Ahhh, I thought bad fit for Iowa meant accurate passer.This guy's style is more of an up-tempo, gunslinger type. Do you think he wants to be in Iowa's pro-style, 3-step drop style of offense?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahhh, I thought bad fit for Iowa meant accurate passer.This guy's style is more of an up-tempo, gunslinger type. Do you think he wants to be in Iowa's pro-style, 3-step drop style of offense?
Iowa isn’t exactly a pro style offense anymore, but I know what you mean. They way he plays looks like a perfect fit for Penn State imo.This guy's style is more of an up-tempo, gunslinger type. Do you think he wants to be in Iowa's pro-style, 3-step drop style of offense?
ISU has one good QB for the first time since Wallace and you don’t know how to act. Relax.
Penn State would be a better fit. Iowa State would be a good fit too. I know that he's high on us.Iowa isn’t exactly a pro style offense anymore, but I know what you mean. They way he plays looks like a perfect fit for Penn State imo.
Ahhh, I thought bad fit for Iowa meant accurate passer.
ISU has one good QB since Wallace and you guys don’t know how to act. Relax lol.I think he meant because he is good
Since when?Iowa isn’t exactly a pro style offense anymore
ISU has one good QB since Wallace and you guys don’t know how to act. Relax lol.
Since they aren’t under center 75% of the time anymore. Play multiple sets, 5 wide at times. Do they still play under center with one or two backs? Yeah, but it’s not the same offense as 5 years ago.Since when?
I guess we’ll know once we see Dekkers. Saw him in high school and wasn’t wowed by his ability, although he moves well for his size.Pre-CMC QB talk is irrelevant IMO
Kyle Kempt was a pretty good QB tbh. Obviously got injured which allowed Brock Purdy to be born, but he was extremely solid in 2017.ISU has one good QB since Wallace and you guys don’t know how to act. Relax lol.
Didn't he break essentially every single record for passing in Iowa High School Football history?I guess we’ll know once we see Dekkers. Saw him in high school and wasn’t wowed by his ability, although he moves well for his size.
They are still considered pro-style though. No one is under center predominantly anymore, unless you run the triple option. Their passing game is extremely conservative too.Since they aren’t under center 75% of the time anymore. Play multiple sets, 5 wide at times. Do they still play under center with one or two backs? Yeah, but it’s not the same offense as 5 years ago.
He also played Class 1A in Iowa. That’s why it’s hard to judge how truly good of a QB DeJean actually would be.Didn't he break essentially every single record for passing in Iowa High School Football history?
You don’t actually think Kempt>Stanley though do you?Kyle Kempt was a pretty good QB tbh. Obviously got injured which allowed Brock Purdy to be born, but he was extremely solid in 2017.
That's fair. Idk Hunter came in at times last year and looked solid. Who knows what he'll be like when he actually plays. Considering last year didn't count at all, and he won't play next year and could possibly even redshirt if he doesn't play in 4 games, he could be a RS FR his 3rd year.He also played Class 1A in Iowa. That’s why it’s hard to judge how truly good of a QB DeJean actually would be.
Kempt>StanleyYou don’t actually think Kempt>Stanley though do you?
I have no idea if Kempt's phenomenal year was an anomaly or not, so it would not be fair for me to say he was better than Stanley. He was far more accurate and a better decision maker, but he also had Lazard and Hakeem Butler on his team that certainly made things easier.You don’t actually think Kempt>Stanley though do you?
Kempt > StanleyYou don’t actually think Kempt>Stanley though do you?
Kempt was good but I think Stanley was better. Like you said, two NFL WRs helped Kempt and Iowa underutilizing Fant hurt Stanley. I think it’s fair to say that the defenses Stanley played were a little tougher too, while Kempt’s sample size of games wasn’t big enough imo.I have no idea if Kempt's phenomenal year was an anomaly or not, so it would not be fair for me to say he was better than Stanley. He was far more accurate and a better decision maker, but he also had Lazard and Hakeem Butler on his team that certainly made things easier.
1787 yds, 66%, 15 TD's, 3 INTs, 145.9 rating through 8 games. That's incredibly efficient. But Nate had 2 really good years his SO and JR season. His SR year is what a lot of people remember and he just wasn't that good.
Stanley had two top 20 picks lolKempt was good but I think Stanley was better. Like you said, two NFL WRs helped Kempt and Iowa underutilizing Fant hurt Stanley. I think it’s fair to say that the defenses Stanley played were a little tougher too, while Kempt’s sample size of games wasn’t big enough imo.