F*CK IOWA

None of us have contacts, this is a message board, where we are free to express our opinion, just because you disagree with an opinion does not make your more valid and you have to attack the person saying it.

How about you step out on the sidelines a few years, and come back and tell us all how to do it, instead of sitting there on your computer trying to be an expert on everything?
Whatever you say, Coach!
 
Just a point of order, it's already a dead ball after it is kicked. A punt is not a live ball until it's touched by the receiving team. That's why there are special rules, like the one in question in the Iowa game. A player can't be deceptive with their intentions on whether or not they're going to fair catch it. I don't know if that changes your argument or not, but it's a dead ball right up until it's touched by the receiving team.

That's absolutely incorrect, the part about it being a dead ball after it's kicked.

ARTICLE 1. A live ball is a ball in play. A pass, kick or fumble that has not yet touched the ground is a live ball in flight.

BUT, you're completely correct concerning the return player not being allowed to in any way be deceptive about their intentions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sevey
Correct but the current rule allows the deception to exist and makes it a judgement call. If everyone on the punting team going down the field knows the ball can be returned unless the hand is above his head, it eliminates any and all deceptions. That should be the goal of the rule change, you want protection, hold up your hand, otherwise its a free ball.

Almost every call in football is a judgement call - Holding, PI, FG that goes right over the goal post, targeting, etc., etc.

Wave your hand above your head = valid fair catch, cant advance the ball

Wave your hand in any other manner than above your head = INvalid fair catch and still can't advance the ball.

Iowa did #2 above and then tried to advance the ball.

The only thing that would have made that play better is if someone blew up (and I mean absolutely annihilated him) the Iowa returner after he tried to run with the ball.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: flycy and 2speedy1
Those people have to make that determination now as they run down the field, if they hit the returner or do not give his room to catch the punt it's a penalty.
No kidding they have to make that judgement, but with the way the rule is written now they know if they see a hand waiving in any way they let up and won't obliterate the returner. If you had it your way they see a hand waiving and they can't tell if it's above or below the head what are they supposed to do? If I'm their coach I tell them to blow him up if you're not sure because worst case it's a 15 yard penalty, where as if you pull up and the hand wasn't above the head it could be a touchdown return.
 
Apparently the Big 10 will drop the hammer on Iowa on Wednesday. Drunk Tavern Hoks throwing bottles at the visitors bench is just outrageous. But they will probably complain about getting fined, because somehow it’s their right, they paid for the ticket. Pathetic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JayV and flycy
Just in case you’re wondering how eastern Iowa is handling the replay decision even now on Monday morning, there are three - three! - articles in the Gazette highlighting the call. And still referring to it as a “penalty” when that’s not at all what it was.

View attachment 118340View attachment 118341View attachment 118342
I had no idea the Gazette had 3 original articles per day, total, much less just sports.
Last time i picked one up it was mostly syndicated national stuff picked off the wire.
 
Those people have to make that determination now as they run down the field, if they hit the returner or do not give his room to catch the punt it's a penalty.

And any kind of a wave tells them to slow/stop which is easier than trying to figure out if it's above a certain location on the body.

Otherwise a coach could throw a ringer in there to destroy a star player and have them play the 'I thought it was below the head' card.
 
You do not have to review it, because the near official is going to blow the play dead the moment the ball is caught or if its bounces when it is controlled by the kicking team. No whistle it's a live play.

A rule like this makes it easier for the officials, his job is to look at the returner and see if he is signally for a fair catch, once he sees the hand above the head, he is blowing his whistle on the catch.
SCORE MORE THAN 1O POINTS. PUT UP MORE THAN 125 YARDS IN A GAME. And then you can complain. You still only had to move the ball 25 yards to kick a winning field goal! Iowa has been on the opposite side of 95 percent of these calls that swing games for most of Kirks career. Luckiest, most overrated, Fake ID football program in America has one call that goes against them and the world is ending.
 
SCORE MORE THAN 1O POINTS. PUT UP MORE THAN 125 YARDS IN A GAME. And then you can complain. You still only had to move the ball 25 yards to kick a winning field goal! Iowa has been on the opposite side of 95 percent of these calls that swing games for most of Kirks career. Luckiest, most overrated, Fake ID football program in America has one call that goes against them and the world is ending.

They could have had 500 yards and 42 points, that play still should get called back.
 
And any kind of a wave tells them to slow/stop which is easier than trying to figure out if it's above a certain location on the body.

Otherwise a coach could throw a ringer in there to destroy a star player and have them play the 'I thought it was below the head' card.

See Fresno State before the "halo" rule was implemented. They'd send guys down to blow up the returner before the ball even got to him.
 
That's absolutely incorrect, the part about it being a dead ball after it's kicked.

ARTICLE 1. A live ball is a ball in play. A pass, kick or fumble that has not yet touched the ground is a live ball in flight.

BUT, you're completely correct concerning the return player not being allowed to in any way be deceptive about their intentions.
No it isn't a live ball. Not until it's touched by the return team. Here's how you can tell. During a punt, if the receiving team doesn't call for a fair catch and doesn't make an attempt to field the ball, can the kicking team take possession?
Nope. They can only down it, ergo it's a dead ball. On a kickoff the kicking team can take possession of the ball (provided it travels more than 10 yards) without the receiving team having touched it. That's a live ball. A punt is not.
 
That's absolutely incorrect, the part about it being a dead ball after it's kicked.

ARTICLE 1. A live ball is a ball in play. A pass, kick or fumble that has not yet touched the ground is a live ball in flight.

BUT, you're completely correct concerning the return player not being allowed to in any way be deceptive about their intentions.

Kick and Punt are 2 different things in football rules.
 
That's absolutely incorrect, the part about it being a dead ball after it's kicked.

ARTICLE 1. A live ball is a ball in play. A pass, kick or fumble that has not yet touched the ground is a live ball in flight.

BUT, you're completely correct concerning the return player not being allowed to in any way be deceptive about their intentions.
It doesn't mention a punt.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: MJ29 and isufbcurt
No it isn't a live ball. Not until it's touched by the return team. Here's how you can tell. During a punt, if the receiving team doesn't call for a fair catch and doesn't make an attempt to field the ball, can the kicking team take possession?
Nope. They can only down it, ergo it's a dead ball. On a kickoff the kicking team can take possession of the ball (provided it travels more than 10 yards) without the receiving team having touched it. That's a live ball. A punt is not.

A punt is live. That's why the rules about illegal touching and recovery by the kicking team use the phrase "the ball becomes dead."
 
  • Winner
Reactions: SEIOWA CLONE

Help Support Us

Become a patron