.
- Thread starter SoapyCy
- Start date
Love Sage, but you can't say Purdy is the best just based on his team's record.... that's dumb.
I didn't say you were trolling about this. Just that you're overselling it. This offense would be way worse with Seneca? The staff that turned Kyle Kempt into a winning quarterback is going to take Seneca and make the offense way worse? This staff puts its quarterbacks in winning situations.
I'm done arguing about Purdy vs. Seneca.
I'm glad we had them both and they are both great ISU QB's. I really don't care if some people think one is better than the other.
But if you are going to argue one way or the other, I think it's best if you've seen both play live and in person several times..... and I have.... so I can at least offer an opinion based on my own eyes. Others may have also seen both play in person and have a different opinion, and that is fine by me. As I said, they are both great and I'm glad they were Cyclones!
I'm glad we had them both and they are both great ISU QB's. I really don't care if some people think one is better than the other.
But if you are going to argue one way or the other, I think it's best if you've seen both play live and in person several times..... and I have.... so I can at least offer an opinion based on my own eyes. Others may have also seen both play in person and have a different opinion, and that is fine by me. As I said, they are both great and I'm glad they were Cyclones!
If you're under the age of 35, please don't bloviate w/ the "Brock is better than Seneca" claim
It's like the "Lebron > MJ" debate.
You have no idea WTF you're talking about
Seneca in 2002> starts 6-1. ranked in the top-10 despite a horrible O-Coordinator.
Oklahoma drill us the next game--and ISU goes 1-6 to finish season w/ loss to Boise St
The last 7 games? The opponent knew EXACTLY our entire offense, every play.
Some of Seneca's WR's in 2002?
Ryan Baum
Todd Miller
Jack Whitver
(not exactly Lazard, Butler, or even Akers)
Seneca would be 9-0 with this team today
period
I’m way past that “over 35” qualification.
A. Brock is better than Seneca.
B. This team would not be 9-0. First because we still would have been dealing with COVID repercussions against UL, second because Brock doesn’t play special teams, defense or left guard.
pardon me if I don’t bloviate, but I just obviated your argument.
QB takes to much credit for W&L's, football is a team game.
if you have a bad QB you have a bad team. Whether you like it or not, that’s how football works now. Good thing we have a good one.
I was at the Florida St game and Iowa game @ Kinnick in 2002 a few rows up from the Iowa bench
Wallace torched Iowa’s d-backs for 400 yards— a defensive backfield with at least 3 future NFL players and others future pros on their defense
most of ISU receivers or tight ends in 2002 wouldn’t of started for UNI
I love Purdy but Wallace was on his own. And Purdy’s coaching staff is light years better
hell Purdy’s tight ends are more talented the last 3 years than the previous 30 years COMBINED
I think it’s more that it is pretty hard to compare a guy that’s played with Breece, Montgomery, Butler, Kolar, etc to the guys Wallace played with. The offense had no other guys that made an NFL roster. The defense had Hobbs as a Soph as the only guy besides Wallace on the roster that got drafted. Not surprising the year after ISU fielded one of its worst team in history.
Carstens wasn’t drafted. Tyson Smith also had a cup of coffee in the league as an undrafted player from the 2002 team. Still no offensive players on the roster that made an NFL team Wallace’s senior season.
Wallace’s Jr year there was Mike Banks, who was a 7th round pick and made the Cards for a couple years.
Don’t care.
I was referring to the fact that Seneca had a solid OL in front of him, and Ennis Haywood running the ball his junior year.
The difference in talent surrounding Seneca and Brock respectively doesn’t account for all of the statistical differences between the two.