I guess Iowa's collapse will start in March this year...

Status
Not open for further replies.
It will be interesting to see what happens. It is really hard to read this Iowa team. It feels like the range of outcomes is very difficult to project game-game. I have watched two of their games and don't have a good feel for who they are.

Terrible road team and a good home team. Someone said that defense travels. Well Iowa struggles to play defense and thus are usually pretty horrible on the road. Kind of a jeckyl and hyde type team.
 
Nothings a safe bet but...

Hawks are currently

RPI-37
NET-27
KenPom--30
Sagarin--35

5-5 the rest of the way probably is a safe bet if we avoid the bad home loss.

Iowa does control their own destiny in some regard and if they don't go at least 5-5 don't deserve to be in the tourney even if the metrics are debatable.

Part of the issue for Iowa is they did have at the time notable wins over ranked team when they played but have since become less than impressive (Oregon and OSU for example) and now since those team have fallen off their metrics are going to look a lot worse come selection Sunday. Nebby and OSU for instance had top 10 NET's early but I could see ending up at the 50's or worse in March. That will be reflected in EIU resume when they are making their field of 64 case.
Fran has work left to do and really needs a signature win vs UM or UW for both the committee and the fan base.
 
Looking at the remaining schedule and if the Hawks go 5-5 I think the critical element is obviously sweeping Rutgers. Can't lose to them....

You can mix the other games up at 3-5 and still do enough. Probably need to beat NW at home as well. Nothing else really takes a serious hit on the metrics as long as we win 5. Not comfortable at 4-6 down the stretch at all....might need to win 2 in the BTT depending on who the opponents are...

If one of those 4 wins was Michigan, that would soften the blow from an unexpected loss. Friday isn't a must win or anything close but it would some pressure off the Hawks. In that scenario they could more or less win out at home, plus one game in Chicago or on the road and be comfy.

If those wins are something like Rutgers x2, NW and Indy or Maryland at home, the b1g tourney could make or break their NCAA chances.

I think they go 6-4, maybe 7-3. Wins over NW, Rutgers x2, Terps, Indiana and they split @tOSU/Nebby. Wouldn't shock me if they win the rest of their road games, Wisconsin would be the one I'd think most likely to be a loss. Nebraska is done w/o Copeland,Fran teams traditionally play well vs Ohio State and Indiana has lost 6 straight games, they are a train wreck.
 
Terrible road team and a good home team. Someone said that defense travels. Well Iowa struggles to play defense and thus are usually pretty horrible on the road. Kind of a jeckyl and hyde type team.

A good home team already has two home losses?
 
It will be interesting to see what happens. It is really hard to read this Iowa team. It feels like the range of outcomes is very difficult to project game-game. I have watched two of their games and don't have a good feel for who they are.
You and me both...
 
Iowa isn't a bad home team but they aren't a good home team. They are pretty much the definition of mediocre across the board honestly

I think they have been better than mediocre thus far. Bad road team and good home team.
 
Iowa does control their own destiny in some regard and if they don't go at least 5-5 don't deserve to be in the tourney even if the metrics are debatable.

Part of the issue for Iowa is they did have at the time notable wins over ranked team when they played but have since become less than impressive (Oregon and OSU for example) and now since those team have fallen off their metrics are going to look a lot worse come selection Sunday. Nebby and OSU for instance had top 10 NET's early but I could see ending up at the 50's or worse in March. That will be reflected in EIU resume when they are making their field of 64 case.
Fran has work left to do and really needs a signature win vs UM or UW for both the committee and the fan base.
The thing about the metrics is that once conference play starts they're pretty baked in....for instance Nebraska....they drop off and essentially exchange those metrics with another conference team. It's why conference SOS doesn't really change once the conference season starts. B1G is #2 to the B12 in that regard which is a major improvement from last year.

OSU beats Nebraska....Nebraska goes down OSU up...basically a wash for Iowa. more variance in that regard v the B12 because it isn't a round robin but basically holds true.

Oregon, UCONN, Pitt falling on their faces could effect things but if they stay around where they're at pretty much zero effect.

ISU continuing to win wouldn't hurt things :)
 
A good home team doesn't have two losses, one of them was a blowout loss at home. Sorry you can't understand that

Where do you make the cutoff between good and mediocre teams? Would a mediocre team be in the tournament or not?
 
Where do you make the cutoff between good and mediocre teams? Would a mediocre team be in the tournament or not?

You really don't have to be "good" to make the tourney anymore. Iowa almost got in 2013-14 and were a Tennessee win away from getting in and they were not good
 
I've been saying this for 2 months. Nebraska is not good.

Wonder if they could have used MJ last night. :)

They actually seem to have some good players at different spots, and their home atmosphere looks tough, but results are results...and it's not because they're not Iowa State either.
 
You really don't have to be "good" to make the tourney anymore. Iowa almost got in 2013-14 and were a Tennessee win away from getting in and they were not good

Got it, so most of Johnny Orr's teams weren't good by your standards.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Help Support Us

Become a patron