Brackins' Workout

AND he had awesome graphics on the side of his head, too.
If Brackins had this going on... top 10 pick.
1880466.jpeg
 
whatever team he goes to will be my new favorite team. I honestly can't watch the NBA but if craig is in a game I think I could bring myself to watch it
 
I would be the first to admit that Vroman did not have carte blache to shoot fadeaway 3 pointers. Better player all-around and it's not really that close.
 
Gilstrap just said on FB he is going to OKC to workout for the Thunder

Didn't think it was necessary to create a new thread just droppin the info!
 
I would be the first to admit that Vroman did not have carte blache to shoot fadeaway 3 pointers. Better player all-around and it's not really that close.
I believe we have a bitter fan here. Alright, use this as a comparison. Vroman played in an up tempo system which spread the floor. He also had Homan, a very respectable scorer in his own right,on the other block, and a great penetrator and passer in Curtis Stinson. Jake Sullivan could shoot, and Will Blalock could do a little bit of everything. His team was heads and shoulders better. In fact, there was never a time where I remember more than one defender guarding him. And he still took most of his shots on turnaround jumpers. That team had so much more talent, and the system spread the defense. Brackins was allowed to play at the Las Vegas camp in a more open system, and took Stanley Robinson to school. All the scouts were amazed at his ability to mincemeat one of the better college defenders. Vroman never saw two men defending him because of the team he played on. Brackins is much better. It is not even close.
 
And he still took most of his shots on turnaround jumpers.

No, Jackson Vroman did not take most of his shots on turnaround jumpers. Actually, a very, very small percentage of his shoots were turnarounds. People remember them because he looked awkward doing it (and actually was fairly affective at it). He was extremely crafty and smart around the hoop (and on the drive for a big man). Also had very underrated athleticism.
 
No, Jackson Vroman did not take most of his shots on turnaround jumpers. Actually, a very, very small percentage of his shoots were turnarounds. People remember them because he looked awkward doing it (and actually was fairly affective at it). He was extremely crafty and smart around the hoop (and on the drive for a big man). Also had very underrated athleticism.

I won't debate who is a better players, however, when I think about Vroman's game, "crafty" is what comes to mind.
 
I believe we have a bitter fan here. Alright, use this as a comparison. Vroman played in an up tempo system which spread the floor. He also had Homan, a very respectable scorer in his own right,on the other block, and a great penetrator and passer in Curtis Stinson. Jake Sullivan could shoot, and Will Blalock could do a little bit of everything. His team was heads and shoulders better. In fact, there was never a time where I remember more than one defender guarding him. And he still took most of his shots on turnaround jumpers. That team had so much more talent, and the system spread the defense. Brackins was allowed to play at the Las Vegas camp in a more open system, and took Stanley Robinson to school. All the scouts were amazed at his ability to mincemeat one of the better college defenders. Vroman never saw two men defending him because of the team he played on. Brackins is much better. It is not even close.

There is nothing to be bitter about.
We just received the info about the 40" inch vertical. Doesn't it strike you as odd that, no matter what sysyem is run, that a 6' 10" guy with a supposed 40" vertical couldn't just rise up and shoot over anyone in the college game? Especially, considering said player really wanted nothing to do with playing inside. Sorry, I don't buy the great player on a dud team argument. Brackins lacks the strength/quickness to play in the NBA.
 
There is nothing to be bitter about.
We just received the info about the 40" inch vertical. Doesn't it strike you as odd that, no matter what sysyem is run, that a 6' 10" guy with a supposed 40" vertical couldn't just rise up and shoot over anyone in the college game? Especially, considering said player really wanted nothing to do with playing inside. Sorry, I don't buy the great player on a dud team argument. Brackins lacks the strength/quickness to play in the NBA.

You said Brackins won't play a second in the NBA. You're really embarrassing yourself, and most people will probably disregard anything else you say in this thread due to the absurdity of your comments.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron