Game Thoughts: UNI

Clanton is going to need a couple of seasons to go out and get his type of players, right now he is working with what he was dealt by the former coach. The guy has done a great job of finding talent that was overlooked by bigger schools and placed two of them in the NFL as fairly high draft picks. Until he shows us, he cannot turn it around I have confidence in him, if he is not successful, then no one can develop a line at ISU.
His walk the field interview was very humble. He gave credit to those lineman's desire and work ethic. He says it takes the right personality to be self motivated to the level those two were. So, he's going to have to be able to recruit those personalities.
 
These WR screens are ONLY for an elite QB. It is too easy for the young QB to have in his mind to hurry the throw, without looking and assessing the D. An easy INT or the unintended backward pass (as we saw yesterday) has bobble/pick 6 written all over it.
Good blocking relievers too. We don't have Lazard or Butler knocking corners and safeties on their butts. You're right. Too many things can go wrong with that play. Not worth the gamble as little as we've ever gotten out of it. We did seem to go deep with a few passes against UNI and hope that trend continues. Couple passes were just off that would have been big.
 
FSU just ran a play I wish ISU would run sometimes. They have been throwing a lot of WR screens like we do, but on this play, the wr that was the blocker went down the field, broke down like to stock block the Dback, and then kicked it in gear and was wide open for a TD. Stops the DB's from flying up to make the tackle and puts the WR catching the ball one on one with a DB.

You'll see that from us.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: SEIOWA CLONE
He's had a full offseason to work with what's there. We pretty much know Clanton isn't he problem. That leads me to believe we are a bit short in the talent/development department. It's possible some of the really young guys make strides but it just feels like we don't have talent in the room, which was maybe the biggest part of the problem to begin with.

If you are going up against UNI and struggle to control the line of scrimmage it DOES NOT BODE well for the season. Believe it or not there is a lot of precedent here.

Sorry, but I'm not buying the optimism on this unit (this year). I will be giddy if that's proven to be (hopefully wildly) incorrect.
How the OL plays against UNI is not a clear indication of how good they are. ISU has always struggled running against UNI. As I recall Iowa and Wisconsin had a lot of trouble running against UNI. Not saying they will be good, but I think we need to see a couple more games before we give up on them. Have their best guy back would help a lot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: isutrevman
How the OL plays against UNI is not a clear indication of how good they are. ISU has always struggled running against UNI. As I recall Iowa and Wisconsin had a lot of trouble running against UNI. Not saying they will be good, but I think we need to see a couple more games before we give up on them. Have their best guy back would help a lot.
UNI's dline is smaller but quicker than the dlines we normally face. They try to leverage this by doing lots of stunts, twists, etc. It's one of the strengths of their team. Not exactly an easy test for the opening game.
 
Good blocking relievers too. We don't have Lazard or Butler knocking corners and safeties on their butts. You're right. Too many things can go wrong with that play. Not worth the gamble as little as we've ever gotten out of it. We did seem to go deep with a few passes against UNI and hope that trend continues. Couple passes were just off that would have been big.
I wish we would run the bubble screen every once in a while, where the WR is in a very shallow crossing route back towards the middle. As others have said, faking that and going to the blocking receiver is a great way to get the DBs to play back a bit.
 
How the OL plays against UNI is not a clear indication of how good they are. ISU has always struggled running against UNI. As I recall Iowa and Wisconsin had a lot of trouble running against UNI. Not saying they will be good, but I think we need to see a couple more games before we give up on them. Have their best guy back would help a lot.
Not taking anything away and whatever but UNI has really gone downhill the last couple years. They aren’t the panthers they used to be.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: isutrevman
Not taking anything away and whatever but UNI has really gone downhill the last couple years. They aren’t the panthers they used to be.

They're a team that seems to give ISU, Iowa etc. fits no matter what though. The teams that almost beat Iowa and WI ('09 and '12) went on to not even make their playoffs.

If I'm ISU's coaches I'm OK with ISU having lots of evidence from the first game that they have a lot of room to work.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: NWICY and BigCyFan
If I remember, he was zipping balls in tight windows getting away with it. It cost him later during Big 12 play.
He threw a bad pick that was almost a pick six at the end of the first half. SEMO kicked a field goal to make it 21-10 at halftime. It was a critical mistake that let them back into the game, foreshadowing how the rest of the season would go.

He also threw 3 of his 4 TDs to X that game. A luxury Becht doesn’t have this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HouClone
rewatched the first half this morning paying much closer attention to individuals and position groups, and gathered some further thoughts:

+ The secondary is so fast. I couldn't spot a single weakness. The safeties play solid coverage. The corners tackle very well. You can't outrun them laterally.
+ The defense as a whole looked really good tackling. There's some hard hitters on this team.
+ The 3 starters on the DL look like a top unit
- The linebackers still seem a step slow
+ Darian Porter is an animal on special teams at the gunner position
+ The OLine actually opened up some good holes and got to the second level quite a bit on run plays
- Sanders in particular really struggles to see those holes. The RB's left a lot of yards on the field
- Just zone in on Klotz for a few plays. The goal line sneak for a TD in the first quarter in particular, Klotz just destroys a guy. Reminded me of that block Soehner had, I think against Oregon in the Fiesta Bowl.
- The WR group is concerning. Their inability to create any separation will kill alot of drives
+ That said, Noel looks like a legitimate deep threat. He broke open over the top and should have had a couple easy touch downs
 
How the OL plays against UNI is not a clear indication of how good they are. ISU has always struggled running against UNI. As I recall Iowa and Wisconsin had a lot of trouble running against UNI. Not saying they will be good, but I think we need to see a couple more games before we give up on them. Have their best guy back would help a lot.

Kind of. Other than 2020 we've definitely had a subpar line almost every year. So year, it has kind of been indicative of what they were the entire year.

I have little to no hope for the unit this year (but think Clanton's impact shows next year) but hope I'm very wrong on this.
 
Kind of. Other than 2020 we've definitely had a subpar line almost every year. So year, it has kind of been indicative of what they were the entire year.

I have little to no hope for the unit this year (but think Clanton's impact shows next year) but hope I'm very wrong on this.

Listening to Bruns' podcast this morning, he's clear that the OL isn't where it needs to be yet, but he's optimistic due to changes in technique among other factors.

Work in progress, but I think they'll improve with more game reps. I don't think we should discount the impact of losing Remsburg either.
 
These WR screens are ONLY for an elite QB. It is too easy for the young QB to have in his mind to hurry the throw, without looking and assessing the D. An easy INT or the unintended backward pass (as we saw yesterday) has bobble/pick 6 written all over it.

You need several things. You need a QB that understands the intelricacies, timing, and deceiving arm strength to get the ball out there. You need the receiver to sell fake blocks or have the opposition playing far enough off the ball. You need your other receiver to engage properly and finish blocks. Then you need the speed and athleticism from the receiver to make a play and get some yards.

If you run any play enough times it's bound to work a few. But we don't have the personnel, really across the board, for these plays to consistently work. I think that's been proven time and time again. Just get rid of it already.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SCarolinaCy
I noticed we had quite a few players leaving the game with cramps... but can't recall seeing any UNI players doing so? Should we be doing something differently nutrition and hydration wise?

Also, in relation to that... when players get these muscle cramps during a game... is there any lingering affects from that going into the next game a week later? Or do those heal up completely?
 
I noticed we had quite a few players leaving the game with cramps... but can't recall seeing any UNI players doing so? Should we be doing something differently nutrition and hydration wise?

Also, in relation to that... when players get these muscle cramps during a game... is there any lingering affects from that going into the next game a week later? Or do those heal up completely?
IV of pickle juice. Just kidding. But seriously.

I remember when I use to cramp up in my thighs it use to always stay fairly sore for quite some time. But I was never in as good as shape as these fellas.
 
IV of pickle juice. Just kidding. But seriously.

I remember when I use to cramp up in my thighs it use to always stay fairly sore for quite some time. But I was never in as good as shape as these fellas.

Yeah... I was thinking that these things can linger a bit. More likely to happen to you this week if it happened to you last week, right?
 
Very good
D looked like it hasn’t lost a step. In fact, the secondary looked elite. I can’t recall any receptions where the receiver was wide open, and only a couple where there was even a window. Pretty much every pass was contested, and most receptions were just great catches or lucky catches (i.e the deflection to a non-targeted UNI receiver who had already given up on the play and had it fall into his hand on the sideline).

Special Teams: you could tell there’s been dedicated coaching there all camp.
- Actual strategy on punts and punt coverage (Perkins and Porter were quite the duo out there).
- Noel looked way more comfortable receiving punts. He consistently made the right call on returning/fair catching/letting it drop inside our own 10
- Actual blocking scheme on punts. On Noel’s big return they set up with a wall and allowed him to use his speed to get to the outside

Tight Ends looked like they’ll be productive safety valves all season. Brahmer is big and has good hands (albeit that’s based on a sample size of one catch)

Bad:

The offensive line. I think some are sugarcoating them because we won handily, but they were pretty poor in all aspects.
- Pass protection: we didn’t give up any sacks only because we only passed 18 times and our QBs had some nice scrambles. UNI consistently got push, and even on Brahmer’s TD pass, #66 completely whiffed on his block and Becht was dead to rights. Luckily Brahmer ran a great route and Becht got the ball to him before he got hit.
- There were very few holes for the RBs to run through. If you take away our QB scrambles, RBs had 22 carries for 103 yards (4.68 YPC). Not awful, but I felt like the RBs had to make a lot of guys miss to get those 4 yards.
- Penalties: Both Hufford and Simmons had holding calls. Simmons’ happened on a would-be first down.

The Big 12: It’s just the first week, but the league struggled. TCU’s loss wasn’t awful. But Texas Tech and Baylor’s losses were really bad. And Oklahoma State looked less than impressive against Central Oklahoma. On the flip side, maybe that means there are more winnable games for us this year.
Excepting the botched Xtra point try, obviously, ST were very good. I am somewhat concerned, however, about the time it takes to get the punts off. The ISU punter is a good 15 yds back, but takes a full five/six yards long stride forward in striking the ball, to get the yardage. UNI chose not to put ANY pressure on the punter so it is difficult to assess any overall protection weakness here. Still, Iowa is going to change up things however is necessary, so as not to allow this advantage gain that we saw against UNI.
 
rewatched the first half this morning paying much closer attention to individuals and position groups, and gathered some further thoughts:

+ The secondary is so fast. I couldn't spot a single weakness. The safeties play solid coverage. The corners tackle very well. You can't outrun them laterally.
+ The defense as a whole looked really good tackling. There's some hard hitters on this team.
+ The 3 starters on the DL look like a top unit
- The linebackers still seem a step slow
+ Darian Porter is an animal on special teams at the gunner position
+ The OLine actually opened up some good holes and got to the second level quite a bit on run plays
- Sanders in particular really struggles to see those holes. The RB's left a lot of yards on the field
- Just zone in on Klotz for a few plays. The goal line sneak for a TD in the first quarter in particular, Klotz just destroys a guy. Reminded me of that block Soehner had, I think against Oregon in the Fiesta Bowl.
- The WR group is concerning. Their inability to create any separation will kill alot of drives
+ That said, Noel looks like a legitimate deep threat. He broke open over the top and should have had a couple easy touch downs
Your point about the WR’s is interesting. I’ve watched the game a few times already,(probably obsessively) and I noticed this as well. However, upon further review, to me it didn’t look like they were given many opportunities to even attempt to create separation. Lots of dink and dunk routes. I wonder how much having a 7 point lead changed the way CMC and NS were going to call the game. Noel looked great on his deep routes, just has to work on his timing with Rocco
 
  • Like
Reactions: Malty Flannel
Nah, why risk injuries and show anybody anything? CMC played it right. Game was never in doubt after half. Sucked to watch, but I like the W and keep Iowa guessing as much as possible.
And it's not too late to paint the visiting locker room pink! :D
 
  • Funny
Reactions: NWICY

Help Support Us

Become a patron