Coronavirus Coronavirus: In-Iowa General Discussion (Not Limited)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Since this is an Iowa thread, I will just say one thing: I'm glad I live in Iowa.

I don't expect looting, hoarding, or Lord of the Flies scenarios here. (And that will happen in some places here and there I think)

I expect that younger folks will go out and do the stuff that needs be done (food production, utilities, public safety, etc).
I expect people will go the extra mile to help older and at-risk folks stay home and safe.
I expect people will work from home when possible, wash their hands like they're supposed to, and stay home when they feel sick.

No panic - just good old midwest common sense and community in the face of fear.
My mom texted me today no eggs or bread.
Carry on.
 
Hey T-Bone is my friend. A great bartender and a hard working guy. I understand what you are saying. I think his thoughts were to give people some normalcy on St Paddy’s.

✌️❤️
 
Since this is an Iowa thread, I will just say one thing: I'm glad I live in Iowa.

I don't expect looting, hoarding, or Lord of the Flies scenarios here. (And that will happen in some places here and there I think)

I expect that younger folks will go out and do the stuff that needs be done (food production, utilities, public safety, etc).
I expect people will go the extra mile to help older and at-risk folks stay home and safe.
I expect people will work from home when possible, wash their hands like they're supposed to, and stay home when they feel sick.

No panic - just good old midwest common sense and community in the face of fear.

"Invincible" college students is one of my concerns. Otherwise I think most people will do their best to isolate.
 
Yeah I did if you read the information I posted. It states "Coronaviruses are a large family of viruses that are common in people and many different species of animals, including camels, cattle, cats, and bats". Thanks for reading. Just like the flu and other viruses and such, they gather the information and report what they have confirmed and then later give an estimate on the number of people who actually had it or do have it.

I would like to have you link the information sites that you are gathering your information from so it makes it easier to compare. I have shared mine, don't remember if you have, so I kindly ask you to post yours so I can read it/them and compare the information and find out where the CDC is wrong.

You're drifting again. Stay focused. This is nothing more than a simple yes or no.

The CDC says as of Friday that confirmed cases in the US total 1,629. It's linked right there on the page you linked to earlier. Today's number is at 2,900+ as reported in other outlets, among them the NYT tracker. As best I can tell every source is all using the same data, it's just a matter of how frequently they are updated.

Yes or no: do believe that those numbers of confirmed cases of coronavirus (Covid-19) is truly representative of the actual number of cases currently in the US?
 
You're drifting again. Stay focused. This is nothing more than a simple yes or no.

The CDC says as of Friday that confirmed cases in the US total 1,629. It's linked right there on the page you linked to earlier. Today's number is at 2,900+ as reported in other outlets, among them the NYT tracker. As best I can tell every source is all using the same data, it's just a matter of how frequently they are updated.

Yes or no: do believe that those numbers of confirmed cases of coronavirus (Covid-19) is truly representative of the actual number of cases currently in the US?


As the article said, people will have symptoms and not even know, so no, that number does not include those to my understanding. I am trying to understand what you are getting at. Apparantly you are saying the CDC is over-reporting the severity of this? Since if they only put the number of confirmed cases and the deaths from that. If we go by the flu rate of they estimate 10x roughly on that. That would bump the mortality rate down to similar to that of the flu. Are you trying to suggest that this is the same as the flu by saying the CDC underestimates the cases?
 
As the article said, people will have symptoms and not even know, so no, that number does not include those to my understanding. I am trying to understand what you are getting at. Apparantly you are saying the CDC is over-reporting the severity of this? Since if they only put the number of confirmed cases and the deaths from that. If we go by the flu rate of they estimate 10x roughly on that. That would bump the mortality rate down to similar to that of the flu. Are you trying to suggest that this is the same as the flu by saying the CDC underestimates the cases?

Wut
 
As the article said, people will have symptoms and not even know, so no, that number does not include those to my understanding. I am trying to understand what you are getting at. Apparantly you are saying the CDC is over-reporting the severity of this? Since if they only put the number of confirmed cases and the deaths from that. If we go by the flu rate of they estimate 10x roughly on that. That would bump the mortality rate down to similar to that of the flu. Are you trying to suggest that this is the same as the flu by saying the CDC underestimates the cases?

Please do not go by the influenza numbers; yes, there are some number of cases we do not know about yet, but please don't just assume this is like influenza. By all accounts the fatality rate is higher with COVID-19.

CDC estimates of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic had averages of 60 million infected, 270,000 hospitalized, and 12,470 deaths. That means a case fatality rate around 0.02%.

For this outbreak to be similar to H1N1 influenza, the 63 reported deaths in the US so far would be 0.02% of 315,000 infections.....or 92 times the currently reported case numbers.

Please, please do not compare this to influenza in any way.
 
As the article said, people will have symptoms and not even know, so no, that number does not include those to my understanding. I am trying to understand what you are getting at. Apparantly you are saying the CDC is over-reporting the severity of this? Since if they only put the number of confirmed cases and the deaths from that. If we go by the flu rate of they estimate 10x roughly on that. That would bump the mortality rate down to similar to that of the flu. Are you trying to suggest that this is the same as the flu by saying the CDC underestimates the cases?

Let's take this from the beginning.

In this post you mock @WhoISthis for implying that the data on coronavirus cases in the US is not useful for decision-making at this present time.

I've been asking you ever since if you believe that it is. Finally, after much effort, you seemed to say that no, it is not reliable - which puts you in agreement with @WhoISthis.

The point is this: it's not that the CDC is lying to us, or passing along bad data. It's that the data itself is incomplete because 1) we have far few tests for people who need them, so there's no way we are capturing all actual coronaviruses cases in these numbers, and 2) even if we had the tests we need, it's a lagging indicator and that "confirmed case" has likely infected numerous others by the time the test is confirmed.

So given all that, it doesn't make sense for the CDC to issue guidance on public gatherings or school closure recommendations based on that data, because the data itself is unreliable. That's why you see governors like Ohio's taking action based on what they know is coming rather than the unreliable data they have now.

Finally, I'm not talking about influenza in any way, shape, or form.
 
This will be a critical week for the rural schools across the state. Unlike the urban schools, that are on spring break, many rural schools are still on the Easter break schedule.
If cases across the state stay flat, we will continue to go, if they spike this week, then we will be closing them down. It could go either way, I know I at my school, around 50% of the kids have internet access at home, difficult, but not impossible to do distance learning. Plus like many rural schools, we are above 50% for free and reduced lunch, if they cancel school we are going to have to come up with a way to get lunch out to those students.

We are just starting this pandemic, here in the US, its going to get a lot worse before its gets better in my opinion.

The problem with online school is FAPE. Districts would have to provide devices (which many already do) and wireless access to kids, at least those without it at home. Maybe for all. Public education has to be free. That is a lot of hotspots needed.

In my opinion, you either tack the time on to the end or you forgive it entirely. Unless the feds are going to provide economic help in providing wireless access, online learning at the K-12 level won’t happen.
 
Please do not go by the influenza numbers; yes, there are some number of cases we do not know about yet, but please don't just assume this is like influenza. By all accounts the fatality rate is higher with COVID-19.

CDC estimates of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic had averages of 60 million infected, 270,000 hospitalized, and 12,470 deaths. That means a case fatality rate around 0.02%.

For this outbreak to be similar to H1N1 influenza, the 63 reported deaths in the US so far would be 0.02% of 315,000 infections.....or 92 times the currently reported case numbers.

Please, please do not compare this to influenza in any way.


I was not, I was asking what the point was of the person I replied to. It seemed like he felt for every case that was reported there were several that were not. I think there are some, but not at that level. My MIL, about 10 days ago, went to the clinic to see if she had it since she had a stuffy nose. Last I saw there were 62 deaths with 3200 approximately reported cases. Quick math puts that at 2%. (US wise, I prefer that since I don't know all health regs and situations of other countries) Unless the thought is that there are several deaths not getting reported, I don't get what his point is about there being a bunch of people who have it that just won't report. Maybe he feels they aren't reporting true cases, I honestly don't know.

When someone wants to say that there are a bunch of people who have it and will never know and won't show the symptoms, it kinda gives the impression that it isn't as bad as it is.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RealisticCy
Let's take this from the beginning.

In this post you mock @WhoISthis for implying that the data on coronavirus cases in the US is not useful for decision-making at this present time.

I've been asking you ever since if you believe that it is. Finally, after much effort, you seemed to say that no, it is not reliable - which puts you in agreement with @WhoISthis.

The point is this: it's not that the CDC is lying to us, or passing along bad data. It's that the data itself is incomplete because 1) we have far few tests for people who need them, so there's no way we are capturing all actual coronaviruses cases in these numbers, and 2) even if we had the tests we need, it's a lagging indicator and that "confirmed case" has likely infected numerous others by the time the test is confirmed.

So given all that, it doesn't make sense for the CDC to issue guidance on public gatherings or school closure recommendations based on that data, because the data itself is unreliable. That's why you see governors like Ohio's taking action based on what they know is coming rather than the unreliable data they have now.

Finally, I'm not talking about influenza in any way, shape, or form.

I gave you the yes or no answer, now please link places that you are basing you information from. And once again you twist things. I NEVER said the information from CDC was unreliable. You asked me if the numbers were accurate, that is what I replied to. If you are going to twist stuff that much, I am just ignoring you. That is a complete twist and lie there.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: RedDog
I gave you the yes or no answer, now please link places that you are basing you information from.

My information that we don't have enough tests? It's literally everywhere. Is that the fact you're challenging here, because hoo boy
 
I gave you the yes or no answer, now please link places that you are basing you information from. And once again you twist things. I NEVER said the information from CDC was unreliable. You asked me if the numbers were accurate, that is what I replied to. If you are going to twist stuff that much, I am just ignoring you. That is a complete twist and lie there.

Sigh.

I'm not twisting anything. I think we're in agreement that the information from the CDC is accurate - as in, nobody doubts that is the real count.

But while that it is true, it is also true that we are not testing nearly enough people. So those numbers, while accurate, underrepresent what's actually happening.

So it's the best we have. But it isn't good for making decisions on. Which is why smart politicians are shutting things down now, because it's likely already far worse out there than anyone realizes.
 
I have reason to believe that the Council Bluffs Community School District and the Lewis Central Community School Districts will have school tomorrow and then be closed at least for the remainder of the week and the next week. Perhaps more school districts will be joining them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron