Another Female Teacher 'Incident'

Yeah I'm assuming if this rises to the level of a crime there's a whole lot more evidence than what was presented in the Register article.

I knew someone who's child went through something like this and certainly knowing more of the details (and this person was never arrested) made my skin crawl. There was some small town stuff going on (i.e. had to beg the police to look into it).

It seems a lot of folks on here are defending the teacher or "making sure they have enough to arrest." If you look at what they were charged with, the language of the law is: “any sexual conduct with a student to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires of the school employee or the student.” Iowa Code § 709.15(3)(b ).

Seems some are applying standards that are based on their own experiences/thoughts...but if you are not a school employee, you wouldn't be arrested for this...but she sure can be and sounds like some of the initial info they had was enough to look into it. from the complaint:
"We discovered that there was inappropriate contact going back and forth electronically by several different means and then some of that contact really was showing kind of a grooming undertone to it, which raised our concern level and we began to investigate deeper," said St. Jason Hentz, of the West Des Moines Police Department.
 
Not taking either side in this issue. Just making the observation that you better make sure you have extremely strong evidence before you file these charges and ruin a teacher's career and life.

They may indeed have extremely strong evidence, but I didn't see it in the information provided in the article.
Don't disagree about strong evidence, but that isn't the Dowling Catholic's call. It is the Police/DA's call.

This doesn't just apply to Dowling but all school administrators. If they have an inkling of an issue they should involve police. Applies even at the college level. Might have saved Baylor, PSU, ect. a lot of legal issues.
 
Fired? Absolutely. Criminally prosecuted though? The article is kind of purposefully vague so who knows what's in the messages. But when you use words like "flirty" and "innuendo" you're treading on pretty weak criminal ground.
Enticement is a charge. Sounds easy enough already.
 
If she doesn't work again it's compliments of her bad judgement.

The Catholic Church isn't the entity pressing charges. Seems like the police and district attorney feel there is enough evidence.

What would you rather have happened, Dowling Catholic sweep the issue under the table? We have seen how that has worked out.


Wonder if it was a Nunn if it would have been reported or transferred to a school in Eastern Iowa
 
Plenty don't get caught. There are all kinds of stories of students who end up with their teachers not long after graduation, and you'd have to be naive to think something wasn't going on before
You couldn't be more wrong, twenty or thirty years ago, what you are saying was true, but not today. Too many schools have been sued and too many administrators have lost their jobs trying to cover this type of crap.

Today if you are doing this crap, no school is going to turn a blind eye and let you walk away, they are calling the police and they letting them handle it, as they should.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aklineisu
Is the kid trans? I would hate to find out the trans-ness caused the teacher to act inappropriately.
 
The story I read said the teacher admitted to having sexual contact with the student at least 5 times in her classroom, so I'm not sure what you're so arguing about here.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron