Pollard has said adamantly that they do not consider storylines when doing the bracket...
Bracketology 2024
- Thread starter CoachHines3
- Start date
Just to put a little more granularity on this since the Committee does...
ISU
Q1a 4-3
Q1b 0-1
Q2a 0-1
Q2b 2-0
Q3 2-0
Q4 9-0
Bama
Q1a 1-5
Q1b 2-1
Q2a 4-1
Q2b 0-0
Q3 5-0
Q4 4-0
Wisky
Q1a 2-3
Q1b 4-2
Q2a 2-1
Q2b 2-1
Q3 1-0
Q4 5-0
As for committee attempting to create storylines in bracketing & matchups ... you can find a good storyline just about anywhere. Extension of coaching trees (e.g., head coach v. former assistant, HC vs. former school), # of historical tournament matchups; former conference mates pre-realignment, high-octane offense vs. stifling-D ... on and on.
Those are just generic examples.
And even if there was some under-table initiative to do it, they certainly wouldn't waste time projecting a storyline past the first round, since it's possible neither or only one team advances.
If a pairing does have intriguing side notes, it's coincidence.
Those are just generic examples.
And even if there was some under-table initiative to do it, they certainly wouldn't waste time projecting a storyline past the first round, since it's possible neither or only one team advances.
If a pairing does have intriguing side notes, it's coincidence.
Being at the same first weekend location doesn't mean you will play each other or even that you will end up in the same regional. And if the Big 12 ends up with more than 4 teams - pretty much a given - there will be more than one Big 12 team in a region. Heck the Big 12 could actually end up with 3 in a region.
Finally remember that ISU and KU have only faced off once this year. The rules now are dependent on how many times teams have met. If only once (where we are now) you can face each other pretty early (3rd round), if twice (if we face KU in the Big 12 Tourney) a little later (regional semifinal), if 3 times (can't happen this year) another round later (regional final).
That depends on who is involved and how they interpret this:
To recognize the demonstrated quality of such teams, the committee shall not place teams seeded on the first five lines at a potential “home-crowd disadvantage” in the second round.
An 11 could face #3 in the second round so they would likely not put Nebraska in Omaha if the #3 was Baylor for example since Nebraska would have the "home-crowd disadvantage" if both teams advanced.
Last edited:
To be fair it is such a HUGE undertaking to make their list of 68 team, seed them, follow all of the bracketing rules and assign them to first weekend locations that I don't think they have a lot of time, energy, or will to then cook in some preferred matchups.
ISU has passed them in metrics, regardless of what a bad bracket guy like Lunardi has.ISU just needs to keep winning and we should pass them pretty easily. Their schedule is really bad the rest of the way.
Only a chance for two more quality wins (IL at home and at Purdue. Both happen in March). Their next 5 games are against non-tourney teams, but some potential land mines (tomorrow at Rutgers and at Iowa).
We still have 6 games against tourney teams left (not counting the Big 12 Tournament). TCU at home, OU at home, BYU at home, Texas Tech at home, at Houston, and at Cincinnati. We win a handful of those and we should vault over Wisconsin
EDIT: "Each of the first four teams selected from a conference shall be placed in different regions if they are seeded on the first four lines."
Last edited:
That rule has been updated as follows: To recognize the demonstrated quality of such teams, the committee shall not place teams seeded on the first four lines at a potential “home-crowd disadvantage” in the first round (i.e. THU/FRI first round games)
I don't know if this was the most current word on this but from their selection and bracketing procedures:
Each of the first three teams selected from a conference shall be placed in different regions.
Can you post a link to that most updated document? I seem to be looking at a dated one (no date on it ironically) but I would like to make sure I am looking at the current one.
TIA
Looks like Lunardi made a mistake this morning, his words, and had us and Baylor flip flopped. He corrected it and now has us as a 3 seed (#12) and Baylor a 4 (#14) fwiw
From March 2023 -- has the whole procedure.
www.ncaa.com
How the field of 68 DI men’s teams is picked for March Madness
The NCAA’s guide to how the 68 teams are chosen, seeded and bracketed for the Division I men's basketball tournament every season.
www.ncaa.com
Yeah the CW hypothetical "would you rather be a 3 in Omaha or a 2 in Spokane?" didn't make sense
No. First Four (11-11), First round (6-11), Second round (3-6)
I used to absolutely think they did those storybook matchups on purpose. But... you know how if you get like 30 people, its more likely than not that 2 will share a birthday? And it seems highly unlikely, but statistically, it actually is MORE likely? I think it is like that.
You're gonna have some coincidental matches from that effect. Especially given the amount of movement and overlap, as 500 said above.