It is like some of you don't thing there is basketball outside of the Big12. I also can't believe you all don't understand the committee looks at each team independent of conference, it isn't all the same, even
In a round robin setup.
Baylor played 8 conference teams
With a top 50 RPI. And 13 against top 100 RPI. Conference SOS #39
Iowa played 8 conference teams with a top 50 RPI and 14 vs top 100 RPI. Conference SOS #50
Michigan played 10 conference teams with top 50 RPI and 18 vs top 100 RPI. Conference SOS #30
West Virginia conference SOS #48
Kansas Conference SOS #49
ISU conference SOS #22
The committee looks are each resume independent. Other "weaker" conferences face tougher schedules as they are unbalanced.
The only thing unbalanced schedules do is create confusion on who is actually good in a league. These conferences like the ACC and Big 10 have manipulated this perfectly to get as many teams in the tourney as possible.
I mean, who honestly knows who the best team in the Big 10 is this year? Purdue? Wisconsin? Michigan? The 8th place team won the tourney.
In conferences like the Big East and Big 12 there is a clear cut line on which teams are good.