Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)

I would have loved to add WSU and OSU (despite Canzano pushing anit-Big 12 propaganda at one of those schools direction) if we hadn't already taken 2 of Cincy, CFU, and Houston (no offense to them). WSU and OSU are probably the best cultural fits to us and the Big 12 than any of the new additions but don't add value when being added to a new conference (which sadly matters more). Cincy, CFU, and Houston were still desperation adds to fend off ESPN and the AAC trying to poach some teams from the Big 12.
I like the Cincy and BYU adds. I'd trade Houston or UCF for those 2 in a heartbeat though.
 
Can't the B12 go to 20 for basketball only? Conferences adding affiliates in some sports and not others is not an unprecedented thing.

For schools like UCONN or Gonzaga, sure. But the TV money is still in football. So anyone with a decent program will want full membership. Even UCONN would probably want full membership unless they want to drop the football program entirely.

I actually think it makes more sense to add these West coast schools as football only and have them go to the WCC in other sports. Football has the easiest travel situation for spread out conferences.
 
As Mediocre football Vanderbilt with a below average crowd shows out again I ask again that we quit referring to the SEC and Big 10 as super conference’s based on the top half of the conferences when the have extremely weak bottoms.
This. At this rate, how money hungry both of these conferences are, if the SEC and Big Ten could take both of their top halves and form a true super league, they would boot the Indianas, Vanderbilts of each league so they could have $150 mil+ revenue per team.
 
Well this sounds definitive…

This aligns with what BY said after adding the 4 corner schools. Not that something else couldn't happen, but BY has been pretty consistent. Either vague to allow for whatever he has going in dark, smokey rooms or pretty definitive in what he means.
 
I suspect this "PAC remnants to the Big12" is a stalking horse rumor put out by the remnants themselves, to motivate the ACC to take them. Probably the Oregon St AD that has a track record of misinformation to drive a narrative in their favor.

Makes zero sense. BY isnt taking value detractors now, when there are future ACC remnants in a more populated, better geo-located area that are also good adds to suppurt his bball growth strategy.

Frankly, UConn makes more sense for the Big12 than ANY of the PAC 4 leftovers.
 
I wouldn't take the Pac 4 even at a discount because there would be an expectation that revenue would be split equally after the next contract. Plus, I don't think a conference should have more than 20 teams (and we need to save room for Eastward expansion). I don't think scheduling works well when you get above 20 teams.
I’d say a conference with 24 teams can work if you split into two divisions of 12 and only have games within your division, with the division champions meeting in a conference title game … but then you really just have two conferences with a playoff agreement, and what the hell is the purpose of that?

Conferences spread all the hell over the country with teams who rarely or never play each other aren’t actually conferences, and I don’t get why CFB is moving in that direction (yes I do, it’s $$$$$$).
 
  • Like
Reactions: LonelyCyKC
Some just don’t understand that there will be losers in the fight for media dollars as B1G and SEC plunder the lesser conferences. It is not the Big 12’s mission to save the unfortunate schools that the B1G and SEC put into these desperate situations. B1G and SEC did this.
 
I would have loved to add WSU and OSU (despite Canzano pushing anit-Big 12 propaganda at one of those schools direction) if we hadn't already taken 2 of Cincy, CFU, and Houston (no offense to them). WSU and OSU are probably the best cultural fits to us and the Big 12 than any of the new additions but don't add value when being added to a new conference (which sadly matters more). Cincy, CFU, and Houston were still desperation adds to fend off ESPN and the AAC trying to poach some teams from the Big 12.
Everyone hates to see WSU and OSU get left behind, they are generally quality teams, but location is everything and its twice as far distance wise than the Florida school. Florida has a larger population which adds to recruiting and TV numbers.

Is sucks for both WSU and OSU but we need to worry about ISU and less about doing the right thing for other schools, that may cost ISU down the line.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mr.G.Spot
Two of those teams are now P4, one is totally irrelevant, and Tulane beat USC with some of its top players sitting out. My point is in a playoff with no one sitting out and everyone trying those G5 schools aren’t going to do anything but lose. I’m fine with G5 getting in if they put together a perfect season and beat multiple P4 teams but there need to be some major qualifiers

It'll be interesting to see if players sit out of the expanded playoffs. Short term fame or stay injury free for the draft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldCy
Well this sounds definitive…

Yeah plain as day that was definitely leaked by Stanford/Cal to gain leverage over the ACC.

Especially considering it was reported by a SF Chronicle columnist who primarily covers the Niners. I wouldn’t say he’s plugged into college football realignment
 
people saying they'd take one of 4 pac schools over UCF will think very differently in 2031.

UCF is a sleeping giant and will battle for conference championships in the near future.

they are just too well set up in a hotbed of football recruiting to fail. and i they have huge numbers of students.

no one cares about wazzou or beaver football. if they did they wouldnt be staring a mw invite in the face.

UCF also opens florida recruiting, which is equal to Texas.
 
It'll be interesting to see if players sit out of the expanded playoffs. Short term fame or stay injury free for the draft.
Guys won't sit playoff games, because each game will be meaningful. Win and advance in the playoffs.

Bowls are exhibitions with possible bragging rights. If I were an NFL GM and a kid sat out a playoff game, I would question their commitment to team.
 
Can't the B12 go to 20 for basketball only? Conferences adding affiliates in some sports and not others is not an unprecedented thing.
I believe I read once that "basketball only" isn't actually a thing. NCAA rules allow for "football only" schools, and then they also allow conferences to add affiliates when the affiliate member's non-football conference doesn't offer a specific sport.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: aauummm
Guys won't sit playoff games, because each game will be meaningful. Win and advance in the playoffs.

Bowls are exhibitions with possible bragging rights. If I were an NFL GM and a kid sat out a playoff game, I would question their commitment to team.
It will be interesting. You could say the same thing about an NCAA Championship as bowls regarding bragging rights. You don’t receive anything tangible from an NCAA title (maybe championship rings?)

A first round selection will net you millions. Life-changing money for most of these guys. Potentially generational-changing money.

I don’t necessarily expect it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if guys sat out the playoffs (that injured OSU receiver Smith-Njigba opted to just sit out the playoffs rather than rush his rehab to play last season. Different scenario but a bit of a precedent).
 
It will be interesting. You could say the same thing about an NCAA Championship as bowls regarding bragging rights. You don’t receive anything tangible from an NCAA title (maybe championship rings?)

A first round selection will net you millions. Life-changing money for most of these guys. Potentially generational-changing money.

I don’t necessarily expect it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if guys sat out the playoffs (that injured OSU receiver Smith-Njigba opted to just sit out the playoffs rather than rush his rehab to play last season. Different scenario but a bit of a precedent).

Coming back from an injury is different. You are not 100%. And susceptible to additional injuries. 100% healthy and sit out. I question your intangibles.
 
It will be interesting. You could say the same thing about an NCAA Championship as bowls regarding bragging rights. You don’t receive anything tangible from an NCAA title (maybe championship rings?)

A first round selection will net you millions. Life-changing money for most of these guys. Potentially generational-changing money.

I don’t necessarily expect it, but I wouldn’t be surprised if guys sat out the playoffs (that injured OSU receiver Smith-Njigba opted to just sit out the playoffs rather than rush his rehab to play last season. Different scenario but a bit of a precedent).
Take that logic one step further and why should a high first draft pick like Caleb Williams even play a regular season game at USC this season? Let alone playoff games.

IMO at some point an elite college player is going to test the 3 year draft eligibility rule and win. If there is pay for play for college-athletes(NIL), seems like some are ready to be NFL professionals.
 
Last edited:
Take that logic one step further and why should a high first draft pick like Caleb Williams even play a regular season game at USC this season? Let alone playoff games.

IMO at some point an elite college player is going to test the 3 year draft eligibility rule and win. If there is pay for play for college-athletes, seems like some are ready to be NFL professionals.
Ed Oliver did this at Houston under the guise of injury. Coach Major Applewhite was pissed. Jadaveon Clowney kind of did this too his senior season at South Carolina
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron