2022 Recruiting/Transfer Class

Thought I had to pick one.
The others all bring something unique. We need a point, a shooter and a defender.
Not saying he is bad.
He played starter minutes on a Sweet 16 team… but okay, I guess.
Grill is always going to be best off the bench. He's a spot up shooter, that has length and plays aggressive defense. 3 & D.
Issue is I'm not sure he's consistent enough or versatile enough on offense, and he's not quick enough on defense to be a lock down 1 on 1 defender. Starter level 3 & D is Chris Babb type.
 
So leaving the freshmen out of it - which of Williams / Kalscheur / Green / Grill are not “starter level”?
Grill.

Perhaps Gabe too is his offense is the same and depending on the starters around him. Which is true of many players.

Naz/Thomas/Morris all started some in 2013-14. Without being surrounded by Kane, Ejim, Georges, and Hogue, I don't think they were all starter level that year. What the starter's role is has a big impact on whether they are starter level.

We won't have elite talent imo. Our defense helps offset it to a degree, but to improve we need better starters at many positions. Grill, and ideally Gabe, although losing Hunter makes that harder, and even before that it was a tough sell
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: cyclonehomer
Grill.

Perhaps Gabe too is his offense is the same and depending on the starters around him. Which is true of many players.

Naz/Thomas/Morris all started some in 2013-14. Without being surrounded by Kane, Ejim, Georges, and Hogue, I don't think they were all starter level that year.
You have a bizarre definition of “starter-level”, but whatever. I doubt TJ is recruiting over Grill.
 
You have a bizarre definition of “starter-level”, but whatever. I doubt TJ is recruiting over Grill.
What is your definition? Just if they start on a Big 12 team? I doubt it. I am guessing you have a performance and role criteria. What the team needs from a starter has a big impact on whether a player is a sufficient starter level, do you disagree?

Was Jones a starter level player? He started on a tournament team.

We are recruiting over Jones.

Are we a tournament team if Gabe leaves and we start Williams, AJG, Grill as the backcourt, assuming Gabe is replaced with someone equal to Grill?

We are, and have been trying to recruit over Grill.

What do you call adding Williams when we had Hunter, Gabe, and felt really good about AJG (if you don't believe me, look at who we weren't recruiting).
 
Last edited:
I would hope he is.
I would hope every player is being recruited over if that makes sense. I get that that's not possible, but if you aren't trying to find a better 6th/7th man every offseason I don't know if you're doing your job. It really doesn't have anything to do with that 6th/7th man, either.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isucy86
I would hope every player is being recruited over if that makes sense. I get that that's not possible, but if you aren't trying to find a better 6th/7th man every offseason I don't know if you're doing your job. It really doesn't have anything to do with that 6th/7th man, either.
I mean, you're trying to get better. Next year, when signing seniors. That is going to push guys down in the rotation. Someone has to have a bizarre definition of recruiting over for that not to qualify as such.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: cyclonehomer
I would hope every player is being recruited over if that makes sense. I get that that's not possible, but if you aren't trying to find a better 6th/7th man every offseason I don't know if you're doing your job. It really doesn't have anything to do with that 6th/7th man, either.
It does and grill did nothing to suggest he was a slam dunk player deserving 25 mins+ a game anyway
 
I would hope every player is being recruited over if that makes sense. I get that that's not possible, but if you aren't trying to find a better 6th/7th man every offseason I don't know if you're doing your job. It really doesn't have anything to do with that 6th/7th man, either.
You try to get better which means you even recruit over your best player if that talented of a player commits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cyclonehomer
With losing Hunter, I think we’re prioritizing next year.
Tough to plan/project more than 2 years out now. If player doesn't see enough minutes, they transfer. If player blows up into all-conference, they transfer for $. Teams are almost on a two year cycle now.
 
Going forward it is imperative that the HC must be a helluva recruiter as well as a Coach. Recruiting is even more important now. TJ has a great reputation as a recruiter. He’s found some needed players on the Portal. AJ Green is an absolute must have. Add another PG or CG. Another big man. Pretty decent team.
 
Tough to plan/project more than 2 years out now. If player doesn't see enough minutes, they transfer. If player blows up into all-conference, they transfer for $. Teams are almost on a two year cycle now.
Go look over our rosters the last decade. It’s been tough to plan past two years for a while. It’s why the notion of a long rebuild is bad. TJ still surpassed that, but 2 years has been a long time for a decade. That’s 4 recruiting cycles.

I’d say we’ve gone from 2-year to basically an annual reconstruction of the roster. Not all guys will leave but you reinvent the team each season
 
Going forward it is imperative that the HC must be a helluva recruiter as well as a Coach. Recruiting is even more important now. TJ has a great reputation as a recruiter. He’s found some needed players on the Portal. AJ Green is an absolute must have. Add another PG or CG. Another big man. Pretty decent team.
I actually think that has always been the case. Talent acquisition is the number 1 objective, and TJ has a proven track record. Of course, this year he proved the value of coaching.
The task is now significantly more difficult with the open purchasing of players. If TJ ( and CMC) do not have some caliber of money gun I think we can expect many more recruiting disappointments. Whats the old saying - take a knife to a gunfight?
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron