If you truly wanted to see the BEST 4 CFB teams in the playoff, FSU would not be in it.
Should be:
PAC Champ
SEC Champ Georgia (NO to Alabama)
Big XII Champ Texas
B1G Champ Michigan, or OSU (in your scenario of a crazy Michigan loss to Iowa)
Those are the best teams in the land and would make the best playoff scenario.
Am tired of watching CFP semifinal games that have an average margin of victory of 20 points.
Your “best” may not be the committee’s “best,” or anyone else’s “best.” That’s why we should limit the amount of human bias applied to the selections (I’m looking at you, committee) and have more objective qualifying criteria.
You win all your games in a P5 conference? That’s criteria number one.
You win the title of a P5 conference, with 1 loss or fewer? That’s criteria number two.
If that doesn’t get you four, or if you’re left with more than four, then you can start applying other measurements like head to head (hello, Texas), strength of schedule or whatnot. This “eye test” garbage or “we think team A would beat team B on a neutral field” or “this undefeated record doesn’t count because a starter went down” just introduces too much bias and tipping of the scales. I want
less of that, not more … the notion of “we must have the four best teams“ automatically implies
whose four best, which is not an objectively provable criteria.
I guess I lean more toward “deserving” than “best,” as you can set up criteria to measure that better … and in no world with four (or more) undefeated or one-loss conference champions should Ohio State be considered. Again, my opinion, but they couldn’t even win their
division, why should they think they get a shot at best in the
country?