for ground/fly balls, running out every hit regardless of whether or not it looks like the defensive play will get made, etc.) can also be the difference in helping a less talented team beat a more talented team that doesn't make those plays.

Same goes for basketball. Illinois certainly appears to have lost its will to fight. So while they're more talented than Iowa, the Hawks may very well beat them.
 
In baseball especially, it refers more to the offseason. Guys who aren't blessed with extraordinary athletic ability/talent can will themselves to become better players than guys who have more natural ability. Like David Eckstein.

But making the hustle plays (diving for ground/fly balls, running out every hit regardless of whether or not it looks like the defensive play will get made, etc.) can also be the difference in helping a less talented team beat a more talented team that doesn't make those plays.

Same goes for basketball. Illinois certainly appears to have lost its will to fight. So while they're more talented than Iowa, the Hawks may very well beat them.

Quality example is the 2010 Iowa football team. Had more talent than just about all the teams they played but ended up with a mediocre 8-5 record. As Clayborn said after the Minnesota loss, they "lost their will to win."
 
I don't talk to anyone I work with about Iowa basketball. Actually I don't talk Iowa basketball to any of my friends, either.

You know it's a lie when he mentions watercoolers at work. Unless there's a watercooler in his parents basement, I'm pretty sure he drinks straight from the tap.
 
Quality example is the 2010 Iowa football team. Had more talent than just about all the teams they played but ended up with a mediocre 8-5 record. As Clayborn said after the Minnesota loss, they "lost their will to win."

We've finally arrived full-circle with this nonsense.

"We're great, we just don't play like it".
 
We've finally arrived full-circle with this nonsense.

"We're great, we just don't play like it".

That's not what he said. That team had tons of great talent, but it wasn't a great team. If you're really going to argue that last year's team wasn't loaded with talent, then you may need to have your anti-Black and Gold glasses surgically removed. You could say the same thing for lots of teams/programs; Texas was like that for many years. North Carolina has been like that lately. Clemson too. Any team that's got tons of talent and underachieves.
 
So there's results on the field/floor and fan fantasies.

Is that closer?


North Carolina has two NT's in the last few years and is one of the top half-dozen teams this year and you want to paint them with the underachiver brush?
 
So there's results on the field/floor and fan fantasies.

Is that closer?


North Carolina has two NT's in the last few years and is one of the top half-dozen teams this year and you want to paint them with the underachiver brush?

I was referring to football, although outside of UNC, that underavhiever label does fit the schools I mentioned in basketball, too.

And results in fan fantasies? The 2010 football team should have produced better results on the field; it had more than enough talent. But they didn't, for a few different reasons. But it wasn't a lack of talent.
 
So there's results on the field/floor and fan fantasies.

Is that closer?


North Carolina has two NT's in the last few years and is one of the top half-dozen teams this year and you want to paint them with the underachiver brush?

Fan fantasies? Do you realize how much NFL talent was on that team? The NFL doesn't draft on fan fantasies.
 
I was referring to football, although outside of UNC, that underavhiever label does fit the schools I mentioned in basketball, too.

And results in fan fantasies? The 2010 football team should have produced better results on the field; it had more than enough talent. But they didn't, for a few different reasons. But it wasn't a lack of talent.

What would those be?
 
Fan fantasies? Do you realize how much NFL talent was on that team? The NFL doesn't draft on fan fantasies.
Iowa had alot of NFL caliber players in 2010, yet underachieved

Must of been subpar coaching, correct? what other reason?
 
What would those be?

1. Coaching mistakes (clock management being the chief issue here, but we were outcoached at times, too. Wisky's fake punt springs to mind.).

2. Players giving up (Clayborn's "will to win" comment. And if you watched the Minnesota game last year, you know that's no joke. Iowa looked an awful lot like Illinois' basketball team does now, save for DJK.).

3. The other team made the plays. Persa made a helluva play to beat us, just like their DB made a great play to pick off Stanzi. Terrelle Pryor made the clutch play on 4th down to put the nail in the coffin, etc.
 
1. Coaching mistakes (clock management being the chief issue here, but we were outcoached at times, too. Wisky's fake punt springs to mind.).

2. Players giving up (Clayborn's "will to win" comment. And if you watched the Minnesota game last year, you know that's no joke. Iowa looked an awful lot like Illinois' basketball team does now, save for DJK.).

3. The other team made the plays. Persa made a helluva play to beat us, just like their DB made a great play to pick off Stanzi. Terrelle Pryor made the clutch play on 4th down to put the nail in the coffin, etc.

You do not know that Illinois basketball has given up any more than you know 2010 Iowa football gave up.

Giving up runs contrary to the fight song.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron