There is a huge "current day bias" in this sort of voting. Most people (including me) only refer back to their own personal knowledge and exclude anything prior to that. Having said that, 5 of the 7 were easy for me:
QUOTE]
Don't you think that has something to do with how much more athletic and skilled players are today than they were years ago? I think even if you watch a game played 20 years ago you can see a HUGE difference in the skill of the players on the floor. Marcus Fizer could have scored at will if he played in another era. Do you really think Dean Uthoff is better than Kelvin Cato? To me I think handicapping because a player played in an different era is somewhat against the nature of athletics. This is the kind of thing that makes Nile Kinnick a "better" athlete than Troy Davis, when the truth is anything but.
I agree that the players are much more "athletic" today (overall they are bigger, stronger, faster). The game has changed significantly...evolved actually.
However, I think players of the past were more "skilled". They mastered various shots from all over the floor (including the free throw). They were more fundamentally sound.
Today, the top players (for the most part) are considered top players because they can run, jump and dunk. I also think that today's players have extra moves available to them because they are allowed to both carry the ball and to travel with the ball more than in the past.
To directly answer your question, I don't know who was a better player...Uthoff or Cato. Uthoff was a far superior rebounder and Cato was a far superior shot blocker...they were different players. I feel pretty confident in saying that if either of these guys came back to ISU today (in their college years)...they would both be starting and key contributors.