Well the bye was the week before.
Oh duh, I didn't see a second of the Iowa game last weekend so that's why
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well the bye was the week before.
I asked, because when the richardson versus Beathard was discussed, it is similar to the Purdy versus Stanley situation now. Richarson was a returner who had an ok season and Beathard was a hyped guy who had play about a game. That is why people took Richardson, the known, versus beathard, the unknown.
The thing is you can tell if a QB has that "it factor" or not pretty early IMO. Beathard had that. I would say even Stanzi and Tate had it. It appears Purdy has that as well, I mean the kid knocked off a top 25 team on the road in his first start looking like Baker Mayfield out there but that is still very premature. The one thing we do know is Stanley doesn't have it
Stanley just isn't consistent. He has "it" sometimes. We will see if Purdy has "it" consistently or not.
Some intelligence is involved and obviously these clowns are lacking in that department.It's painful to read. Trolling is an art, this is like watching a toddler try to color in between the lines
If by "it" you mean a pizza ranch craving, then yes Stanley has it.The thing is you can tell if a QB has that "it factor" or not pretty early IMO. Beathard had that. I would say even Stanzi and Tate had it. It appears Purdy has that as well, I mean the kid knocked off a top 25 team on the road in his first start looking like Baker Mayfield out there but that is still very premature. The one thing we do know is Stanley doesn't have it
Agree to disagree. He has all the tools but I don't think he has any of the X factor to be a good to great QB
He is capable of having "it", just needs to be consistent with it, which he hasn't shown he can do yet. Still not a bad QB by any means and he is pretty good. But he has a ways to go to be great.
I wouldn't say a middle of the road Big Ten QB is "pretty good" but to each their own
He is capable of having "it", just needs to be consistent with it, which he hasn't shown he can do yet. Still not a bad QB by any means and he is pretty good. But he has a ways to go to be great.
You either have it or you don’t. Not something you can sometimes have. If it is inconsistent, then they don’t have it.
Bingo. Iowa's had QB's that had it previously, they don't have one now that has it
Bingo. Iowa's had QB's that had it previously, they don't have one now that has it
Seems like you can't judge QB's at all. Obviously Richardson and Lanning didn't have "it" and CJ did. You were wrong about all 3 of them.
Stanley is a good QB and will be drafted after his Sr. year. His Comp. % is up 6% over last year. His Yards per attempt are up 1.3 Yard from last year. He is on pace to increase his total yards by nearly 600 over last year as well.
We know how stubborn kirk is with QBs so if I were an iowa fan I'd be worried. Not sure why mansell hasn't had some meaningful snaps? Oh well I guess something's never change.
Q. The four guys that were suspended, you mentioned you might have them doing something different this week. What was kind of the -- what did you have them doing instead of playing in the game?If by "it" you mean a pizza ranch craving, then yes Stanley has it.
I hope he doesn't
ISU QBs are like 'Spinal Tap' drummers.
Let's just hope the Purdy kid makes it through ok.