Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You have to wonder if he has an addiction to pain pills.
You have to wonder if he has an addiction to pain pills.
Why? Unless tests show different, reports show he had one pain killer in his system.
Sure, he could be addicted to them, but there's hasn't been anything that makes you wonder about addiction.
Where have you seen this? He admitted he was on 3 different prescribed pain killers, as well as a 4th pain killer that was pulled off the market over a decade ago. Also, one of the prescribed pain killers was Vicodin, which is highly addictive. Lastly, he admitted in his statement to the press that he had a reaction to a mix of drugs, so that would lend me to believe he had more than one in his system.
What were the drugs you saw he was on? He had back surgery a month ago. A couple NSAIDs and a pain killer aren't some sign of pain killer addiction. This is just another case of everyone wanting to make something that happened much bigger and deeper than it actually is for reasons unknown to me. If the guy was addicted to pain killers he would have been able to go more than 10 minutes standing up before the last surgery. There's no evidence and it's just an attempt to make the failure of Tiger Woods even bigger and "better."
Woods told police he was taking several medications. An officer listed them as “soloxex,” “vicodin,” “torix” and “viox,” the latter of which he had not taken this year.
Torix and vioxx are anti-inflammatory medications. Vicodin is a pain medication.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/c...jupiter-report-states/MlL0LPoV7rL6uNtOBh87xI/
Vioxx is the drug that has been off the market for 13 years. The fact that he had access to a drug that is illegal tells you there may be an issue, at least it does for me.
Easy killer, I'm a huge Tiger fan.
That being said, falls from greatness shouldn't be who did the worst thing to fall back down, but how high they were at one point and how far they fell. Not really what caused them to fall.
And for the record, I'll stand up for Lance Armstrong too. 99% of the cyclists on Tour were doing the same things Lance was. He was just the one under a microscope because he was always winning. Call it cheating or whatever, but he was also beating other cheaters.
To each their own. There was also some suspicion with pain killer addiction with the incident in 2009 where his wife handed the police empty bottles of Vicodin and Ambien. Im not saying he is an addict at all, because I have no idea and that would be unfair to just assume he was. But the suspicion is obviously present.Like I said, one pain killer and it was the only approved drug. Forgive me for not lumping NSAIDs in as pain killers, since they aren't.
No, it doesn't indicate there's an addiction problem. It indicates he's a professional athlete that can get his hands on what he wants. Vioxx was a very effective drug.
Why? Unless tests show different, reports show he had one pain killer in his system.
Sure, he could be addicted to them, but there's hasn't been anything that makes you wonder about addiction.
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/c...jupiter-report-states/MlL0LPoV7rL6uNtOBh87xI/
Vioxx is the drug that has been off the market for 13 years. The fact that he had access to a drug that is illegal tells you there may be an issue, at least it does for me.
Would be a good debate vs Lance Armstrong, OJ, Joe Paterno, and Oscar Pistorius.
IMO it would have to be between Simpson and Paterno, and since Simpson actually slaughtered two people, lied about it, and celebrated his innocence (while rubbing the victims' families faces in it as well), it's no contest.
Man, are you on Tiger's payroll or something?
Paterno definitely has the "fastest" fall from grace, though. Going from winningest D1 coach to the child rape scandal to dying all within 2 months.IMO it would have to be between Simpson and Paterno, and since Simpson actually slaughtered two people, lied about it, and celebrated his innocence (while rubbing the victims' families faces in it as well), it's no contest.
IMO it would have to be between Simpson and Paterno, and since Simpson actually slaughtered two people, lied about it, and celebrated his innocence (while rubbing the victims' families faces in it as well), it's no contest.
Yet another situation where all DUIs aren't necessarily the same. i don't know if he had any clue what would happen when he took the drugs when he did but the intent here isn't the same as drunk driving at all. I'm not saying he should just get off either but this being treated like a guy who blows .25 doesn't seem right to me.
Yet another situation where all DUIs aren't necessarily the same. i don't know if he had any clue what would happen when he took the drugs when he did but the intent here isn't the same as drunk driving at all. I'm not saying he should just get off either but this being treated like a guy who blows .25 doesn't seem right to me.