False accusations do not occur as frequently as rapes occur, but they do need to be addressed as the crimes that they are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
UNI guys were even interested in the happenings of Bubu or Yempabou back in Jan....why did you link to a 9 post thread? not much to see there
I think the problem we are having in this thread is that people are viewing things from the extreme ends of the spectrum. Do some rape victims go through many of the struggles above; absolutely and I have seen some of it first hand. Similarly, I have seen people who have had there lives ruined by false allegations. People who have lost their friends, businesses, family only to be "vindicated" later. However, they can never shed the label of sex offender. However both of those examples probably make up less than 10 percent of these cases.
Normally it always starts with "well we were all out drinking......." whether it is coming from the defendant or the alleged victim. Finally, if you believe that rape victims are always presumed liars you live in a different world. In my experience law enforcement, nurses, prosecutors and advocates go out of their way to give every accuser the benefit of the doubt.
I don't see members of Congress referring to other crimes as "legitimate," such as legitimate armed robbery or legitimate murder. An officer told one woman she was "lucky" that she had been assaulted with a knife because she would be believed; she wasn't really feeling lucky.![]()
You're being blinded by your fan hood. The reality of the fact is that Bubu is setting an absolutely terrible precedent for student athletes.
First off, Bubu was never found innocent in a court of law. The case was dropped. I'm going to go out on the obvious limb here and say there is an extremely high chance that Bubu's lawyers first move was to remind the accuser that Bubu in fact is well known locally and plays on a very popular basketball team and her name was about to be run through the mud in a full blown slut shaming. Do to Bubu's standing in the community, people will believe it, mainly because they want to believe it. Bluntly, these people are ******* morons.
Second, he used the court system to fight his way back into a program that he was clearly not wanted in. Every comment that came out of ISU from those that matter in no way hinted that they thought Bubu was in any possible way innocent. They fought hard to keep him away, yet he still managed to keep his scholarship and standing on the team.
Now for his final act, he's turning around and still dragging the girl to court so he can throw her under the bus and attempt to come out completely clean. If she doesn't settle out of court (which would make Bubu look innocent to the unintelligent), she gets to spend her summer getting slut shamed in the Des Moines papers.
How are people not disgusted by this? He is writing the book on how to successfully get out of sexual assault cases for athletes everywhere.
Didn't read your link to ISU student policy. Trying to read between your lines. Maybe I should read the code of conduct because it appears to me you are saying Bubu can be kicked off the team for being the second person in line to have sex with the accuser that evening.The "game" I am playing is the sequence of actions matter. There are things that while morally reprehensible are able meet the threshold for removal of student-athlete yet are difficult to prosecute criminally...particularly when the one making the claim compromises the case. I believe the non-judicial process got it right, the criminal case got it right, and mr palo is wrong headed pursuing a civil case.
Yeah...there are some pretty under-informed people out there no doubt. Everyone knows we have miniature Trons in there with laser guns to shoot the swimmers & prevent pregnancy, dontcha know?wink:
Thanks, now I'm scared of consensual sex.
You mean the timing of it, that which bubu and his attorney didn't raise any concern about?
I'm sure BuBu and his attorney were as shocked as everyone else when Leath reversed the APL decision, especially since Leath had casually sat on the case over the summer while he went to Africa. After all the charge had been dropped by the county attorney, BuBu had returned for the last half of his junior season, and I think it's safe to say everybody or almost everybody thought this case was in the rear view mirror. Then Leath's bombshell.
Well, I am a Hawkeye fan and not blinded. In our country, you are innocent until found guilty. The case was dropped but I highly doubt it was because Bubu's attorneys reminded the alleged victim of anything. It was my understanding the prosecution dropped the charges because of evidence, not because the victim declined to pursue them. His current lawsuit I believe is based partly on the fact that the accuser and her mother fabricated some evidence.
Your second point is ridiculous. After charges were dropped, he came back to the team and I never saw anything about it being a big to do that no one wanted him back. He played one semester after the incident. It was LATER that the ISU president made the decision not to allow him to remain on the team for the following season based on his review of an appeal regarding student conduct that the accuser brought forward to ISU. So as pointed out by others, all rulings were in favor of Bubu EXCEPT for the one by the ISU president and then the BOR backing the president. In fact, it was stated in the media that in January Palo had been found INNOCENT of violating the student code of conduct.
What system would you propose Bubu use to fight the president's decision if he shouldn't use the court system?
Also in this whole mess, everyone has failed to mention the other guy also had charges dropped. Was he also a student and did the accuser make accusations of violation of student code on him? Perhaps he wasn't a student but it would be interesting to know if she went thru the same process with the other guy.
To the comments that he was treated differently than other athletes who commit violations, he actually wasn't. The difference is in this case the accuser went to the school with charges of violation of student conduct. That board or committee or whomever they are found him innocent, so the accuser appealed the decision to the president. My guess with other athletes is that no one took the matter up with ISU.
With the way Title IX is being tossed around, universities could face severe punishment for not throwing the book at the accused in these cases. If the accuser had political connections of any kind, I can see this being a factor contributing to the set of decisions made by Leath and the BoR. I could see the threats to universities in how they handle these cases working against the impartiality of the administrations.
I wonder about the broader implications of Leath's judgment. For example, did his actions keep us off the list of universities being investigated for mishandling rape cases that was in the news a few weeks ago?
In the Irving situation, my guess was that Rhoads and Pollard had the information regarding statements from GF and her mom that they were going to ruin Irving's career. The case was also dropped because of Irving's alibis so perhaps Rhoads and Pollard had that information as well. Have no idea, just speculation but it is probable they had those pieces of information when they decided to let him continue to play.I agree with a lot of what you said, and those that are ripping on BuBu for fighting for what he believes is right would probably be the first to file suit if they thought they were wronged. Technically you're right about BuBu not being treated differently than other athletes who weren't accused of student code violations, though if precedent is set by this case it would seem awfully easy for a mad girlfriend to reek havoc on her athlete boyfriend after they fight or breakup by filing student conduct violation charges with the university. I'm thinking of David Irving whose assault charges were dropped, but if his girlfriend appealed to the university and Leath wants to ignore that, he can. But BuBu in actuality was treated very differently than other athletes in that David Irving was allowed back on the football team "before" his assault charges were even dropped, just the opposite of BuBu. JP and Leath have been linked at the hip on the BuBu situation and do you really think if Leath went to JP and said it would appear far too hypocritical if we let Irving back on the football team, that Irving would have been let back on the football team? Not only was Irving allowed back on the team, but Leath and JP made statements such as "honor before victory" to the press when it came to BuBu. Leath also clearly insinuated to the media that BuBu had done something worse than other athletes that were allowed back on ISU teams, some convicted felons. Technically you're right, but the reality of the situation is that BuBu was treated very differently than other athletes who have got in trouble, and BuBu has never been convicted of anything.
By 2015, Bubu stuff will probably be done.
pretty sure everyone stopped caring on here, till this happened.I hope a resolution comes that quickly. However, there will likely be people arguing about it long after any court decisions come down.