*** COACHING SEARCH THREAD: Sunday, June 7 ***

Status
Not open for further replies.
We are arguing about spilled milk here, but they are still deemed as conference champs, even though it's just for the division.

Either way, it doesn't make much of a difference. 16-0 is 16-0.

In 2013 they won the West Division with a 10-6 record and everyone else in their division was at .500 or lower. Definitely a weaker division. With 3 other teams having better records in the East Division. Murray State did not win the Conference Tourney that year. And yet you were counting that as a Conference Championship. In 2014 pretty much the same thing. And you counted that as a Conference Championship as well.
 
Jeff Goodman ‏@GoodmanESPN 1m1 minute ago Iowa State interviewed several guys this weekend. One name that wasn't mentioned who interviewed, per source: NC Central's LeVelle Moton

I think Moton is a great dude but not a great fit here.

Travis Hines@TravisHines21 5m5 minutes ago
NC Central was 342nd in pace last year. With Underwood and Drew also interviewing, I'm wondering how much style of play is a factor.


Travis Hines@TravisHines21 42s42 seconds ago
Travis Hines retweeted Mike Jones
More importantly, how would players feel about it and adapt?
Travis Hines added,
Mike Jones @MikeWJones@TravisHines21 that royally sucks for fans if we play slow next year




 
In 2013 they won the West Division with a 10-6 record and everyone else in their division was at .500 or lower. Definitely a weaker division. With 3 other teams having better records in the East Division. Murray State did not win the Conference Tourney that year. And yet you were counting that as a Conference Championship. In 2014 pretty much the same thing. And you counted that as a Conference Championship as well.

In 2014 they went 13-3. And it's not ME counting it as a conference championship. It's their conference. I'm done bickering about this and making other people suffer reading through it though. Go Clones!
 
I don't think the "story" will be better, but the basketball can be. And almost all programs do it by hiring a mid-major that has learned how to find and utilize overlooked talent. Perfect.

The last time we hired a mid-major Hilton Magic died. The last time we didn't we went to 4 straight NCAA tournaments. I'm OK with whatever Jaime does, but spare me the risk assessment.
 
I think Moton is a great dude but not a great fit here.

Travis Hines@TravisHines21 5m5 minutes ago
NC Central was 342nd in pace last year. With Underwood and Drew also interviewing, I'm wondering how much style of play is a factor.


Travis Hines@TravisHines21 42s42 seconds ago
Travis Hines retweeted Mike Jones
More importantly, how would players feel about it and adapt?
Travis Hines added,
Mike Jones @MikeWJones@TravisHines21 that royally sucks for fans if we play slow next year


They have good points. I think everyone on here is saying "Well, anybody could make them winners" yes, but what happens when you take a bunch of guys who were brought on to play an up tempo offense and stick them with a coach who only plays slow and methodically? People need to think about these things.
 
The last time we hired a mid-major Hilton Magic died. The last time we didn't we went to 4 straight NCAA tournaments. I'm OK with whatever Jaime does, but spare me the risk assessment.

So basically you think that every mid major coach = Greg McDermott? Seems logical...
 
Any idiot can win with next years team. The true test will be 2016-2017. I hope no matter what the new guy does next year that he doesn't get any sort of raise or extension.

A great result next year will indeed result in the new guy getting a raise. Just to keep him at Iowa State. Knowing JP, we're probably going to underpay him in any case in year 1. And knowing JP, a very good performance (even if it is expected) will then get him a year 2 raise.
 
The last time we hired a mid-major Hilton Magic died. The last time we didn't we went to 4 straight NCAA tournaments. I'm OK with whatever Jaime does, but spare me the risk assessment.

It has nothing to do with this. It's about hiring the right guy period. TJ might be that right guy. Moton might be that right guy. Bryce Drew might be that right guy.
 
A great result next year will indeed result in the new guy getting a raise. Just to keep him at Iowa State. Knowing JP, we're probably going to underpay him in any case in year 1. And knowing JP, a very good performance (even if it is expected) will then get him a year 2 raise.

A raise would be one thing. An extension will be another. No need to give anyone an extension next year.
 
The last time we hired a mid-major Hilton Magic died. The last time we didn't we went to 4 straight NCAA tournaments. I'm OK with whatever Jaime does, but spare me the risk assessment.
Neat. Again, your excitement based-approval means nothing in excusing how illogical your views are.

Will a history lesson work? Probably more likely for you to comprehend.
Hilton died after Johnny. Yet, mid-major TF and LE had more success. Fred was not even a mid-major, and he sure as hell was not a P5, Altman type.
 
Last edited:
The last time we hired a mid-major Hilton Magic died. The last time we didn't we went to 4 straight NCAA tournaments. I'm OK with whatever Jaime does, but spare me the risk assessment.

Hilton has rocked with mid major coaches too. Not every P5 hire will be a Johnny Orr. Not every mid major hire will be a Greg McDermott. Not every inexperienced hire will be a Fred Hoiberg.
 
So basically you think that every mid major coach = Greg McDermott? Seems logical...

And every coach without HCing experience=Fred Hoiberg.

And Otz has more experience than Hoiberg, which makes him better.

Except once you get HCing experience, that goes away. And you are now worse because you aren't like Hoiberg enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LindenCy
Moton has turned the program around at NCCU, he's surely more qualified then Otz. Don't know much about him though, so not sure how he'd fit in here.
 
By your post, the only way we can judge him is based on his recruiting. Let me extend on that a little. Just because someone is decent at recruiting doesn't make them a good head coach. How does that make him qualified to be the HC?

I'm not making the case that it does, but there's not much to pick at except lack of experience. I just have to assume if he gets the job then he's shown that he has a plan that fits Iowa State.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron