They gave up 44 points to a first year starter who threw for 5 TDs at home. He’d have thrown for 3000 yards a year in that league.
Fat Stanley without Doyle
- Thread starter CyTwins
- Start date
They gave up 44 points to a first year starter who threw for 5 TDs at home. He’d have thrown for 3000 yards a year in that league.
Iowa gave up 41 points to Jacob Park. He'd have thrown for 4000 yards a year in that league
He's projected to go #11 overall in next year's draft. He's obviously shown something to NFL guys.
Like I said all you do is cherry pick. Stat you don't like, then nobody uses or cares about it. Is the Cy in Cytwins short for cherry picking?
What you are saying is so ridiculous, even your own think so. Kempt > Stanley is just dumb, you know, everyone knows it. Well nevermind, 1976 will back you up on that, and that should tell you everything you need to know.
What stats show Stanley was better than Kempt? Kempt had a large lead in almost every stat. Stanley had a one tenth advantage in yards per attempt and averaged a TD in one less pass. Kempt crushes him everywhere else
#11, wow. Gotta hope CMC doesn't cost him a bunch of money. If he gets picked later than that projected #11, that is all on CMC.
I'm just trying to help you, as you look really stupid with this whole troll. Another fellow ISU fan tried to do the same for you earlier as well. If you like looking like 1976, then keep right on doing what you are doing.
Get a new comeback, that one is getting old and tired. I have yet to see anyone say SOS is all that matters....except you inaccurately accusing almost everyone on this board who is supporting their own team on their own team's board.
I wonder if the ISU fans in this forum could go a whole day without crying about SOS, saying how tough theirs is or how easy someone else is.
"Failed to show it on the field so often" and you go on to cite one game. His numbers last year were exception. He threw for 27 touchdowns. This was all while hurt and having a spotty line.
Yep Stanley was 27-12 in his 39 games as a starter. He also had 3 Bowl wins. Usually people fall back to other stats when they can’t argue about wins a losses. Like it or not that is how QB’s and Coaches are evaluated.
We will see if Purdy gets to Stanley’s level or not.
When Purdy is done either he will have the wins to show for it or he won’t.. My guess is that if he doesn’t you will want to argue everything but wins and losses.
Sure I did. Nate was 27-12 in his first 39 games. If Purdy is better his record will reflect that. I have a feeling you will want to argue anything and everything other than wins and losses though.