Bowlsby Stepping Down Later This Year

The issue with Bowlsby is that he was an outsider trying to convince club members that this was the club for them. We needed to hire someone that “was” OU/UT that felt OuT were the Club. With the rise of the SEC and A&M, that was likely not possible as of around 2016. Right after the last realignment round, there was a brief time in which the Big 12
The Big 12 has been the clear #3 in terms of pay out and power. That wasn't good enough for UT and OU. THEY HAD TO HAVE MOAARRRRR.

Iowa's just insanely lucky that Ohio State and Michigan don't feel the same way.
 
Bowlsby was a caretaker, not a visionary leader. In a league of schools that didn't really want to do anything radical, he was the right guy. Unfortunately, with the TV money, NIL, CFP expansion, etc... a more radical and proactive/preemptive approach was what they needed. They needed to try to stay ahead of the SEC and B1G, just to keep up with them. And no one had the vision for that.

OuT isn't his fault, although I understand why he kind of has to fall on his sword for it.

I will say that after OuT backstabbed the conference, he has done a good job of laying the groundwork to hold their (and ESPN's) feet to the fire, trying to extract the maximum amount of compensation from them. That's been probably the one clever thing he has done - he lost, but is trying to make it a pyhrric victory for ESPN and OuT.

Was he great? No. Is it all his fault? No.
That became truly impossible when ESPN went in bed with the SEC. They were determined to essentially neg the Big 12 out of existence, or at least do enough damage to convince UT and OU to join the SEC.

That was essentially the point of the Big 12's action against ESPN. They intentionally undervalued the conference to entice the biggest brands out of it into their flagship brand. And they had the bully pulpit to do it.
 
Bruce Vande Velde is a darkhorse
giphy.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cygrads
Exactly. The fact that the big 12 doesn't have its own media network to tell it's story is problematic in 2022.
Having your own media network can have its' downside. Just ask the Pac-12. I think Tier 3 was initiated by the B12 and was a brilliant concept for those schools with an urban market. It's all about 'branding' going forward and infiltration of those urban markets.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: jbhtexas
Having your own media network can have its' downside. Just ask the Pac-12. I think Tier 3 was initiated by the B12 and was a brilliant concept for those schools with an urban market. It's all about 'branding' going forward and infiltration of those urban markets.
Also ask the ACC...whose network has been a fiasco as well.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cloneon
The big mistake was how the Big 8 handled the first expansion. If it indeed wanted to expand, it should have gone after Arkansas first from the SWC. Even though it could help the new conference command more money, Texas was the spoiled child and should have been ignored at that point. The fact that the conference had to accept all the rest in order to get Texas was the downfall. We allowed the Big 8 to be dictated by the Governor of Texas.
 
Boren was the clear ringleader of the prior expansion exploration fiasco. Neither Bowlsby or other B12 Presidents (includng Leath who was pissed at the whole sham) were in Boren's corner on that.

ESPN orchestrated the departures of OU and UT before the close of ESPN's exclusive negotiating window for the B12's new TV deal. ESPN didn't want the B12 taking the deal to the open market with OU and UT. There is nothing that Bowlsby could have done to prevent that but now ESPN/OU/UT have to pay the price for that orchestration.
And "The Mouth of the SEC" Paul Finebaum gave us some insight into Boren's actions, when last summer he said he personally knew that OU had been pursuing the SEC several years before last year's defection. Boren had been trying to blow up the conference for years.
 
Last edited:
Former Big 12 Commissioner Kevin Weiberg, on his way out the door in 2007:

"In this job, you really don't have a vote. It ultimately comes down to what your members are willing to do. In some of these areas [revenue and television], there just has not been a lot of change since the conference was formed."

Remember that Weiberg tried to put together a Big 12 TV network, but got shot down. Then he ended up going to the B1G to oversee the start of BTN.
 
The big mistake was how the Big 8 handled the first expansion. If it indeed wanted to expand, it should have gone after Arkansas first from the SWC. Even though it could help the new conference command more money, Texas was the spoiled child and should have been ignored at that point. The fact that the conference had to accept all the rest in order to get Texas was the downfall. We allowed the Big 8 to be dictated by the Governor of Texas.
This has got to be the most profound post in the history of CycloneFanatic.
 
And "The Mouth of the SEC" Paul Finebaum gave us some insight into Boren's actions, when last summer he said that he personally knew that OU had been pursuing the SEC several years before last year's defection. Boren had been trying to blow up the conference for years.
Boren is a **** head of epic proportions
 
And "The Mouth of the SEC" Paul Finebaum gave us some insight into Boren's actions, when last summer he said he personally knew that OU had been pursuing the SEC several years before last year's defection. Boren had been trying to blow up the conference for years.
As if that's some MASSIVE revelation.
 
Some repetition:
 
Some repetition:

It's gotta be Luck right?
 
The SEC and Big 10 won the arms race long before Bowlsby took the job; it was just a matter of waiting for the advantages to play out. For now, there is a top tier of college football and we're not on it. No commissioner was going to change that fact, but Bowlsby at least was able to keep us in the second tier. For that, I think he did a good job.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JRE1975

Help Support Us

Become a patron