The infamous holding call

So what gives this Iowa win an asterisk? Is it the two weather delays? The holding call?
 
Was the game stopped for him as an injured player?
Honestly that was the one thing that I thought maybe I missed, but I seem to remember the trainers running out to him. It was a pretty quick thing though since it was just cramps, so maybe the refs didn't officially count him as injured. If you ever see the replay (I'd rather not watch any of that game again lol) let me know if I was mistaken. Obviously not a huge play but it just seemed to show some of the overall incompetence of the refs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lemmiwinks
So what gives this Iowa win an asterisk? Is it the two weather delays? The holding call?
No asterisks, they way we were stepping on our own feet there are no guarantees we would have taken advantage. Holding calls and PI's are always subject to "in the eye of the beholder". However the helmet to helmet and the allowing an injured player(if true) back in before a play has been run show either the turning of the heads or incompetence. Either rightly opens up anything else to question.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: motorcy90
Yeah, it was pretty poor "coverage" but D- might be a little harsh. He got away with it so can't hold it against him. It's an unfortunate call, but what can you do?

ca5a10668d79da0b53d44182304d0585-full.jpg

That contact wasn’t any worse than the long pass to Scates on ISU’s second drive.
 
You might be right, but do you have a link to it?

I do not, however, the injury happened in the back of the endzone and he was actually laying out of play when the trainers got to him. I remember specifically thinking that he is off the field game should resume. Especially since we had been running hurry up with no substitutions to make sure Iowa couldn't make any subs to the defensive line. The game stopped, and when it finally did resume Iowa State called a timeout.
 
No asterisks, they way we were stepping on our own feet there are no guarantees we would have taken advantage. Holding calls and PI's are always subject to "in the eye of the beholder". However the helmet to helmet and the allowing an injured player(if true) back in before a play has been run show either the turning of the heads or incompetence. Either rightly opens up anything else to question.

They paid them. That's what happened.
 
So much this. Tons of people don't understand the difference between a bad call that happened in the first quarter versus one that happens on the last drive and last down of a one-posession game. If a team gets a bad call in the first quarter, they have time to recover and adjust. Last down? Not really. People need to stop saying both things are equal.

I just hope it is a coping mechanism that results in wanting to weight every snap of the game equally. When it’s a one point game, literally any play is possibly a game changer by virtue of what did or did not happen. But that’s bull ****.

That call is one of many plays that needed to go Iowa’s way to win. Just like we needed most of the breaks to go our way against OU in 2017, or UNI needed several to nearly win in Game 1. The issue with plays like that one is it wasn’t influenced by either team.
 
Saw this being retweeted, pay no attention to the block in the back by 3 that took out two cyclones.


Scratching backs and bearhugs by offensive lineman are just tough Big Ten football. Only in a pissy little conference like the Big Twelve are those considered penalties.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron