Iowa Football Recruiting

My ultimate wish is for ISU to be one of the first 4 left out of the NCAA Tournament. If ISU does manage to make the NCAA Tournament I wish it is as the #67 or #68 seed.

So you want Iowa State to land Smith? Just want to clarify this in case it happens and he ends up being very good in Ames
 
If you are counting 8-5 as a decent football season then how do you say, earlier in this thread, that Iowa basketball has only had 1 decent season in 10+ years?

Dont you consider making the Round of 32 at least a decent season in basketball?
You make it sound like counting 8-5 as a decent season isn't correct. Iowa has lived at 7-5 the last 20 years under fertenz. So are you saying those aren't decent seasons?

I would say my judgement for how i feel ISU did in the season can flux and isn't just based on the NCAA tournament, but is a weighted average for sure. The tournament is a crap shoot based on how lucky of a draw you get on who is in your region etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DhaCheann
So you want Iowa State to land Smith? Just want to clarify this in case it happens and he ends up being very good in Ames

It really doesn't bother me who ISU land actually. Well Foster hurt, so I don't like ISU landing players that Iowa wanted. The fact is if ISU misses on Smith and lands someone else, you will brag it up like it is the second coming. That's fine, ISU is gonna get players, they can't all be terrible like Nixon and Jacobson, and all the guys that transferred out that were said were gonna be studs.
 
The truth always hurts. ISU has 3 decent football seasons in the last 41 years, but wants to tell other fan bases they can't talk about basketball. LOL
We were talking about last 10+ years how bad iowa basketball has been and then because you got butthurt you had to talk ISU football and move the goal post of go further in the past where everyone knows we didn't have great coaches. Truly sad by you.
 
We were talking about last 10+ years how bad iowa basketball has been and then because you got butthurt you had to talk ISU football and move the goal post of go further in the past where everyone knows we didn't have great coaches. Truly sad by you.

Iowa was bad 10 years ago sure. Iowa has NCAA quality teams the last 5 out of 7 years, so who is the sad one making things up. The goal is always the NCAA Tournament.
 
Yeah we could spend time cherry picking data all we want to try and warp the argument to fit either side's narrative. I spent 20 minutes of my morning sifting through stats to find out Goodson averaged .04 more ypc against top-40 defenses. The stats do not lie, he was slightly better, but I don't know if that stat alone is good enough to base my entire argument off of. But it's not my argument so oh well.
I have a minor in statistics. What I mentioned isn't cherry picking data, let alone i never said Goodson was bad so I don't even have a narrative to fit. Maybe you aren't familiar with data and stats but looking at the data in more than one way and whats on the surface isn't cherry picking. Its getting a better understanding of whats going on.
 
You make it sound like counting 8-5 as a decent season isn't correct. Iowa has lived at 7-5 the last 20 years under fertenz. So are you saying those aren't decent seasons?

I would say my judgement for how i feel ISU did in the season can flux and isn't just based on the NCAA tournament, but is a weighted average for sure. The tournament is a crap shoot based on how lucky of a draw you get on who is in your region etc.

I didnt say that, 8-5 is decent in football.

Making the NCAA tournament is a decent season in basketball. Each game you win in the tourney moves the season up a notch.
 
You make it sound like counting 8-5 as a decent season isn't correct. Iowa has lived at 7-5 the last 20 years under fertenz. So are you saying those aren't decent seasons?

I would say my judgement for how i feel ISU did in the season can flux and isn't just based on the NCAA tournament, but is a weighted average for sure. The tournament is a crap shoot based on how lucky of a draw you get on who is in your region etc.
It's literally all about perspective. When we won the Big 12 tournament and then lost in the first round of the NCAA two year's ago, people were pissed and were calling for Prohm to be fired. 4 years ago when we won the Big 12 Tournament and lost in the second round of the NCAA tournament by 4 to Purdue, people were criticizing Prohm for his in-game coaching and were pissed off.

On the other hand, two years ago Iowa loses in the second round to Tennessee and people are ecstatic. This past year for Iowa, it felt like Iowa was one of the best teams in the nation based on how Iowa fans were reacting, yet they were most likely going to be a 5-6 seed in the tournament.

It's flip flop for football where expectations at Iowa are a little above where they are for Iowa State. We're all hypocritical.
 
Okay so after doing some research about SP+ Top-40 defenses as they pertain to both ISU and Iowa, both Iowa State and Iowa played 6 SP+ Top-40 defenses.

Iowa: Iowa State, Michigan, Penn State, Wisconsin, Minnesota and USC

Iowa State: Iowa, Baylor, OU, Oklahoma State, Texas, Notre Dame

Goodson
Iowa State - 3 carries, 16 yds
Michigan - 6 carries, 15 yds
Penn State - 8 carries, 35 yds
Wisconsin - 5 carries, 26 yds
Minnesota - 13 carries, 94 yds, 1 TD
USC - 18 carries, 48 yds, 1 TD

ypc: 4.42

Hall
Iowa - 1 carry, 0 yds
Baylor - DNP
OU - 18 carries, 110 yards
Oklahoma State - 18 carries, 76 yds, 2 TD
Texas - 24 carries, 101 yds
Notre Dame - 17 carries, 55 yds

ypc: 4.38

So, assuming these numbers are correct, and I'll post my reference link, you're saying that because Goodson averaged .04 more yards per carry than Hall against better defenses, he's therefore overall better? From my standpoint looking at these numbers, Goodson is a specialty back who's used in certain situations but can't be relied upon to carry the ball very much. The best running back on Iowa is rarely getting the ball against good teams.. Could be a variety of reasons for that but that's just the truth.

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/ncaa/fplus/2019

Thats not correct. That is not SP+.
 
I have a minor in statistics. What I mentioned isn't cherry picking data, let alone i never said Goodson was bad so I don't even have a narrative to fit. Maybe you aren't familiar with data and stats but looking at the data in more than one way and whats on the surface isn't cherry picking. Its getting a better understanding of whats going on.
Haha I think you thought what I was saying was a slight towards you! It was actually towards whoever I was in this argument with. I'm familiar with statistics as well. I was saying that all of us could pick and choose what we want to try and show who's better, but in the end, an Iowa fan would have to break it down and spend 20 minutes out of their life to try and prove that their running back averages .04 yds more against tough defenses.

I in no means was trying to demean you or what you were saying, but I apologize you took it that way.
 
Iowa was bad 10 years ago sure. Iowa has NCAA quality teams the last 5 out of 7 years, so who is the sad one making things up. The goal is always the NCAA Tournament.
Good to know your goal is just to make it there. ISU's is at least sweet 16's. Thats the difference between the two programs I guess.

Also, just an FYI, you keep lying when you say 5 out of the last 7. You only made it 4 times in the last 10+ years. 2014, 2015, 2016, 2019. Which 2014, you were the first four (LOL, thats a play in game to get INTO the tournament) which you lost. Then 15,16,19 you made to second round. Congrats
 
It's literally all about perspective. When we won the Big 12 tournament and then lost in the first round of the NCAA two year's ago, people were pissed and were calling for Prohm to be fired. 4 years ago when we won the Big 12 Tournament and lost in the second round of the NCAA tournament by 4 to Purdue, people were criticizing Prohm for his in-game coaching and were pissed off.

On the other hand, two years ago Iowa loses in the second round to Tennessee and people are ecstatic. This past year for Iowa, it felt like Iowa was one of the best teams in the nation based on how Iowa fans were reacting, yet they were most likely going to be a 5-6 seed in the tournament.

It's flip flop for football where expectations at Iowa are a little above where they are for Iowa State. We're all hypocritical.

This is pretty true. Hawk fans didn't even think it would be a NCAA year when Iowa took the #2 seed into OT in the second round. That felt like a good performance for that years team. If Iowa loses in round 2 this year, it will feel more disappointing for sure.

Yet getting to the NCAA is never a "disappointing year" for schools like ISU and Iowa.
 
Good to know your goal is just to make it there. ISU's is at least sweet 16's. Thats the difference between the two programs I guess.

Also, just an FYI, you keep lying when you say 5 out of the last 7. You only made it 4 times in the last 10+ years. 2014, 2015, 2016, 2019. Which 2014, you were the first four (LOL, thats a play in game to get INTO the tournament) which you lost. Then 15,16,19 you made to second round. Congrats

Quit pretending that ISU's basketball standard is sweet 16's. 2 out of the last 3 years ISU has been garbage and ISU fans would be ecstatic to be the #68 seed this year.
 
This is pretty true. Hawk fans didn't even think it would be a NCAA year when Iowa took the #2 seed into OT in the second round. That year like a good performance for that years team. If Iowa loses in round 2 this year, it will feel more disappointing for sure.

Yet getting to the NCAA is never a "disappointing year" for schools like ISU and Iowa.
We all have fans that like to live in the dumps. Iowa fans have those for football too.. There were idiot Iowa fans calling for Kirk's head when he was winning 7-8 games too. It happens everywhere lol.
 
Haha I think you thought what I was saying was a slight towards you! It was actually towards whoever I was in this argument with. I'm familiar with statistics as well. I was saying that all of us could pick and choose what we want to try and show who's better, but in the end, an Iowa fan would have to break it down and spend 20 minutes out of their life to try and prove that their running back averages .04 yds more against tough defenses.

I in no means was trying to demean you or what you were saying, but I apologize you took it that way.
Understood. Thanks for clarifying. My apologies
 
Yeah we could spend time cherry picking data all we want to try and warp the argument to fit either side's narrative. I spent 20 minutes of my morning sifting through stats to find out Goodson averaged .04 more ypc against top-40 defenses. The stats do not lie, he was slightly better, but I don't know if that stat alone is good enough to base my entire argument off of. But it's not my argument so oh well.

I would take Hall over Goodson right now, but they both still have three years left to play and both have a lot of upside so we will see who will have the better career or even year next year.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron