When do you think you will buy a 100% pure electric vehicle?

When will you buy a 100% pure electric vehicle?

  • Already Own One

    Votes: 39 5.5%
  • In the next year

    Votes: 7 1.0%
  • Between 1-5 years

    Votes: 128 18.1%
  • 6-10 years

    Votes: 169 23.9%
  • 10+ years or never

    Votes: 363 51.4%

  • Total voters
    706
Ford has cut the work force in half on the f150 lighting what's that tell you

A fully electric truck always felt like a bad fit at this point.

As a work truck it's a bit of an uphill sales job. Won't win the truck nut crowd.

Plus Ford was taking a beating on them from a profit standpoint. Electrify the Ranger or Maverick. Bail on the Lightening
 
Ford has cut the work force in half on the f150 lighting what's that tell you
Nobody wants to pay 80k+ for one, when that's already approaching Rivian and Cybertruck territory. If they actually made and sold them near MSRP, and dealers weren't marking them up, they'd sell. That's it.

Cheaper EVs from Kia/Hyundai/Tesla are being snatched up all over the place. There is no mythical boycott of all EVs. Ford can't sell Lightnings because they're too damn expensive.

They apparently don't learn from their own evidence, either, since hybrid Mavericks absolutely fly off of lots and orders. Electrify and sell those for cheaper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MattforState
It's a big reason why I laugh off a lot of the hysteria. The opposite of the fearful hysteria is happening here for various reasons as we actually do this stuff in real life right now, not hypothetically in the distant future.
There is some legitimacy in a lot of the hysterical objections. BUT the energy companies, car companies, et al are well aware and working on those problems. It's not like there aren't things that can be done (are being done) to mitigate or resolve them.

e.g. are there enough charging stations now? No. But companies aren't sitting around going "gee whiz we never thought of that and nothing we can do about it!"

It's almost like things change over time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trmaier
There is some legitimacy in a lot of the hysterical objections. BUT the energy companies, car companies, et al are well aware and working on those problems. It's not like there aren't things that can be done (are being done) to mitigate or resolve them.

e.g. are there enough charging stations now? No. But companies aren't sitting around going "gee whiz we never thought of that and nothing we can do about it!"

It's almost like things change over time.
Agree there has to be a tipping point for companies to go all in on infrastructure. If we get to that point business will install charging stations to encourage shopping/eating at their business. It wasn't altruistic HyVee's/Targets have in store Starbucks or other coffee shops. It gives customers another reason to shop there.

Same goes for large businesses (aka investment in fitness centers) and municipality downtowns with on-street paid parking chargers. And at some point convenience stores will evolve to add charging stations. Maybe less convenience and more right priced everyday needs. I feel Qwik Star is positioned well by marketing food staples.

The other barrier is technology. It should help with more companies moving to the Tesla style charging port. Also Toyota keeps talking solid state batteries- my guess is they would use existing charging stations, but maybe not.

I also feel, in some geographic areas, businesses would ideally charge the charging stations using renewable power or another new source like hydrogen instead of the grid. So for the required investment, it probably makes sense to wait a couple years and let panel and mechanicals prices to come down. Especially if they will be 15-25 year assets/investments. Being first in, isn't always a winning solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: trmaier
It says they need to shift workers to the Bronco and Ranger production lines if you read more than just the headline.
They are shifting the labor because Lightning sales are lagging projections, although up 50% Y-O-Y. Sounds like Ford bumped Lightning production last summer to 3 shifts, but sales didn't materialize.

Ford has dropped Lightning production to 1 shift and is transferring workers to other jobs. Specifically, Ford is projecting strong demand for more profitable Ranger & Bronco lines based sales bump for a re-tooled Ranger.

Sounds like a good use of labor resources to meet short-term demand and maximize profitability. And Ford was probably restricted based on UAW agreement signed last November.

Ford Lightning Labor Reduction
 
Nobody wants to pay 80k+ for one, when that's already approaching Rivian and Cybertruck territory. If they actually made and sold them near MSRP, and dealers weren't marking them up, they'd sell. That's it.

Cheaper EVs from Kia/Hyundai/Tesla are being snatched up all over the place. There is no mythical boycott of all EVs. Ford can't sell Lightnings because they're too damn expensive.

They apparently don't learn from their own evidence, either, since hybrid Mavericks absolutely fly off of lots and orders. Electrify and sell those for cheaper.

This, like this Motor Trend articles opines, is on Ford. They much ballyhooed a $42K price but jumped that again and again. My cousin got one of the first at a decent price plus a big rebate. Seems like they think they can rest on their loreals and win out on the F-series reputation and loyalty while Dodge comes out this year with their (via an option) 500 mile range E pickup.


BTW, cousin in small town Iowa LOVES his. Sort of an E car beta guy, he has the Mustang AND the Lightning both. Not a lot of those paired up in towns of 1000 in rural Iowa.
 
Years ago, in small town Iowa, we were tearing up the linoleum in the house next door and found the padding underneath was old newspaper. Some were in good condition so saved some pages from them including a 1913 Chicago Daily Tribune. Thought some here might find this ad interesting in lieu of the electric cars comeback. BTW, some cool ads for motorcycle and cars and one for Walter Johnson hawking Coca-Cola as a sport drink.

89942218_10216492799380082_2839872482519810048_n.jpg


89863521_10216492795259979_7598475571068141568_n.jpg
 
BTW, cousin in small town Iowa LOVES his. Sort of an E car beta guy, he has the Mustang AND the Lightning both. Not a lot of those paired up in towns of 1000 in rural Iowa.

Assuming he has a garage it must be incredible to never have to go to a gas station in the horrible weather while also having a great AWD vehicle for the snow/ice.

I hate going to get gas living in permanent sunny and 70, let alone getting out to pump the past few weeks in Iowa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wxman1 and dmclone
Our cars are packed with dozens of sensors and endless lines of computer code. Combine that with the rising cost of replacement parts and repairs, and voila — soaring auto insurance rates.

Look at these numbers from Bloomberg, which suggests EVs are part of what’s driving costs. For a gas car, the average repair bill is around $4,437; the average for an electric vehicle, on the other hand, is $6,618.

No wonder the average collision insurance claim jumped 64% between 2018 and 2022. In 2023, auto insurance rates climbed 20%, the biggest increase since 1976.

The upgrades also mean a front-end collision repair is 43% more expensive. It’s not just driver-assist jacking up costs.
  • Lots of new cars have LED headlights, which cost around five times more than halogen lights to replace.
  • New cars contain more aluminum. Compared to steel, aluminum is lighter, provides better gas mileage and offers more protection in a crash — but it’s harder to fix and more expensive, too.
  • EVs take 20 days on average to repair. That's 40% longer than traditional vehicles and $500 more expensive for labor.
 
Don't forget your tax credits this year. Not only did I receive a $7,500 credit, I also received $878 by installing a home charger. "Energy-Efficient Vehicle Charging Station" Form 8911.
 
Nobody wants to pay 80k+ for one, when that's already approaching Rivian and Cybertruck territory. If they actually made and sold them near MSRP, and dealers weren't marking them up, they'd sell. That's it.

Cheaper EVs from Kia/Hyundai/Tesla are being snatched up all over the place. There is no mythical boycott of all EVs. Ford can't sell Lightnings because they're too damn expensive.

They apparently don't learn from their own evidence, either, since hybrid Mavericks absolutely fly off of lots and orders. Electrify and sell those for cheaper.
Wait...........dealers are marking them up and can't sell them????? That makes zero sense. Vehicles are only marked up if they do sell, dealerships are not a non-profit, they are going to price them to sell. I think you are way off if you think dealers are marking up vehicles when they can't sell them.
 
Our cars are packed with dozens of sensors and endless lines of computer code. Combine that with the rising cost of replacement parts and repairs, and voila — soaring auto insurance rates.

Look at these numbers from Bloomberg, which suggests EVs are part of what’s driving costs. For a gas car, the average repair bill is around $4,437; the average for an electric vehicle, on the other hand, is $6,618.

No wonder the average collision insurance claim jumped 64% between 2018 and 2022. In 2023, auto insurance rates climbed 20%, the biggest increase since 1976.

The upgrades also mean a front-end collision repair is 43% more expensive. It’s not just driver-assist jacking up costs.
  • Lots of new cars have LED headlights, which cost around five times more than halogen lights to replace.
  • New cars contain more aluminum. Compared to steel, aluminum is lighter, provides better gas mileage and offers more protection in a crash — but it’s harder to fix and more expensive, too.
  • EVs take 20 days on average to repair. That's 40% longer than traditional vehicles and $500 more expensive for labor.
I was talking to a repair shop about the aluminum bodies on ford pickups. They mentioned that you don't have to worry about rust as much, then brought up that some small accidents that would not cause more than just a dinged bumper will make the aluminum funky and need replacement. It made me rethink aluminum on pickups.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: NWICY

Was wondering about the size/weight of all of the pickups and SUVS when those vehicles changed everything. They do mention it:

The facility has seen this problem before. In the 1990s, as more people began buying light-weight pickups and sport utility vehicles, the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility found that the then-50-year-old guardrail system was proving inadequate to handle their extra weight. So, it went about redesigning guardrails to adapt.​
“At the time, lightweight pickups made up 10-to-15% of the vehicle fleet,” Stolle said. “Now, more than 50% of vehicles on the road are pickups and SUVs.”​

Used to design parking lots some right after graduation. Was about the time parking stalls were sized for 1959 Buick Electra's and other large boats. The temptation in the 1970's and 1980's with all of the smaller import cars was to cheat back stall sizes which some did. Than it became a world of yuge pickups and Mt. Vesuvius SUVs and everything seemed to small again.
 
Last edited:
Wait...........dealers are marking them up and can't sell them????? That makes zero sense. Vehicles are only marked up if they do sell, dealerships are not a non-profit, they are going to price them to sell. I think you are way off if you think dealers are marking up vehicles when they can't sell them.
They're pricing the damn things based on perceived demand, as well as trying to double-dip on baking the EV tax credit into the sale price. Dealers have almost 0 inventory of them, since Ford barely produces them, so when they do obtain one -- price is sky high on the lot. On top of Ford just straight up raising the MSRPs. It's not the $40K-ish truck that was initially promised and advertised.


Then they cut back production of them and blame the lack of sales on "minimal interest in EVs" when that couldn't possibly be farther from the truth. Their EV truck costs too much to make sense to buy. Lightning sales were dropping heavily towards the end of 2023, meanwhile, R1T sales were skyrocketing. It doesn't get more clear than that. Ford is pricing like a luxury product and trying to sell it to consumers not in that market.
 
They're pricing the damn things based on perceived demand, as well as trying to double-dip on baking the EV tax credit into the sale price. Dealers have almost 0 inventory of them, since Ford barely produces them, so when they do obtain one -- price is sky high on the lot. On top of Ford just straight up raising the MSRPs. It's not the $40K-ish truck that was initially promised and advertised.


Then they cut back production of them and blame the lack of sales on "minimal interest in EVs" when that couldn't possibly be farther from the truth. Their EV truck costs too much to make sense to buy. Lightning sales were dropping heavily towards the end of 2023, meanwhile, R1T sales were skyrocketing. It doesn't get more clear than that. Ford is pricing like a luxury product and trying to sell it to consumers not in that market.

Your take is pretty much in line with the car magazine types who make their living writing about this stuff. Ford might have blown the jump start they seemed to have an inside track to and could have owned that market. My cousin is pretty happy he got one of the first before they priced them out of range. Dodge looks to be prepping for a hard charge into the E pickup segment. Will serve Ford right if they get beat out. They promised a baseline pickup and reigned halfway in. Probably equal parts misread of their market with a hefty dose of good old fashioned Detroit greed.
 
Your take is pretty much in line with the car magazine types who make their living writing about this stuff. Ford might have blown the jump start they seemed to have an inside track to and could have owned that market. My cousin is pretty happy he got one of the first before they priced them out of range. Dodge looks to be prepping for a hard charge into the E pickup segment. Will serve Ford right if they get beat out. They promised a baseline pickup and reigned halfway in. Probably equal parts misread of their market with a hefty dose of good old fashioned Detroit greed.
I'm very interested in the non-Ford, non-luxury offerings coming from other makes just for this reason. I genuinely want to know if it's a "normal people just don't want EV trucks" problem, or if it's "this truck is way too expensive when this alternative at a similar price is better". I think it's the latter, and that's evidenced by the sales of those more-expensive EV trucks compared to the Lightning, as well as the sales data for non-truck EVs. I don't see an "EV" problem here - I see a dollars problem specifically for Ford, that it seemed they brought upon themselves (and then try to blame consumers for). I could be completely off-base. Time will tell.

It's crazy to me that they're all trying this directly at the top of the food chain instead of in lower price brackets. Where is the glut of CUV EVs? CUVs sell like hotcakes. GM is starting to put out a few, but that's about it. We have sedan EVs selling well. Where is the small truck EV? The Mavericks, the Coloradoes, the Santa Cruzes. I'd also then ask most of the same questions regarding PHEVs, although you can find those coming in some CUVs now. I've mentioned before how dumb it is to me that we just entirely skipped the hybrid phases for most vehicle types.
 
They're pricing the damn things based on perceived demand, as well as trying to double-dip on baking the EV tax credit into the sale price. Dealers have almost 0 inventory of them, since Ford barely produces them, so when they do obtain one -- price is sky high on the lot. On top of Ford just straight up raising the MSRPs. It's not the $40K-ish truck that was initially promised and advertised.


Then they cut back production of them and blame the lack of sales on "minimal interest in EVs" when that couldn't possibly be farther from the truth. Their EV truck costs too much to make sense to buy. Lightning sales were dropping heavily towards the end of 2023, meanwhile, R1T sales were skyrocketing. It doesn't get more clear than that. Ford is pricing like a luxury product and trying to sell it to consumers not in that market.
So they are making them and selling what is made. The post I responded to you made the argument that they didn’t sell because of the markup. Don’t blame the dealer if they are selling them what people are willing to pay for them.
 
So they are making them and selling what is made. The post I responded to you made the argument that they didn’t sell because of the markup. Don’t blame the dealer if they are selling them what people are willing to pay for them.
They're selling too few of them and blaming that as a demand issue. That's what Ford says, but the stats don't back that up. There's plenty of demand for EVs, and plenty of demand for EV trucks -- such as Rivian outselling them straight up.

If they want to sell more, they need to be priced lower. All they're doing now is artificially keeping the supply low, keeping the sale prices high, and claiming demand is poor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: herbicide

Help Support Us

Become a patron