My Pledge—No More Trolling

Kempt is better at everything and Lard is better at defense and rebounding. Those are your statistical facts

LOL at Kempt is better at everything.

Kempt's Arm:

China-s-top-noodle-maker-in-food-safety-soup.jpg


Stanley's Arm:

upload_2018-4-13_16-35-12.jpeg
 
The difference between Garza and Lard's O rating is much larger in favor of Garza than their difference in D rating in favor of Lard.

And dont act like ISU basketball was some defensive juggernaut this season.

For those of you at home just tuning in, you’ve gone from Stanley is better than Kempt, to Garza is better than Lard to ISU wasn’t a defensive juggernaut.

But you’re not going to troll anymore.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: CyTwins
For those of you at home just tuning in, you’ve gone from Stanley is better than Kempt, to Garza is better than Lard to ISU wasn’t a defensive juggernaut.

But you’re not going to troll anymore.
Forgot calling Iowa Big Time to never calling Iowa Big Time.
 
Much better arm strength for sure.

Threw for more TD's than Kempt and had a worse WR crew.

Neither are very mobile.

Both are good decision makers judging by their low number of INT's.

Its close, slight edge to Stanley.

So he's better at overthrowing receivers and throwing uncatchable balls and both averaged 2 TD's per game so actually he's not better at anything
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: breck53
Doesn't matter if you can't hit a receiver and or fumble all the time. Take the weekend off you are in full troll mode now.

I can name 100 NFL QBs that had more arm strength than Peyton Manning. When you don't know how to throw accurately or hold on to the ball it doesn't matter
 
So he's better at overthrowing receivers and throwing uncatchable balls and both averaged 2 TD's per game so actually he's not better at anything

Actually Stanley threw a TD about every 15 pass attempts and Kempt threw one about every 16 pass attempts. And again, Kempt had a much better WR crew to throw to and played a weaker schedule.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: breck53
Actually Stanley threw a TD about every 15 pass attempts and Kempt threw one about every 16 pass attempts. And again, Kempt had a much better WR crew to throw to and played a weaker schedule.[/QUOTE]
.


OMFG. You are the biggest homer/moron.
 
Actually Stanley threw a TD about every 15 pass attempts and Kempt threw one about every 16 pass attempts. And again, Kempt had a much better WR crew to throw to and played a weaker schedule.

Who's fault is it Kempt had a better WR crew? I'm guessing Kempt had a better OL pass blocking for him too right?
 
Iowa was 116th out of 129 teams in total offense...

I was at the game when they had like 60 yards at Wisconsin. It was just after their beatdown of Ohio State so prime proof that the OSU game was an outlier.

Cue 'But, but Nebraska game!'.

I had a Hawkdom friend over Thanksgiving ***** about how they didn't continue to use the TE--they tried to get that going vs. Wisky. Wisky just defended it.
 
Actually Stanley threw a TD about every 15 pass attempts and Kempt threw one about every 16 pass attempts. And again, Kempt had a much better WR crew to throw to and played a weaker schedule.

Overall strength of schedule is meaningless for this stat.

For instance; and this has NOTHING TO DO WITH EITHER STANLEY vs KEMPT, or Iowa vs ISU, or Cats vs Dogs:

  • QB 1 could throw 7td passes against their lowest rated opponent and zero vs their highest rated opponent. It would average to 3.5 td.
  • QB 2 could throw 3td vs their lowest rated opponent and 3td vs their highest rated opponent. It would average to 3td per game.

Which QB was better?
 

Help Support Us

Become a patron