Well they would've won their bowl game if Grier would've played in the game, so that would've been a ranked team. They also were played lights out at the end of the year against OU and came up short. Also Texas ended up beating Georgia who was the 2nd best team in the SEC last year in their bowl game so I'd say a win against Texas was a good win.
I do not think he is a good coach, I think he is set up to have a good year and has good players coming back. I think he could be decent this year and based on his past I feel like he can win some games.
Yeah I guess it could be debatable. Just trying to throw em a bone. They can't fathom that ISU is actually good. Tears em apart.
That is literally such a cop out argument. It was a bigger disadvantage to Wazzu than it was to Washington. It changed the game.
Actually the only hypothetical part of that post was that WVU would've won if they had one of the best QB's in the nation actually play in the game. If you don't think that would've changed things then that's fine.
Kill and Claeys would coach circles around him.
A lot of people would not have been impressed with ISU during the TCU game or the Iowa game either.
Maybe in that post, but there are so many what if arguments about ISU being better than so and so and this and that. It is hypocritical to get after someone else for doing the same things.
Who cant? I said ISU is good, but I do not think they are above all of these big 10 teams that you guys are saying.
