AND he had awesome graphics on the side of his head, too.I suppose i will give you that. That one dude from Illinois State had the greatest frohawk ever though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AND he had awesome graphics on the side of his head, too.I suppose i will give you that. That one dude from Illinois State had the greatest frohawk ever though.
If Brackins had this going on... top 10 pick.AND he had awesome graphics on the side of his head, too.
There could be a whole marketing campaign around his haircut! :yes:If Brackins had this going on... top 10 pick.
![]()
:no:
Brackins has more height, size, length, athleticism. He has a better handle, better shot, and is a better passer.
So what is Vroman better at?
I believe we have a bitter fan here. Alright, use this as a comparison. Vroman played in an up tempo system which spread the floor. He also had Homan, a very respectable scorer in his own right,on the other block, and a great penetrator and passer in Curtis Stinson. Jake Sullivan could shoot, and Will Blalock could do a little bit of everything. His team was heads and shoulders better. In fact, there was never a time where I remember more than one defender guarding him. And he still took most of his shots on turnaround jumpers. That team had so much more talent, and the system spread the defense. Brackins was allowed to play at the Las Vegas camp in a more open system, and took Stanley Robinson to school. All the scouts were amazed at his ability to mincemeat one of the better college defenders. Vroman never saw two men defending him because of the team he played on. Brackins is much better. It is not even close.I would be the first to admit that Vroman did not have carte blache to shoot fadeaway 3 pointers. Better player all-around and it's not really that close.
And he still took most of his shots on turnaround jumpers.
No, Jackson Vroman did not take most of his shots on turnaround jumpers. Actually, a very, very small percentage of his shoots were turnarounds. People remember them because he looked awkward doing it (and actually was fairly affective at it). He was extremely crafty and smart around the hoop (and on the drive for a big man). Also had very underrated athleticism.
I believe we have a bitter fan here. Alright, use this as a comparison. Vroman played in an up tempo system which spread the floor. He also had Homan, a very respectable scorer in his own right,on the other block, and a great penetrator and passer in Curtis Stinson. Jake Sullivan could shoot, and Will Blalock could do a little bit of everything. His team was heads and shoulders better. In fact, there was never a time where I remember more than one defender guarding him. And he still took most of his shots on turnaround jumpers. That team had so much more talent, and the system spread the defense. Brackins was allowed to play at the Las Vegas camp in a more open system, and took Stanley Robinson to school. All the scouts were amazed at his ability to mincemeat one of the better college defenders. Vroman never saw two men defending him because of the team he played on. Brackins is much better. It is not even close.
There is nothing to be bitter about.
We just received the info about the 40" inch vertical. Doesn't it strike you as odd that, no matter what sysyem is run, that a 6' 10" guy with a supposed 40" vertical couldn't just rise up and shoot over anyone in the college game? Especially, considering said player really wanted nothing to do with playing inside. Sorry, I don't buy the great player on a dud team argument. Brackins lacks the strength/quickness to play in the NBA.