Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because the big ten doesn’t own the majority of BTN anymore and those carriage fees aren’t what they were. Also the presidents don’t want a P2. That is a media and message board narrative. They added the LA schools because it is a perfect fit of academics, athletics, politics, and market. Could it happen one day, sure, but there is zero rush for the big ten or sec to make a move. Especially since they are still trying to figure out how to integrate the LA schools.But if we are moving to a P2, winning the brand battle will mean more TV rights money. Right now the Big10/SEC are basically even in the $60-65M range. Plus, if the Big10 was willing to add just USC/UCLA, that tells me being a national conference is their primary goal.
Meanwhile, the SEC is content being a regional conference.
Lastly, BTN carriage fees have been a big push for recent Big10 expansion with Rutgers (NY), Maryland (DC) and USC/UCLA (LA). Why wouldn't the Big10 continue that strategic push and develop a presence in Florida? Florida = Print More Big10 Money!
Different Strokes/Different Folks!So there's a good chance Arizona State and Utah will end up joining the Big 12 after all, but only because they have no other acceptable option. They love to look down their noses at the Big 12 and they've been very vocal about it.
I say screw them. I'd rather we rent OR and WA for the next several years or we stand pat at 14 than take those two arrogant schools. Let them make $8/million per year on the MWC.
Explain that a bit.Because the big ten doesn’t own the majority of BTN anymore and those carriage fees aren’t what they were. Also the presidents don’t want a P2. That is a media and message board narrative. They added the LA schools because it is a perfect fit of academics, athletics, politics, and market. Could it happen one day, sure, but there is zero rush for the big ten or sec to make a move. Especially since they are still trying to figure out how to integrate the LA schools.
You want to share a link for that?Explain that a bit.
In industry articles carriage fees were a big reason for Big10 adding both USC & UCLA. There was a carriage multiplier for 2 schools in a geographic area with 17M+ people.
I guess I’m surprised so many agree with your take…no offense. Colorado certainly isn’t one of the most valuable Pac12 schools. They were the piece we were most likely to get. If they don’t make the house fall and net us another better piece, I think it’s reasonable to have wondered if the Big 12 should have waited. (Note that I don’t think this will be an issue.). If we were to end up with a G5 school, you’ve possibly watered down the league with two bottom half teams (a la the Big 10 adding Maryland and Rutgers). You can’t tell me they wouldn’t like those spots back. Washington and Oregon would clearly be better adds.
I guess I’m surprised so many agree with your take…no offense. Colorado certainly isn’t one of the most valuable Pac12 schools. They were the piece we were most likely to get. If they don’t make the house fall and net us another better piece, I think it’s reasonable to have wondered if the Big 12 should have waited. (Note that I don’t think this will be an issue.). If we were to end up with a G5 school, you’ve possibly watered down the league with two bottom half teams (a la the Big 10 adding Maryland and Rutgers). You can’t tell me they wouldn’t like those spots back. Washington and Oregon would clearly be better adds.
I guess I’m surprised so many agree with your take…no offense. Colorado certainly isn’t one of the most valuable Pac12 schools. They were the piece we were most likely to get. If they don’t make the house fall and net us another better piece, I think it’s reasonable to have wondered if the Big 12 should have waited. (Note that I don’t think this will be an issue.). If we were to end up with a G5 school, you’ve possibly watered down the league with two bottom half teams (a la the Big 10 adding Maryland and Rutgers). You can’t tell me they wouldn’t like those spots back. Washington and Oregon would clearly be better adds.
Also, Jim Williams with a little lead here (not sure if he’s sourced though or just reading various Twitter accounts):
Pretty sure this is what they are talking about https://california.asu.edu/Why would UT 'monitor' ASU when there's absolutely no correlation on the L.A. connection between the two schools. Or am I unaware of a UT satellite campus in L.A. too?
Different Strokes/Different Folks!
Obviously, what motivates CU vs ASU is different. Just because ASU and Utah have been very outspoken about staying in the Pac12, doesn't mean they would be a bad fit for the Big12.
ASU, Utah and other Pac12 schools are motivated to stay in the Pac12. Is that loyalty to a fault? Is it financially motivated? It's probably both. The Pac12 is in the middle of a media rights negotiation, I would think ASU and Utah want to be committed to that process, to maximize the potential value of a Pac12 media deal.
Nothing wrong with being 100% committed. ASU & Utah have too much media value for the Big12 not to add.
Why would UT 'monitor' ASU when there's absolutely no correlation on the L.A. connection between the two schools. Or am I unaware of a UT satellite campus in L.A. too?
Why would UT 'monitor' ASU when there's absolutely no correlation on the L.A. connection between the two schools. Or am I unaware of a UT satellite campus in L.A. too?
I get that, but why is that a reason for UT to hold pat? Unless there are numbers to make the Pac12 viable even 'after' AZ leaves. Which, to me, seems ludicrous.Pretty sure this is what they are talking about https://california.asu.edu/
Also, Jim Williams with a little lead here (not sure if he’s sourced though or just reading various Twitter accounts):
Also, Jim Williams with a little lead here (not sure if he’s sourced though or just reading various Twitter accounts):
Why would UT 'monitor' ASU when there's absolutely no correlation on the L.A. connection between the two schools. Or am I unaware of a UT satellite campus in L.A. too?