Iowa Football Recruiting

I'm not sure I don't work for either company. My assumption would be 247 invested more money into their product but that's just a guess

Nice dodge of the question. What makes you say Rivals, previously the best in the business, now isnt even close to 247? You must have something that makes you feel that way.
 
Nice dodge of the question. What makes you say Rivals, previously the best in the business, now isnt even close to 247? You must have something that makes you feel that way.
247 evaluates better and is now the leader in the industry
 
  • Like
Reactions: CyPunch
Nice dodge of the question. What makes you say Rivals, previously the best in the business, now isnt even close to 247? You must have something that makes you feel that way.

He has no reason at all other than Iowa's main site is Rivals and that is why he doesn't like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rebel
Breece Hall comes to mind. Brock Purdy was the lowest 3 star on Rivals when Bama wanted him. Downing was a horrible evaluation too. Milton was a low 2 star lol

So like 4 evaluations of ISU players made you change your thinking?

Seems logical considering how many kids they evaluate each year.

Also, Downing and Purdy were 3 star prospects by both services and 247 had Milton as the 231st best WR in his class and ranked #253 in the state of FL that year.

LOL!
 
So like 4 evaluations of ISU players made you change your thinking?

Seems logical considering how many kids they evaluate each year.

Also, Downing and Purdy were 3 star prospects by both services and 247 had Milton as the 231st best WR in his class and ranked #253 in the state of FL that year.

LOL!
Those are ones that just come to my mind. Breece Hall was a two star on Rivals for the longest time. They're just lazy. I don't think I'm in the minority when I say 247 is better at evaluating players
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CyPunch
The Hawks have had plenty of issues and plenty of recruiting misses this year. Yet, 247 still has their recruiting class 30 spots ahead of the Clones. Should we add 247 to our list of no longer trusted sources for cfb info?
I guess we'll find out.
Since the 2016 season, the hawks have been on average 10 spots higher in recruiting rankings per 247. And that has equated to zero CFP berths, zero conference titles, winning the division zero times, and 6 more total wins than ISU.

L.O.L
 
Since the 2016 season, the hawks have been on average 10 spots higher in recruiting rankings per 247. And that has equated to zero CFP berths, zero conference titles, winning the division zero times, and 6 more total wins than ISU.

L.O.L

The Right Way

Need to incorporate lawsuits paid out and coaches fired for being racist
 
Since the 2016 season, the hawks have been on average 10 spots higher in recruiting rankings per 247. And that has equated to zero CFP berths, zero conference titles, winning the division zero times, and 6 more total wins than ISU.

L.O.L

So you are admitting that Iowa has been better than ISU while having better recruiting classes since 2016. Seems obvious, but what am I missing?
 
So you are admitting that Iowa has been better than ISU while having better recruiting classes since 2016. Seems obvious, but what am I missing?

Only a hok fan would suggest the team without the conference title was better than the team with the conference title.

Of course, how would you know what it feels like to have your team at the top of the conference?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: motorcy90

Help Support Us

Become a patron