Can Someone tell me why...

....if Iowa has such a great defensive scheme (almost invincible judging by the podcasts) doesn't everyone in college football play the same scheme?

I'm no football genius, but I'm tired of hearing that nothing can be done against Iowa's defense. We are just supposed to accept we can hardly score on Iowa. This sounds like excuses to me. Every defense has holes.
These guys usually struggle against mobile quarterbacks.
 
Their defense isn’t great. It’s very good and as a team they almost never make the catastrophic mistake in any phase.

ISU won most snaps. But when three of those snaps you lose are these, you’re probably losing:
Blocked FG
Poor gap discipline leading to a huge tun
Terrible out route combined with a bad QB decision leading to a pick 6


These kind of thoughts are interesting to me. In fact how similar these fans bases are and the things they complain about are shockingly similar.

Iowa st has a stellar Defense, even though we too have fans that live to prey like they don’t. So much so I made a point to tag a couple Iowa St fans on our site to tell them as much. In fact I went as far as lauding their talent. Not Heacock. But their defensive talent!

Based on NFL drafts and free agents sticking I’ve always Pooh poohed the thought we have similar talent, but that defense has NFL talent.

I think too often fans have a tendency to laud a Guru, like Heacock or Parker, when in reality it still takes the players to make it work. They still have to be able to shed blocks and run to the ball.

The guy who mentioned NW had it right. They have out uglied us and out executed us many times. Nothing magic, just outplayed us…

The comment, however, about Iowa State winning most plays, makes no sense whatsoever. If they won most plays, they’d have won. Maybe vs our offense they did but here’s a stat you likely didn’t look out that disproves that immensely.

Iowa ran 49 plays for 235 yds @ 4.79 yds per play.. so if you take off the 59 yard run & the 35 yard pass play like fans love to do when they’re trying to Cherry pick a point. Sure Iowa States Defense outplayed our offense.

But here’s the rub, Iowa State ran 79 plays, 30 more plays than us and had 55 more yards to the tune of 3.67 yards per play!

That’s the winning number… And why we won.

So for most of 49 plays you out performed us, and for the other 79 we outperformed you.

Again it’s about the players and executing your plan. Both teams are hard to get over the top on, every fan ******* about their dumb offensive coaches, so clearly it must be way harder than 90% of our fans, yours, mine, everyone’s thinks!

I don’t mind giving Phil Parker plenty of credit, but quite frankly in my mind, the real credit goes to our defensive recruiting and your defensive recruiting. We have put a **** ton of D backs, and various defensive players in the NFL, yes, including cornerbacks, and yes, plenty of times those CBs turn into safeties, but all the same The talent matters know how matter good the scheme is!

Your defensive talent is very good!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baseline23
NW ran the spread and that is what causes Iowa so much problems. Same as Purdue. Iowa is good against the straight ahead teams.

Well let’s remember we have seemingly played about 50, 10-14 games vs NW so I’m not sure the spread is that meaningful.

As for Purdue, they have a very good offensive minded coach, who always had big armed quarterbacks @ at least 1 NFL caliber receiver, usually 2 and they seem to have our number.

Let’s not pretend like we haven’t had plenty of difficulty with Wisconsin over the years who is about as straightahead as they come… Just between you, me and the fence post. I’m glad as hell they have a new head coach!
 
NW also often had mobile/running QBs. At least a guy that if he saw 7 yards open he would always take it. I’ve been hearing a lot about this “hidden yardage” thing across the CF platform this season. That’s great, but what about the hidden lost yardage? Like a QB with 10 yards of space that chooses to throw an incompletion? A misread on ZR’s? A player falls down with nothing but open field ahead?


I agree with this….when Iowa loses DL gap integrity, like the did vs Utah St or other teams, they have issues. But don’t all teams?
 
The announcers were ripping it hard during the game too

To be fair to the coaches a little here too though, our WR 2 is Jaylin Noel. When you have that little at the position I'm not sure what route trees would work with them. That's not saying it shouldn't be better, but that I can understand at least. That room needs a lot of attention

Dropped balls are murderous!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: VeloClone
Iowa's offense goes 3 & out too much to help their defense. If anything they hang their offense out to dry.

Now they may want to be a ball control offense that bleeds the clock and rests their D but I want to 6'5, 240 lbs with <10% body fat but that doesn't mean it's actually true.

Yes I have struggled with this too…. however, I will say this, and this is how jaded I am about offensive football in the state of Iowa… (See what I did there…LOL) …Because both of ours suck… I often hope for one first down… If we get a first down and get out past the 35 I’m pretty comfortable thats there’s no way in hell they’re going to get a touchdown and maybe not even a field goal .

That’s literally the kind of fan I’ve become, however, I do love defensive football so there’s that!!
 
Yeah. this is spot on and all that really needs to be said here. Iowa State can and has exploited Ferentz's defenses in years past. They need the playmakers for one, which don't appear to be abundant thus far this year, and secondly, they need to run a system that doesn't play right into what Iowa defends best.

Any time Iowa has to play a team willing to spread it out and take medium to deep shots on them, they look a lot more pedestrian. There just aren't a lot of offenses like that in the Big 10, and none at all in the Big 10 West. Then they get to their bowl game and play teams like Georgia Tech and Kentucky, teams that are offensively challenged in ways similar to Big 10 West teams and Iowa State. It is criminal that they consistently get to play teams that are vulnerable at the one thing they are vulnerable defending against.


Any of them…..hmmm
 
The Iowa defense has always been susceptible to two things:

1) getting burned by stud receivers/playmakers because they don't tend to move their best cornerback around.

2) mobile quarterbacks who are better passers than runners. The Dennard Robinson/Adrian Martinez types didn't bother them as much as the guy who was a pretty good passer who could also pick up 10 yards if the protection broke down.


#1 has been the real killer. If you look back at the games where the Iowa defense has been torched it's almost always been one guy doing the ass kicking. Whether it's McCaffery getting matched up on a safety for Stanford, David Bell lighting up the #2 corner.

Pretty much agree with this with a couple caveats…Every team struggles with that, especially a good mobile quarterback, that is a terrific passer… That’s everyone’s kryptonite.

As far as the cornerback… I’m pretty much at peace with whatever Phil Parker wants to do but it is interesting. He rarely switches cornerbacks. Now to be fair both CBS playing in the game usually are eventually going to the NFL, but we have been torched with a third or fourth cornerback with little experience, having to play in that game…

One being Riley Moss, who turned into one hell of a cornerback, got roasted by PU one year.
 
....if Iowa has such a great defensive scheme (almost invincible judging by the podcasts) doesn't everyone in college football play the same scheme?

I'm no football genius, but I'm tired of hearing that nothing can be done against Iowa's defense. We are just supposed to accept we can hardly score on Iowa. This sounds like excuses to me. Every defense has holes.
Because it works against average and below average teams and can be decimated against above average talent and/or teams.

Basically Iowa football just wants to be better than average, but not great. High floor, low ceiling.
 
You just cannot overstate the fact that playing in the Big Least West division has been a huge benefit for EIU. Outside of Wisconsin, there is just not a decent team that EIU has to play on a yearly basis. It's strange division because the supporters can show you that Minnesota, NW and others have had one or two year records of being very good, but overall, it's just a poor division.

I saw a stat today that said over the past X number of years, EIU is 4th in the conference in total victories, one behind Penn. State, what that fact leaves out is the other three teams are in the East and play each other every year, while a team like EIU has played Ohio State once in the last 8 seasons, counting this one. Imagine how much better ISU would be if we missed Oklahoma 7/8 past seasons, and played someone like Kansas or TT those years instead?


Per usual, it’s always more nuanced than that…

1st your 5-5 vs TT the last 10 and we are 2-4 vs PU the last 6…

2nd over the last 10 , it’s actually tOSU ( one of about 3 absolute powers in college Fball) then Wiscy, then Iowa, Then UM, Then MSU, Then PSU!

MSU has been quite poor to at best avg since 2016 when they were 3-9.

The east has 3 teams IU, Maryland and Rutgers that have won 33% of their games since 2013, the west has 2, one of which is PU who we have struggled mightily with and NW who is sub .500 and also struggled mightily with…

Imagine how pissed you’d be if we didn’t have that going against us. We’d have at least 5 more wins…

We also play one of the best out of conference P5 teams (ISU) of the whole league and as it turns out every year.

Yes we have historically not played tOSU much, but we have ACTUALLY played UM, 4 times, 5th was canceled, and PSU 6 , so again…..

