Dreaming @ HawkeyeNation

Those hypothetical neutral court matchups with ISU have been replaced with hypothetical Final Four matchups and national championships?
 
Those hypothetical neutral court matchups with ISU have been replaced with hypothetical Final Four matchups and national championships?

'What If's' are fun. Can only imagine how well Iowa would've done if they'd gotten to play a crappy 12 seed in the round of 32 and an overrated 1 seed who couldn't even beat a 10 seed in the sweet 16.
 
Iowa's January team could have easily kept up with either of those teams tonight. I wasn't impressed with unc or nova, especially down the stretch.

Um no. Neither team could have at their peak this season. Both teams run out of talent when facing teams like UNC and Nova.
 
'What If's' are fun. Can only imagine how well Iowa would've done if they'd gotten to play a crappy 12 seed in the round of 32 and an overrated 1 seed who couldn't even beat a 10 seed in the sweet 16.

Well if your conference would of preformed in the tourney, we wouldn't of had to play a crappy 12 seed.
 
I love how you don't understand my bromance with Gonzo

41LEWiXkPRL._SX355_.jpg
 
'What If's' are fun. Can only imagine how well Iowa would've done if they'd gotten to play a crappy 12 seed in the round of 32 and an overrated 1 seed who couldn't even beat a 10 seed in the sweet 16.

That they are.

Since the clearly overrated 5 seed that lost to a 12 seed in the first round and the clearly overrated 2 seed that lost to a 15 seed in the first round accounted for the four best wins of a certain 7 seed's bloated RPI, that 7 seed would have been a 9 seed like it clearly should have been all along. If the overrated 7 seed hadn't had an inflated RPI all season long, it would have had a chance to play a no 1 seed in the round of 32 as a 9 seed and not needed a tip-in to beat a overrated 10-seed that was on almost everyone's last four in prognostications and could've avoided the 2 seed champion. Sure, if the overrated 7 seed was playing as a 9 seed it would've probably gotten throttled just as badly by a 1 seed since it would have drawn the 1 seed in the round of 32, but we're talking semantics at this point. Whether you lose by 19 or 30 or whatever, it's really the same. But like you said, the 'what if' game is fun.
 
That they are.

Since the clearly overrated 5 seed that lost to a 12 seed in the first round and the clearly overrated 2 seed that lost to a 15 seed in the first round accounted for the four best wins of a certain 7 seed's bloated RPI, that 7 seed would have been a 9 seed like it clearly should have been all along. If the overrated 7 seed hadn't had an inflated RPI all season long, it would have had a chance to play a no 1 seed in the round of 32 as a 9 seed and not needed a tip-in to beat a overrated 10-seed that was on almost everyone's last four in prognostications and could've avoided the 2 seed champion. Sure, if the overrated 7 seed was playing as a 9 seed it would've probably gotten throttled just as badly by a 1 seed since it would have drawn the 1 seed in the round of 32, but we're talking semantics at this point. Whether you lose by 19 or 30 or whatever, it's really the same. But like you said, the 'what if' game is fun.


ISU sucks.
 
I guess when you played the BIG 10 basketball (or football) teams last year that Iowa did it was pretty easy to think you were WAAAAAAAYYY better than you actually were. Oh, yeah, I forgot they almost beat a one armed QB in the FB Championship game.
 
'What If's' are fun. Can only imagine how well Iowa would've done if they'd gotten to play a crappy 12 seed in the round of 32 and an overrated 1 seed who couldn't even beat a 10 seed in the sweet 16.

The irony of an Iowa fan complaining about someone else benefiting from playing a weak schedule...
 
I'm really happy to have sold my NCAA Des Moines Regional tickets when Iowa was projecting themselves as a #1 or #2 seed. Hok money was had...sweet.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron