Realignment Megathread (All The Moves)
- Thread starter ISUcyclones11
- Start date
20mil a year streaming?
no way oregon washington or az stay.
no way oregon washington or az stay.
Yeah that would not have great sub numbers I'm guessing. I like college football but I'm not paying for a Pac12 only network.
This Apple TV Deal is starting to sound like a MLM scheme advertising UNCAPPED earning potential with enough sign-ups 
My gawd is the college football or Avon...
My gawd is the college football or Avon...
Like I said, I will watch football any chance I get, even if it's between Iowa and Rutgers (shiver) or Fresno State vs UNLV. I love having games nearly every night of the week.
BUT, even with that and a subscription to every streaming service, I wouldn't likely subscribe to a PAC only add-on... unless they had games on when there was literally no other game on.
To build a revenue forecast on subscriber numbers that would have to be incredibly small would be a difficult task.
BUT, even with that and a subscription to every streaming service, I wouldn't likely subscribe to a PAC only add-on... unless they had games on when there was literally no other game on.
To build a revenue forecast on subscriber numbers that would have to be incredibly small would be a difficult task.
Arizona and Arizona state both held emergency meetings with their BOR today. I wonder if we will hear something even as early as tonight. For sure Zona would be invited if they are open to it. I wonder if the Big12 would be fine with ASU as well. I know in the past ASU seemed to shrug off the Big12. Gotta think if your options are the big 12 or the new "western/academic focused mountain west" Pac 12. You better do some groveling.
I'm sure the PAC-9 members are crunching the numbers. Highest payout, baring Nike including a sub with every shoe, would have to be the alumni base of the members. Lowest might only be current season ticket holders.
Is anyone outside the PAC going to pay $79 (MLS season pass cost) to watch Cal v WSU?
Is anyone outside the PAC going to pay $79 (MLS season pass cost) to watch Cal v WSU?
But adding Rutgers makes NY/NJ in market. It increases the BTN carriage fee exponentially.
So big markets like Chicago, New York, LA, etc. are a steady & big revenue stream. So Rutgers might not have great teams, but they are a Sugar Daddy for the Big10.
The most feasible way to make this happen is if they were to bundle the subscription with other services.
I don’t know but I’d like to try and sell Arizona a timeshare in Cancun.This Apple TV Deal is starting to sound like a MLM scheme advertising UNCAPPED earning potential with enough sign-ups
My gawd is the college football or Avon...
Woof. Any PAC-12 school that signs up for this disaster deserves what they get. I bet GK plays a mean game of 3 card Monty
I don't know about most people but my household is kind of getting "streamers fatigue" with the amount that we currently subscribe to and how many are out there.
I don't see us ever ditching Prime, we like YTTV, Disney for kids, but all the others are close to the chopping block for us.
I don't see us ever ditching Prime, we like YTTV, Disney for kids, but all the others are close to the chopping block for us.
RedditCFB just casually pointing out that someone noone trusts (Mhver) had it yesterday that someone everyone trusts (Thamel) is giving us today. I'm here for the chaos.
Exactly what I said yesterday based on Thamel's X.....ASU And Utah want to move. It comes down to Fox and the B12 agreeing to take a 15th and 16th. For OR and WA, they may actually hang in the PAC with some lesser schools, take a bigger cut of the base payout and rule that conference for the next few years before a B10 invite probably comes.
Yep, no way you're getting most casual fans to sign up for a PAC12 only subscription. We rotate our subscriptions right now depending on what we're watching
It would be funny if OR jumps in and takes the last spot.