Lol trying to get a timeout again I seeNo one guards him. Every game I've watched he's open all day in the corner. Bolton has no interest in passing the ball to him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol trying to get a timeout again I seeNo one guards him. Every game I've watched he's open all day in the corner. Bolton has no interest in passing the ball to him.
JFC lol alright. I don't understand why everything has to be turned into an argument. He's a career 37% 3 point shooter so you're right, all he's ever done is shoot wide open.No one guards him. Every game I've watched he's open all day in the corner. Bolton has no interest in passing the ball to him.
It's always amazing to me how much and how intently you trolls watch Iowa State Athletics.No one guards him. Every game I've watched he's open all day in the corner. Bolton has no interest in passing the ball to him.
Did you watch the game? I think it's pretty obvious you didn't.So what are you alluding to then? Again, you'd call someone a moron.
Just admit you were wrong.
I get that and agree those teams don't have great offenses but im using those exact same teams to compare what they previously scored.I think it certainly could've improved I just think there's a bit of a coincidence that Iowa's defense has looked good for 4 straight games against teams that don't have great offenses.
Outside of Wisconsin last night, the 3 other opponents shot terribly against Iowa from beyond the arc. Indiana was 26%, Rutgers was 21% and MSU was 29%. Did Iowa have an affect on that? Probably some. Maybe they caught some poor offensive teams on off nights as well? Probably. Also, Wisconsin shot 22% from two last night which is awful.
So I think it's a combination of playing bad offensive teams, which is a recipe for success when trying to improve on that end of the floor.
Exactly. For his career he is not as good as Bohannon.JFC lol alright. I don't understand why everything has to be turned into an argument. He's a career 37% 3 point shooter so you're right, all he's ever done is shoot wide open.
You said Connor didn't play as much last night as he normally does.Did you watch the game? I think it's pretty obvious you didn't.
He didn't play his normal minutes throughout the game. Yes, he made up for it by probably playing the last 8 mins of the game. He played less than normal in the 1st half and less than normal the 1st 10 mins of 2nd half. The box score won't tell you that though.You said Connor didn't play as much last night as he normally does.
He played 24 minutes last night and that's more than his season average.
How is this difficult for you?
He didn't play his normal minutes throughout the game. Yes, he made up for it by probably playing the last 8 mins of the game. He played less than normal in the 1st half and less than normal the 1st 10 mins of 2nd half. The box score won't tell you that though.
I know and I'm saying that those teams shot very very bad beyond the arc (Wisconsin from 2), which obviously has a huge effect on points scored. As someone pointed out, Wisconsin was wide open a lot and just missed shots. That's part of the game of basketball, however good teams, particularly good shooting teams will capitalize on that.I get that and agree those teams don't have great offenses but im using those exact same teams to compare what they previously scored.
When you were checking the box score, did you notice CJ Fredrick played 31 minutes?
I would agree. Bohannon is a good 3 point shooter. It's not even a debate. You said Bohannon would be the best shooter on ISU this year and pointed to his 3 pt % as to why. This year, JCL is shooting better from 3 than JBo.Exactly. For his career he is not as good as Bohannon.
Connor played 24 minutes. That's more than his season average. It's hilarious how you're just dying on this hill.When you were checking the box score, did you notice CJ Fredrick played 31 minutes?
Truth is probably somewhere in the middleI know and I'm saying that those teams shot very very bad beyond the arc (Wisconsin from 2), which obviously has a huge effect on points scored. As someone pointed out, Wisconsin was wide open a lot and just missed shots. That's part of the game of basketball, however good teams, particularly good shooting teams will capitalize on that.
Absolutely, and as I believe I said before, Iowa did what they were supposed to do against these teams.. Win the game and win them in a controlling fashion. Everyone can b**** and moan about how the teams weren't good and stuff like that. Iowa beat them and now has a few wonderful opportunities to help pad their resume going into the post season.Truth is probably somewhere in the middle
Which ISU fans are triggered?I didn't realize that Iowa winning against another ranked team, would have so many ISU fans triggered this morning.
All Iowa fans did on here during the football season was piss in our cheerios so we're returning the favor.I didn't realize that Iowa winning against another ranked team, would have so many ISU fans triggered this morning.