Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm definitely not debating that they have a terrible schedule.
I am debating that a 13-5 P5 school gets left out. I have a very hard time seeing the committee do that. (FWIW I don't think Nebraska is NCAA tourney good).
I figured you were better than the conference strength argument that most Clone fans resort to when ISU is down in football or basketball....guess not.
Just makes you wonder how much we would beat up on the teams in your weak conference is all
Nebby plays 1 game each against the top 4 teams (other than Nebby)...1 win against Michigan, the #5 team in the BIG. They play two games each against the bottom feeders (4 of the 5 bottom teams). They likely will get a double bye in the BIG tourney...then play the #5, likely Michigan. What happens when they lose that...I doubt it but take a look at Nebraska's 10 conference wins.
Top 50 RPI: 1
Top 50-100 RPI: 1
Top 100-150 RPI: 5
Top 150-200 RPI: 1
Top 200+ RPI: 2
8 of their 10 wins are outside the RPI top 100. ISU has twice as many top 100 RPI wins as Nebraska. Their conference schedule is one of the worst P5 schedules in the country.
Well, it is pretty tough having to play every school in the conference in each sport (and twice for basketball).This sounds just like every football season for ISU. But but but if we were in the B1G.
Well, it is pretty tough having to play every school in the conference in each sport (and twice for basketball).
Having the odd-ball years of getting to avoid OU, WVU, OSU, TCU, etc. would be nice.
This sounds just like every football season for ISU. But but but if we were in the B1G.
It is fact that ISU plays every conference team, not excuse.I really didnt expect you to be an excuse maker like @CyTwins and a huge portion of the ISU fan base.
This is disappointing.
It is fact that ISU plays every conference team, not excuse.
Its an excuse.
Look pal, there is one instate program alone in last place in their conference and it isnt the squad from Iowa City.
Look pal, there is one instate program that plays in a conference with 4 schools with under .500 record, and it isn't the squad from Ames.Its an excuse.
Look pal, there is one instate program alone in last place in their conference and it isnt the squad from Iowa City.
Its an excuse.
Look pal, there is one instate program alone in last place in their conference and it isnt the squad from Iowa City.
I really didnt expect you to be an excuse maker like @CyTwins and a huge portion of the ISU fan base.
This is disappointing.
Look pal, there is one instate program that plays in a conference with 4 schools with under .500 record, and it isn't the squad from Ames.
Now now.There it is again....but but but if ISU was in the B1G.
I really thought you were better than this.
Look pal, there is one instate program that plays in a conference with 4 schools with under .500 record, and it isn't the squad from Ames.
Now now.
I don't think I made any claim that ISU would have a better record if they were in the Big Ten.
The post above is implying that the Big Ten is, well, not good?Then what is the above post implying?
What happened to regional power house? Or team that had too much talents? Or the team was going to be no worse than 29-5 according to DanL53 aka Yeabuddy?Now now.
I don't think I made any claim that ISU would have a better record if they were in the Big Ten.
But with that being said, it's kinda funny how the Sagarin/Kenpom/RPI is nice to use except for when it roasts your argument.