He probably watched a half against Illinois and a minutes worth of highlights.Are you McShay? Have you asked McShay how much Stanley film he has watched?
If you answer no to either of those, it is not a fact.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He probably watched a half against Illinois and a minutes worth of highlights.Are you McShay? Have you asked McShay how much Stanley film he has watched?
If you answer no to either of those, it is not a fact.
Are you McShay? Have you asked McShay how much Stanley film he has watched?
If you answer no to both of those, it is not a fact.
He can't grasp this concept. It's like talking to a toddler
Do you realize how dumb of a response this is? By your logic, we could never trust anything McShay ever says, because we would never know how much film he has watched on a particular player unless he explicitly told us.
Benji seems to think the end-all-be-all of QB skill is arm strength when combined with a hawkeye jersey.He probably watched a half against Illinois and a minutes worth of highlights.
You're the one saying it's a fact McShay has watched quite a bit of film on Fat Stanley, not us
Benji seems to think the end-all-be-all of QB skill is arm strength when combined with a hawkeye jersey.
Tom Brady has one of the weakest arms in the NFL, therefore by benji's logic Brady isn't very good.
McShay’s evaluation on Stanley:
He has great size and arm strength and is mobile in the pocket. His accuracy is better than his completion percentage suggests. He still needs to work on his ball placement and timing to reach his potential.
McShay’s evaluation on Leidner:
He has good size and can make plays with his feet. He has upside as a passer.
If you can’t tell the difference in specificity between the two evaluations, I don’t know what to tell you.
He said Leidner has upside as a passer and has shown the ability to make plays with his legs without even watching film on him. Derp
Please reconcile the differences in specificity between the two evaluations and tell me how McShay could have such an accurate and somewhat thorough understanding of Stanley’s strengths and weaknesses without watching any film on him. TIA.
Please reconcile the differences in specificity between the two evaluations and tell me how McShay could have such an accurate and somewhat thorough understanding of Stanley’s strengths and weaknesses without watching any film on him. TIA.
McShay talks like he watched film on Leidner when he hadn't just like he's talking like he watched film on Stanley when nobody knows if he has. The only thing we know (or fact in your words) for sure is McShay has admitted putting out early mock drafts without watching film on the players
McShay says in the article that the evaluations were the result of “a summer of pounding tape.”
Derp.
Stanley -2.3 yards per run 5 fumbles lostMcShay’s evaluation on Stanley:
He has great size and arm strength and is mobile in the pocket. His accuracy is better than his completion percentage suggests. He still needs to work on his ball placement and timing to reach his potential.
McShay says in the article that the evaluations were the result of Stanley's “ summer of pounding Pizza Ranch.”
Derp.
Do you realize how dumb of a response this is? By your logic, we could never trust anything McShay ever says, because we would never know how much film he has watched on a particular player unless he explicitly told us.
]
What the hell is "pounding tape"?