Biggest disadvantage in the CyHawk Series since 1980

Kempt vs Stanley: Can go either way. Gonna be split down party lines. Kempt better numbers, but Stanley has more potential. Can Stanley realize that potential, can Kempt show improved "arm strength?" (hint; most of what he gets chastised for was throws into wind when he had a wounded shoulder)

TE clearly Iowa
OL Iowa, probably not as strong as you think
DL probably Iowa but not clearly. Wait and see on that one...
LB probably ISU
Secondary narrowly ISU. Just based on returning talent.

Of course, none of that really matters. The TE's don't line up against each other...

Seems well reasoned, I disagree a bit, but overall it is sound.
 
So you think Rudock was a better college QB than Banks. That's incredibly dumb but hey you're entitled to your opinion

They were both good. They played 12 years apart. we might has well debate Joe Namath vs Tom Brady.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: CyTwins
It is pretty simple. The NFL is gonna draft the more TALENTED player. In college or HS kids can rack up STATS in a system, that doesn't make them talented. Heck I even said that happens with Iowa and RB, it happens with QB's in college all the time. Stanley clearly has an NFL arm and talent, Kempt doesn't.

I actually disagree. From a "number of players drafted" standpoint, I think Iowa players get more benefit of the doubt because they are one of a handful of schools left that still run a pro style offense. This is exactly why the so called experts are so high on Stanley. Don't get me wrong, Iowa has had some really good players come through the system but there are a lot of good ones that never even get a shot. Iowa absolutely benefits from the system they run.
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron