They probably should make Fickell a great offer.Yeah he's getting canned after this year
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They probably should make Fickell a great offer.Yeah he's getting canned after this year
I think he'll aim higher but the schedule would be easier in the Big Ten WestThey probably should make Fickell a great offer.
Can always jump up even within division/conference when the time comes.I think he'll aim higher but the schedule would be easier in the Big Ten West
So the same amount of top 10 Big12 teams that ISU will have to face.
Cyclone fans are pissed about our 3-2 record and how that record came about, but the fact of the matter is all the analytics models still have ISU in the top 15 because we are really efficient on both sides of the ball. So even though we're unranked by AP/USAToday, the analytics like Sagarin are counting us as a good win for Iowa.
Sagarin has ISU at #12 (Iowa #5). FEI has ISU at #9 (Iowa #6). SP+ has ISU at #11 (Iowa #16). Massey has ISU at #16 (Iowa #3). ESPN FPI has ISU at #8 (Iowa #13).
And look, I get it - "you play to win the game." But when you look at what it takes to win games, ISU largely does that stuff. Human polls don't care how you win, just that you win. The analytics care more about how well and how consistently you play, even if you lose. And ISU has played well enough in general to be 4-1 or 5-0 so far. But a few bad plays here and there have tripped us up.
ISU will play its entire conference. Iowa will get a pass on 3 of the top 4 potential opponents.
This looks like 2015-16 all over again. Enjoy getting stomped in the Rose Bowl after rolling over in the Big10 title game
I don't think an ASU could beat IA, Oregon sure, but other than that, the PAC is a train wreck.ISU will play its entire conference. Iowa will get a pass on 3 of the top 4 potential opponents.
This looks like 2015-16 all over again. Enjoy getting stomped in the Rose Bowl after rolling over in the Big10 title game
Exactly. I said this last night, I kinda want Iowa to go the CFP semifinals so they would get destroyed by 40+.I don't think an ASU could beat IA, Oregon sure, but other than that, the PAC is a train wreck.
I'm not talking about last year, I'm saying that SOS is generally determined by computers and many computers are still very high on ISU even though our fans aren't. Hence Iowa's "difficult schedule" despite only playing one team with an impressive record. The SOS calculators still say ISU is a quality win for Iowa even though our fans are really down on our current record. Still a lot of ball to be played, and just like most everyone else ISU is still in the hunt for a conference title.Sagarin rankings last year had Iowa ahead of ISU.
ESPN FPI had a 4-3 Wisconsin ranked above ISU last year
These seem like totally legit rankings
CFP is a heckuva achievement. With their defense I don't see them getting killed tho.Exactly. I said this last night, I kinda want Iowa to go the CFP semifinals so they would get destroyed by 40+.
Iowa has played a meat grinder of a schedule so far. Going 6-0 vs the #10 Sagarin SOS is crazy good. ISU is 3-2 while playing the #66 SOS, that’s a YIKES!
No, people on here think that bad teams are ranked #2 in the country.
Cyclone fans are pissed about our 3-2 record and how that record came about, but the fact of the matter is all the analytics models still have ISU in the top 15 because we are really efficient on both sides of the ball. So even though we're unranked by AP/USAToday, the analytics like Sagarin are counting us as a good win for Iowa.
Sagarin has ISU at #12 (Iowa #5). FEI has ISU at #9 (Iowa #6). SP+ has ISU at #11 (Iowa #16). Massey has ISU at #16 (Iowa #3). ESPN FPI has ISU at #8 (Iowa #13).
And look, I get it - "you play to win the game." But when you look at what it takes to win games, ISU largely does that stuff. Human polls don't care how you win, just that you win. The analytics care more about how well and how consistently you play, even if you lose. And ISU has played well enough in general to be 4-1 or 5-0 so far. But a few bad plays here and there have tripped us up.
ISU will play its entire conference. Iowa will get a pass on 3 of the top 4 potential opponents.
This looks like 2015-16 all over again. Enjoy getting stomped in the Rose Bowl after rolling over in the Big10 title game
Idk I think I have a lesser standard than most of you. I consider 8-5, even 7-6 to be good or at least ok teams. I mean some on here debate if Cincinatti or ND is good. Of course they're good. I think Virginia Tech in Blacksburg is impressive. If Iowa or Iowa state won there next weekend I'd say that's a good win
What? Penn St is good.Ha. You have to recalibrate your standards on this board. Any team Iowa plays is terrible, basically a bye. It‘a a coping mechanism for some of the best posters here. They are having a tough time.