While understanding we are all tired of losing. Go back and look at Baylor's turnaround. I'd say MC and staff have a similarly tall task to what Briles did and we aren't in the middle of TX.
Year 1 - 4-8 with wins vs Northwestern St, Wash St, ISU, aTm
Year 2 - 4-8 with wins vs Wake Forest, Northwestern St, Kent St, and Mizzou
Year 3 - 7-6 with wins were over Sam Houston, Buffalo, Rice, KU, Colorado, KSU, and UT. Lost bowl game. They seemed to only be 7-6 due to a soft schedule that year.
Year 4 - 10-3 - This is when they "arrived" as a program with some real wins over OU, TCU, beating Washington in the Alamo bowl while scoring ridiculous points and RGIII wins the Heisman.
These first 4 years RGIII was the QB.
Year 5 to the end of Briles - a combined record of 40-12. The last 3 years Baylor was 32-7. with 2 conference titles, two 11 wins seasons, one 10 win season, and 2 conference titles.
So it really took 4 years with a Heisman caliber QB and after a slight pull back in year 5, year 6 is when they really had a solid, deep roster capable of competing every Saturday.
Year 1 - 4-8 with wins vs Northwestern St, Wash St, ISU, aTm
Year 2 - 4-8 with wins vs Wake Forest, Northwestern St, Kent St, and Mizzou
Year 3 - 7-6 with wins were over Sam Houston, Buffalo, Rice, KU, Colorado, KSU, and UT. Lost bowl game. They seemed to only be 7-6 due to a soft schedule that year.
Year 4 - 10-3 - This is when they "arrived" as a program with some real wins over OU, TCU, beating Washington in the Alamo bowl while scoring ridiculous points and RGIII wins the Heisman.
These first 4 years RGIII was the QB.
Year 5 to the end of Briles - a combined record of 40-12. The last 3 years Baylor was 32-7. with 2 conference titles, two 11 wins seasons, one 10 win season, and 2 conference titles.
So it really took 4 years with a Heisman caliber QB and after a slight pull back in year 5, year 6 is when they really had a solid, deep roster capable of competing every Saturday.