I'm a little surprised they found a body. I figured since he was so small that gator wouldn't have left much of him. i'm glad for the family that he was found to give them some closure.
That was my thought as well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a little surprised they found a body. I figured since he was so small that gator wouldn't have left much of him. i'm glad for the family that he was found to give them some closure.
Body not only found, but fully intact as well.
It's just a hotel on the lake, I think probably the most expensive one at the resort, but it's Victorian themed and not really anything to do with animals. The Animal Kingdom Resort would be the one billed as bringing people close to animals.
And the kid wasn't swimming in the water, they were out for a movie night near the beach and the kid was standing near the edge of the water like I'm sure millions of kids have done in the past.
I personally don't see that Disney is all that liable, it's Florida, there's damn near more gators than people in that swampy hell-hole.
(edited) nevermind. found source. http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/15/us/al...sney-florida/index.html?sr=twtsr0615alligator
You don't let alligators do anything, alligators do whatever the **** they want.
According to this last report they were all wading in the water and the kid was in about 1 foot of water. I think this fact would help in Disney's defense.
In my opinion, lawyers will have a field day with this. You have a beach, that leads into a body of water, at a resort geared towards children. You also have signage that basically admits to the water not being safe. I think you could certainly argue with all those factors it becomes incumbent on Disney to owe a little higher duty of care to their patrons than a sign (that a 2 year old kid can't read, of course) saying to stay out of the water.
You must be a Lawyer!
So the gator didn't eat him, hmm.
This quote from the link struck me as odd ""We're going to make certain that we have the alligator that was involved, and that we remove it from the lake," he said."
Perhaps I am, but it doesn't take a law degree to see that Disney set this up as a beach for children, admitted some form of danger, and did nothing to protect the kids from the danger short of putting up some signs.
Yeah, Florida's comparative negligence, so they won't have to pay everything, but they'll be liable for some of it.In my opinion, lawyers will have a field day with this. You have a beach, that leads into a body of water, at a resort geared towards children. You also have signage that basically admits to the water not being safe. I think you could certainly argue with all those factors it becomes incumbent on Disney to owe a little higher duty of care to their patrons than a sign (that a 2 year old kid can't read, of course) saying to stay out of the water.