Much more to it than the poor old west!

Also UM has scored 27, 42 (I doubt our putrid offense had much to do with that) 10 & 13…

PSU…20, 21, 17, 30, 21 & 41…. I don’t have much issue with our defense versus anybody… On the other hand, our offense fence, everybody lol.
 
Apparently not true
It’s pretty true. They obviously can win against a really good to great team once in a blue moon because many programs can. But they are better than you’re good to average and obviously below average teams because of their defense. 95% of college football is not elite so they are just playing smart where they know they can beat 90-95% of who they play with that defense alone. Then just hope to catch Ohio State like they did a few years ago. Most years they won’t be competitive with Ohio State though.
 
Last edited:
I hate when everyone tries to definitively say THIS is how you beat the defense when the truth is there are multiple ways to beat the defense and both the slow, methodical, 15 play drives can and the spread it out Purdue style can as well.

The problem is we have a young QB, a first time OC, new OLine coach and essentially a whole new offense (even if it is functionally the same the players are all different, and so are the position coaches). So a new offense isn't going to be good and completely disciplined to be super effective at the methodical style. But you also can't switch the style for one game. So it was always going to be rough for our offense.

The other thing, and people have already harped on it enough, is the other way this style can stress the defense is with the QB run. That would force the dline to have to focus on another gap or safeties to play closer which allows more space for the offense to work, plus another option for 4-5 yards to stay ahead of the sticks. But I also understand not stressing a first year QB with that as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cmhawks99
It’s pretty true. They obviously can win against a really good to great team once in a blue moon because many programs can. But they are better than you’re good to average and obviously below average because of their defense. 95% of college football is not elite so they are just playing smart where they know they can beat 90-95% of who they play with that defense alone. Then just hope to catch Ohio State like they did a few years ago. Most years they won’t be competitive with Ohio State though.


Brother there are about 3 super elite teams in the country. One is tOSU and they have only won 2NCs this century and only 2 in 50 years really.

It is super hard to beat any team consistently let alone those teams. I am always very confident when we take the field vs most teams. In particular if we have a pulse on offense.

I focus on NFL talent on your roster at any given time. That’s why I say the Ohio State, Georgias, Alabama’s are way past everyone else, including Michigan or Oklahoma.

There are only 10 to 15 teams in the country that field rosters, more talented than Iowa regularly…I am exceedingly confident in our defense every time they take the field vs anyone if they can move the ball on offense at all and that is what this thread was about.

Our defense…

The offense, not necessarily or even rarely
 
Per usual, it’s always more nuanced than that…

1st your 5-5 vs TT the last 10 and we are 2-4 vs PU the last 6…

2nd over the last 10 , it’s actually tOSU ( one of about 3 absolute powers in college Fball) then Wiscy, then Iowa, Then UM, Then MSU, Then PSU!

MSU has been quite poor to at best avg since 2016 when they were 3-9.

The east has 3 teams IU, Maryland and Rutgers that have won 33% of their games since 2013, the west has 2, one of which is PU who we have struggled mightily with and NW who is sub .500 and also struggled mightily with…

Imagine how pissed you’d be if we didn’t have that going against us. We’d have at least 5 more wins…

We also play one of the best out of conference P5 teams (ISU) of the whole league and as it turns out every year.

Yes we have historically not played tOSU much, but we have ACTUALLY played UM, 4 times, 5th was canceled, and PSU 6 , so again…..

Much more to it than the poor old west!

Also UM has scored 27, 42 (I doubt our putrid offense had much to do with that) 10 & 13…

PSU…20, 21, 17, 30, 21 & 41…. I don’t have much issue with our defense versus anybody… On the other hand, our offense fence, everybody lol.
Its all nuance as you say, but Rutger and Maryland play Michigan, Ohio State and Penn. State every year, that does tend to influence their record a little bit more than playing in the West. Not going to look it up, but it sure seems like EIU has played Rutgers and Maryland a lot more than the three better teams in the east division.

The west has never won a conference championship with the current set up and most have been blow outs. EIU just like 2015 has a very good chance of winning 8 to 10 games while only playing PSU that looks like they are going to be decent. Its the very reason that national media call the school the Fake ID of College Football. Lots of wins beating a group of nobodies.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron