All Iowa Football Team---Post Bowl Edition

Are you McShay? Have you asked McShay how much Stanley film he has watched?

If you answer no to both of those, it is not a fact.

He can't grasp this concept. It's like talking to a toddler

Do you realize how dumb of a response this is? By your logic, we could never trust anything McShay ever says, because we would never know how much film he has watched on a particular player unless he explicitly told us.
 
Stanley seems like a good kid and I wish him well but hok fans need to pump the brakes. Mcshay putting him on that list could be the kiss of death as we've seen many QBs regress under ferents
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CyTwins
Do you realize how dumb of a response this is? By your logic, we could never trust anything McShay ever says, because we would never know how much film he has watched on a particular player unless he explicitly told us.

You're the one saying it's a fact McShay has watched quite a bit of film on Fat Stanley, not us
 
He probably watched a half against Illinois and a minutes worth of highlights.
Benji seems to think the end-all-be-all of QB skill is arm strength when combined with a hawkeye jersey.

Tom Brady has one of the weakest arms in the NFL, therefore by benji's logic Brady isn't very good.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: benjimill
You're the one saying it's a fact McShay has watched quite a bit of film on Fat Stanley, not us

McShay’s evaluation on Stanley:

He has great size and arm strength and is mobile in the pocket. His accuracy is better than his completion percentage suggests. He still needs to work on his ball placement and timing to reach his potential.

McShay’s evaluation on Leidner:

He has good size and can make plays with his feet. He has upside as a passer.

If you can’t tell the difference in specificity between the two evaluations, I don’t know what to tell you.
 
Benji seems to think the end-all-be-all of QB skill is arm strength when combined with a hawkeye jersey.

Tom Brady has one of the weakest arms in the NFL, therefore by benji's logic Brady isn't very good.

He also thinks Brady is a twig
 
McShay’s evaluation on Stanley:

He has great size and arm strength and is mobile in the pocket. His accuracy is better than his completion percentage suggests. He still needs to work on his ball placement and timing to reach his potential.

McShay’s evaluation on Leidner:

He has good size and can make plays with his feet. He has upside as a passer.

If you can’t tell the difference in specificity between the two evaluations, I don’t know what to tell you.

He said Leidner has upside as a passer and has shown the ability to make plays with his legs without even watching film on him. Derp
 
He said Leidner has upside as a passer and has shown the ability to make plays with his legs without even watching film on him. Derp

Please reconcile the differences in specificity between the two evaluations and tell me how McShay could have such an accurate and somewhat thorough understanding of Stanley’s strengths and weaknesses without watching any film on him. TIA.
 
Please reconcile the differences in specificity between the two evaluations and tell me how McShay could have such an accurate and somewhat thorough understanding of Stanley’s strengths and weaknesses without watching any film on him. TIA.

McShay talks like he watched film on Leidner when he hadn't just like he's talking like he watched film on Stanley when nobody knows if he has. The only thing we know (or fact in your words) for sure is McShay has admitted putting out early mock drafts without watching film on the players
 
  • Funny
Reactions: benjimill
There are two facts being discussed now:

Kempt was better than Stanley last year
Nobody has a clue what players McShay has actually watched film on or not

Everything else is just an opinion
 
Please reconcile the differences in specificity between the two evaluations and tell me how McShay could have such an accurate and somewhat thorough understanding of Stanley’s strengths and weaknesses without watching any film on him. TIA.

Where did McShay have Dez King between his junior and senior seasons?

You might want to just create another alt, at this point benjimill isn't even repairable.
 
McShay talks like he watched film on Leidner when he hadn't just like he's talking like he watched film on Stanley when nobody knows if he has. The only thing we know (or fact in your words) for sure is McShay has admitted putting out early mock drafts without watching film on the players

McShay says in the article that the evaluations were the result of “a summer of pounding tape.”

Derp.
 
McShay’s evaluation on Stanley:
He has great size and arm strength and is mobile in the pocket. His accuracy is better than his completion percentage suggests. He still needs to work on his ball placement and timing to reach his potential.
Stanley -2.3 yards per run 5 fumbles lost
 
  • Winner
Reactions: CyTwins
Do you realize how dumb of a response this is? By your logic, we could never trust anything McShay ever says, because we would never know how much film he has watched on a particular player unless he explicitly told us.

Good word you are dense. Now you are saying the definition of a fact is dumb?

Never once did I question his analysis. Only your claim of a fact.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CyTwins

Help Support Us

Become a patron