All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition
- Thread starter YeahBuddy
- Start date
Although Rutgers is terrible, it's still college football and anything can happen. If Iowa plays well on both sides of the football, the score will take care of itself. If Iowa plays poorly and Rutgers plays their best game, the game could be close. Either way, I don't think this Rutgers game has anything to do with what Iowa team will come to Ames on September 14.
That's why you play the games.. If games were played on paper, most games wouldn't be played.
Does PFF have access to game tape from each college or are they going off of broadcast only? Since it's largely subjective, is the same person grading each position or how does that work?
My understanding is they do not have access to All 22 type video and only work off of broadcast footage.
Although a team like Rutgers or Kansas are in the P5, teams like UNI, SDSU, and NDSU are extremely well coached football teams that can give any P5 team fits. They are established, play hard every single play, and are very disciplined.
1. Does PFF have access to game tape from each college or are they going off of broadcast only? - What don't you understand about this?
2. Since it's largely subjective, is the same person grading each position or how does that work? - For example, In week 1, was the same person grading Stanley the same person that graded Purdy?
I don't fully know how passing efficiency works either and I use that a lot
I agree, but it still doesn’t mean you can take them for granted. I feel Iowa shouldn’t have much of a problem with Rutgers, but at the same time I’ve seen enough Iowa games to not take any of them for granted. Not sure why ISU fans would feel different considering their last two regular season games.
I've been an ISU fan long enough to not take any game for granted whether that be basketball or football. I've seen great Iowa State basketball teams struggle with lower tier teams too. Great teams find a way to win one way or another.
For future reference: PFF is largely subjective, with exception to when it helps prove my point.
They don't fully know what a player's assignment is on any given play. I've got to assume that either one guy doesn't sleep or they have different guys valuing different players. So what one person says is a +, may not be a + in another's book... Also, there's speculation that they don't have full access to video. Which one mean that they don't get the full scope on every play.
How much do you post on the Rutgers sites? The Wisconsin sites? Minnesota? Nebraska? Illinois?
The list goes on and on