Probably pretty good offenses and garbage defenses = a much tougher schedule than you. So you guys face garbage offenses and garbage defenses?
Iowa has faced tougher defenses and worse offenses so far than ISU.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably pretty good offenses and garbage defenses = a much tougher schedule than you. So you guys face garbage offenses and garbage defenses?
Iowa has faced tougher defenses and worse offenses so far than ISU.
So Iowa's faced offenses that are even worse than the "garbage" defenses we've faced?
I would say that is accurate so far.
I will also say SOS ranking can be very misleading. Right now OSU has a SOS of 16 and has only played one top 10 team. LSU has a SOS of 27 and has played 3 top ten teams. But the other foes LSU has played are really really bad which drags down their SOS. If those other teams were in the 50s instead of the 80s and 100s, then their SOS would be very much improved while also posing no threat of losing the game.
So what word should we be using to describe the offenses Iowa faces that's worse than "garbage"? Like if I wanted to say Epenesa still can't put up numbers vs__________ offenses what word should we use?
Um what?Good question. Guards have been horrible. That sack yardage doesn't count run total anyway according to JP4CY.
Some have been non-existent like NW's was. Glad Iowa took care of business, but NW has zero offense this year.
You didn't answer my question. What word should we use that's worse than garbage to describe what Epenesa and Phil Parker are seeing this year?
When you play offenses as potent as the ones in the Big12, they will always be able to score some.NW and Rutgers have been putrid. But Iowa's defense is pretty good this year. Don't understand the hate for Parker at all. He is a great DC.
How would you rate ISU's defense so far? Seems their tackling hasn't been very good, but I've only seen some highlights.
NW and Rutgers have been putrid. But Iowa's defense is pretty good this year. Don't understand the hate for Parker at all. He is a great DC.
How would you rate ISU's defense so far? Seems their tackling hasn't been very good, but I've only seen some highlights.
B1G teams can't score at all so when they play each other it looks like some amazing defense. I mean, the mighty Hoks could only put 20pts on a 1-6 Northwestern Team.
When you play offenses as potent as the ones in the Big12, they will always be able to score some.
Once again you didn't answer my question. What word can we use worse than "garbage" to describe what Iowa's seeing this year
I said Rutgers and NW have putrid offenses. I answered it.
26 pts vs. Wash St, Akron, and Drake is struggling to score? You do know that Iowa averages 24 pts per game, right?I've watched you guys struggle to score vs Iowa, Wash St, Akron, UNI, Drake, but then drop 30+, 40+, 50+ on Big 12 teams. Why can you light up the scoreboards against the Big 12 but you can't vs supposedly inferior defenses?
26 pts vs. Wash St, Akron, and Drake is struggling to score? You do know that Iowa averages 24 pts per game, right?
bumpI've watched you guys struggle to score vs Iowa, Wash St, Akron, UNI, Drake, but then drop 30+, 40+, 50+ on Big 12 teams. Why can you light up the scoreboards against the Big 12 but you can't vs supposedly inferior defenses?
Come on. You're above making up bulls***.
Dude. Don't you know they're putting 10 men on Epenesa? If the QB didn't have to hold the ball, he would be right there helping block against The Incredible Bust.So Brock Purdy is putting up elite numbers vs garbage defenses and Epenesa is a non factor vs putrid offenses?
Yeah Eppy is a letdown this year. If he was playing a bit better Iowa might have a top 10 defense. Oh...they do have a top 10 defense? Well still, come on get more stats AJ.Dude. Don't you know they're putting 10 men on Epenesa? If the QB didn't have to hold the ball, he would be right there helping block against The Incredible Bust.