Available bye week opponents

If Isu and Nebraska are 5-6, then that is the only way to play each other to get into a bowl game. Nebraska could try to reschedule SDSU if they aren’t in the playoffs for another pay day or Akron.

I’m not 100% sure if ISU could play Akron twice. I know there’s a FBS team playing another one twice this year but not sure how that’s counted for bowl wins. Bad news is if the NCAA allowed it the game would be at Akron.

Nebraska is in a better situation to get the game back. Need some more cancellations.
One of Riley's teams was 5-7 and played in a bowl game.
 
Yes, I sure hope so! You plan for the worst.

If 7pm was the best forecast compared to earlier in the day, then fine I understand that reasoning. But now Pollard is using the rain excuse for not playing Sun/Mon. You can play in rain. So he wants us to believe it's going to lightning for 48 straight hours? i just checked and there are forecasted times of no rain or storms, so why isn't he believing that forecast?

I don't care about any fan disappointment. Figure out a way to play the game. Heck, go play in the UNI dome tomorrow if that's an option.

You can't seriously be this dense.....
 
Since 4 other Big 12 teams have a bye on Oct 20 is there any chance we could move our game with one of those teams to Oct 20 to open up more options for getting in a 12th game? Obviously the other team would need to agree and TV would need to be considered (although with half the Big 12 on buy that week TV may like an extra game).

One option could be to move the Texas game from Nov 17 to Oct 20. Since that game is scheduled for LHN the TV considerations would be less of an issue. That would open up Nov 17 for a game with a potential game with Southern (one of the FCS schools that currently only has 10 games scheduled).

Probably not a real option due to the logistics of moving a game.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: chuckd4735
Since 4 other Big 12 teams have a bye on Oct 20 is there any chance we could move our game with one of those teams to Oct 20 to open up more options for getting in a 12th game? Obviously the other team would need to agree and TV would need to be considered (although with half the Big 12 on buy that week TV may like an extra game).

One option could be to move the Texas game from Nov 17 to Oct 20. Since that game is scheduled for LHN the TV considerations would be less of an issue. That would open up Nov 17 for a game with a potential game with Southern (one of the FCS schools that currently only has 10 games scheduled).

Probably not a real option due to the logistics of moving a game.
I could see something like this happening.
 
I’d rather try to find an FCS free win than play Nebraska

1) I don’t want to play Nebraska because they tried to kill the Big 12

2) I want a win I don’t want a toss up that could end in a loss.

3) who would be the home team? Nebby won’t play in Ames and we shouldn’t play in Lincoln.
 
Hypothetical, what if we have another cancellation with a big 12 team with a night game. You would have to make it up somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: khardbored
One of Riley's teams was 5-7 and played in a bowl game.
I remember that was an extraordinary year when some bowl qualifiers were ineligible for various reasons. As I recall, the 5-7 teams won most of their bowl games, too. Didn't watch any of those, but it was testimony that losing teams should not necessarily be punished mercilessly by being banned from even practicing during that time. One on Johnny Major's ISU teams went to a bowl with only 5 wins back in the early 70s when there were only a small number of bowls. I guess the must have passed the "eye test" of the day, but the point is that bowl invites should not be gated by X number of wins alone.
 
One on Johnny Major's ISU teams went to a bowl with only 5 wins back in the early 70s when there were only a small number of bowls. I guess the must have passed the "eye test" of the day

That was when bowl invites were handed out in mid-November, before the regular season was over. ISU accepted an invite with a record of 5-3-1, then lost the last two and the bowl game to finish 5-6-1.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: cycophagus
One on Johnny Major's ISU teams went to a bowl with only 5 wins back in the early 70s when there were only a small number of bowls. I guess the must have passed the "eye test" of the day, but the point is that bowl invites should not be gated by X number of wins alone.

I'm too young to remember that year, but what I've gleaned over the years, bowls were allowed to extend bids prior to the end of the season, and Iowa State got a slot when record was something like 5-2-1 (I think right after the tie w/ Nebraska), but finished regular season 5-5-1. ISU sports historians can elaborate or correct me on that one.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: cycophagus
I've read that we shouldn't pay another team like we are paying South Dakota State as we don't have the money to pay another team. I would easily think the food and drink revenues from the game plus game tickets easily pays any FCS team we bring in. Also, I am sure the local restaurants and businesses would pitch in some donation bucks to get this game played. Plus, a 9-3 ISU record looks a lot more appealing for the Alamo Bowl reps than 8-3 so any lost revenue should pay for itself with a better bowl.
 
Why not? I've heard it done before. Some games were preemptively changed last season with the hurricane. Keeping the fans happy is way below the priority of playing the game, whether people see it or not.
But with a hurricane you have several days warning, and relatively high confidence in the severity and locations impacted. This is midwest thunderstorms which can change in an hour.
 
Nebraska was in the same situation. The Texas Tech at Oklahoma game, maybe 8-9 years ago, which completed ~ 5 am the next day, apparently resulted in limits to these type of delays. It seems straightforward enough to establish some "practice facility rules" that would allow completing a game in an adverse weather situation. For instance, a punt could be a 40 yards position change, but no deeper than the 20 yard line. Other problems easily solved would be the need for players to change shoes from natural turf to field turf, camera angles, and instant replay. These type of things are very low cost in comparison to the value of completing a scheduled event of this magnitude. And it wreaks of common sense.
You can’t change the rules for a specific game. Some of the ideas I’ve seen thrown around about how last night “should have” been handled are so dumb
 
The winner is Hampton. They have a bye on 10/20 and they also need more games because they are an FCS independent. Right now they have nine games scheduled.

Somewhere else on this thread it said these teams have a bye that week
  • Georgia
  • Miami
  • Notre Dame
  • Virginia Tech
  • West Virginia
  • Texas
  • Oklahoma State
  • South Carolina
  • Florida
  • Texas A&M
  • Kansas State
  • Boston College
  • Louisville
  • Northern Illinois
The schedule of these teams is full so it won't be one of them unless there is a future cancellation.

The FCS schools with a bye 10/20 are
  • Austin Peay
  • Chattanooga
  • Colgate
  • Eastern Washington
  • Florida A&M
  • Gardner-Webb
  • Hampton
  • Holy Cross
  • James Madison
  • Kennesaw State
  • Montana
  • Nicholls State
  • Pennsylvania
  • Portland State
  • Prairie View A&M
  • Savannah State
  • Villanova
  • Wagner
  • Yale
I did not review every schedule but it looks like they all have a full schedule, except Hampton.
Maybe we could run up the score to get back at them for beating us at basketball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cyclonz

Help Support Us

Become a patron