Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
honestly, i think the Big 10 reached on USC/UCLA and only did it to prevent the SEC from getting them. i think they would fully prefer 4 ACC schools.I'm positive B10's top 4 ACC picks would be before Washington...the question is who they'd be competing with SEC for.
Do FSU/Clemson prefer Big Ten vs joining their in state rivals? Which does UNC prefer?
UNC to Big Ten seems like the only really obvious one to me. The others I could see breaking either way.
If Big Ten wanted USC you can be sure they want FSU and/or Miami. Does SEC want more of Florida? How much more?
I hope so…truth is nobody knows nothing. There’s probably a handful of people out there who know- and they aren’t saying anything. It’ll happen when it happens- but oh boy, it is sure fun to watch. I’ve haven’t been this excited about the B12 in a long time.The fact that we're hearing absolutely nothing from or about Washington tells me that the next team to jump will be Washington.
The more I check out Utah boards the more I hope they get left behind into the land of hasbeens. What a cocky bunch of *ssholes they don't even realize their conference is disappearing around them.
Take this for what it is worth
I feel the exact same way. I've said it before, but when this all shakes out, I wouldn't be surprised to find out they were never an option for the Big 12 and that's why they have been the poster child of unity for the PAC.The more I check out Utah boards the more I hope they get left behind into the land of hasbeens. What a cocky bunch of *ssholes they don't even realize their conference is disappearing around them.
honestly, i think the Big 10 reached on USC/UCLA and only did it to prevent the SEC from getting them. i think they would fully prefer 4 ACC schools.
Throw in a round of pinkie-swears and it's ironclad, baby!New “Alliance” incoming. Many handshakes on it.
Take this for what it is worth
Agree. Do you think the B1G cares about the perception of wrecking the PAC12? And that is why they are waiting? Or is that not really a thing, and they really aren't that interested in them?Nah they just want the invite, if the big ten wanted them they would already be members
Take this for what it is worth
Read this tweet. Live this tweet. Succeed in the foreseeable future with your realignment takes.
it seems timing is a big part of realignment. Contemplating if the PAC had accepted the idea of a merger, our noobs (sans Colorado) would probably not be P3 status. Our we better off that the PAC turned the merger down for the future, or would we be better off with some schools that are prima donnas had they worked to make the merger happen. I am sure Cincy, Houston, Central Florida, and BYU are glad they didn't accept, are the old members better or worse? Seems debatable; IMO I honestly think we are better, especially if Yormack is able to land Washington and Oregon
Take this for what it is worth
Big 10 has reached the entire realignment process. Last 13 years they’ve grabbed whatever they could quickly. Maryland, Rutgers, Nebraska. Bunch of moronshonestly, i think the Big 10 reached on USC/UCLA and only did it to prevent the SEC from getting them. i think they would fully prefer 4 ACC schools.