Not sure about that, just doubt he will be 1st team All Conference, that typically goes to the QB of the team that finishes 1st in the conference.
If you don't think he'll be first team you have to think he'll be second team
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure about that, just doubt he will be 1st team All Conference, that typically goes to the QB of the team that finishes 1st in the conference.
Avg Nov/Dec defense Iowa played: 49th
Avg Nov/Dec defense ISU played: 66th
The one Top 25 defense ISU played during that time his stat line was 17/30 - 56.7%, 0/0, 222 yards, 1 fumble, -16 rushing yards, and got the offense 9 points.
If you don't think he'll be first team you have to think he'll be second team
Avg Nov/Dec defense Iowa played: 49th
Avg Nov/Dec defense ISU played: 66th
The one Top 25 defense ISU played during that time his stat line was 17/30 - 56.7%, 0/0, 222 yards, 1 fumble, -16 rushing yards, and got the offense 9 points.
Well I would hope he doesn't regress this year and not be 2nd team all conference.
I'm asking what you think he'll be pre-season All Conference
I'm asking what you think he'll be pre-season All Conference
-16 yards rushing? I thought Purdy was more mobile than that?
Purdy has the same injury and had to leave the game against ND.
I'd say probably unless Ehlinger/OU QB get the 1st and 2nd team honors. You are talking pre season? I am talking about who actually wins the 1st team all conference QB position next year.
Whoever the transfer QB for Oklahoma is next year would be my guess.
Brock wasn't fully healthy and I think we that in how he was timid running sometimes, especially in the final 2 games of the year. He didn't look the same against KSU and ND, however in the KSU game there were 40 mph winds and in the ND game we played the #3 pass defense in the nation.Seems right on with Stanley's career stats. Purdy's numbers were clearly down and that is why I said he regressed as the season wore on. He didn't seem the same.
I was talking preseason although I think he'll be first team at the end of the season too
I think he has a better chance at Pre Season 1st team QB than he does end of season.
The bowl season really highlights it this year, but do you really think the B12 will be as down next year? There is a chance the conference only has two teams in the Top 25 at the end of this year, and one of them is about to lose a coaching staff. I think you guys could do big things if there continues to be a slump.Yeah a guy who's going to be first team all conference in the preseason is more than just good IMO
Yeah a guy who's going to be first team all conference in the preseason is more than just good IMO
Good for Purdy, lets see if he can put up wins along with inflated numbers.
The bowl season really highlights it this year, but do you really think the B12 will be as down next year? There is a chance the conference only has two teams in the Top 25 at the end of this year, and one of them is about to lose a coaching staff. I think you guys could do big things if there continues to be a slump.
Right, Purdy did not play that well against the #15 defense that's terrific defending the pass. I'll agree. He did not put up a TD and that's not good. That was also the one game this year Purdy didn't have a TD. Nate Stanley didn't have a TD in 5 games this year. Three of them being against the #66 Nebraska defense, the #80 Illinois defense, and the #99 Purdue defense.Avg Nov/Dec defense Iowa played: 49th
Avg Nov/Dec defense ISU played: 66th
The one Top 25 defense ISU played during that time his stat line was 17/30 - 56.7%, 0/0, 222 yards, 1 fumble, -16 rushing yards, and got the offense 9 points.
How are his numbers inflated?
Brock has 249 yards and 8 TD's this year on the ground. Stanley has -117 and 2 TD's in his career. Lol c'mon man.-16 yards rushing? I thought Purdy was more mobile than that?