Graham Couch: Iowa Basketball is a mid-major roster

I'm not going to take anything away from what Fran has done this year with Iowa. I think he's done a great job. Him and Prohm are however in different situations and should be judged differently.

I think everyone, including Prohm, thought that Nixon was going to be better than what he currently is. He's been flat out awful and almost unplayable. Sure he was playing down a level but he had a full year to get better at certain areas of his game and he didn't. He was suppose to be a good defender and I think because his offensive game is terrible, he now doesn't play defense. So, that's now requiring Prohm to dip into the freshman who frankly aren't ready to contribute a ton.

Another problem that we thought we'd have would be at that 4 position. Conditt, Jacobson, and Solomon are all 5's but Jacobson has played the 4 most of the year and he has not been good there at all. So now we're bringing in Lewis and Griffin, who have shown glimpses of ability in the past but not quite enough to substantiate quality playing time. However, because that 4 position is not producing at all on offense and struggling to defend on defense, we are starting to play Griffin and Lewis more because they're starting to provide a little bit more of a spark.

As far as Conditt goes, he's been pretty darn good at being a rim protector, but teams are now starting to try and stretch him out and get him out of the lane and he's struggled with that. Offensively, he hasn't been able to find much of a groove either and overall gets himself into foul trouble. Over the last few games Solomon has been really good and is making it very very hard for Prohm to take him out of the game and because of that, Conditt's minutes have gone down a little bit.

A coach is always going to be judged on W/L's or should be anyway. I think Prohm has enough pieces at ISU that it should be a NCAA tournament team. I'm not sure why there are so many on here that seem to excuse Prohm this year.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Statefan10
I think if he was on a better overall team his numbers would be increased. I think it's also important to note that Tyrese is not a guy who's going score 20 ppg a night.. that's just not the type of player he is. He'd be averaging a double double if he'd have more capable shooters.

I think the problem is ISU's start player is taking the same amount of shots as ISU "good" player. Garza takes the most shots at Iowa, because duh he is the Iowa's player. It is much harder to find shots for a C, than it is a PG. There really is no excuse that Bolton takes nearly as many shots as Haliburton takes.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: iahawks
You will miss him. He is very good but those are not elite numbers.

His numbers are absolutely elite, especially if you look at some advanced stats. He's first the Big 12 in assist and steals. His PER is 26.1, which is great for a guard because that's a stat usually dominated by big men. He's second in the Big 12 in points produced per game.

You just have to take into account what he's working with. You put him on a different roster and he's averaging double digit assists per game easily. And if you had other threats on the floor I think his scoring would greatly increase.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Statefan10
I think the problem is ISU's start player is taking the same amount of shots as ISU "good" player. Garza takes the most shots at Iowa, because duh he is the Iowa's player. It is much harder to find shots for a C, than it is a PG. There really is no excuse that Bolton takes nearly as many shots as Haliburton takes.

I don't think the bolded is true at all.
 
A coach is always going to be judged on W/L's or should be anyway. I think Prohm has enough pieces at ISU that it should be a NCAA tournament team. I'm not sure why there are so many on here that seem to excuse Prohm this year.
It's Prohm fault in some way regardless of whether or not he has an NCAA tournament roster because he's the one building it. I agree and believe as well that looking at this team on a macro level, we should be a tournament team but unfortunately we're not. I sound like a broken record when I say this but for the makeup of this roster / team, we have got to be able to knock down the 3pt shot to compete and win games and we are not good in that category at all.

When you have a bunch of undersized guards, they have to be able to stretch the defense and make shots beyond the arc because you can't rely on them to be able to consistently make contested jumpers and layups over taller defenders.
 
I think the problem is ISU's start player is taking the same amount of shots as ISU "good" player. Garza takes the most shots at Iowa, because duh he is the Iowa's player. It is much harder to find shots for a C, than it is a PG. There really is no excuse that Bolton takes nearly as many shots as Haliburton takes.
Actually Bolton has played pretty well in the month of January and Halliburton is not a guy who's going to take 20 shots a game. He's just not.
 
How do I find them?

He's not in the top 25 in the Big Ten in points in the final 4 min and it's not like he's scoring the 6 min before that

You are making the claim he disappears the last 10 minutes of the game. I figured you had some stats to back it up.
 
You are making the claim he disappears the last 10 minutes of the game. I figured you had some stats to back it up.

I mean I've shown multiple games where he's done it but no I don't know of a season long tracking system for it. If you had it that would be great!
 
You are making the claim he disappears the last 10 minutes of the game. I figured you had some stats to back it up.

Does this help?

giphy.gif
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron