I understand that, their conference SOS had to be a joke, playing an unbalanced schedule in a league that bad. I guess you can give them 2 of the Florida wins as the reason they got in over Iowa, a 9 seed is way too high though.
Seemingly never ending Iowa MBB thread (still going.....)
- Thread starter BeachAve
- Start date
- Status
I understand that, their conference SOS had to be a joke, playing an unbalanced schedule in a league that bad. I guess you can give them 2 of the Florida wins as the reason they got in over Iowa, a 9 seed is way too high though.
Or that the Big 12 was 6-1 against the ACC? They must be garbage.
Barely, the Florida road win and tournament win are the only thing different, aside from the SOS argument, which to me doesn't make any sense if you cant beat anybody.
247 Composite still ranks him higher than Lewis... Lewis must be garbage.
Connor didn't wan an award, but he's better than a commit ISU fans have been drooling over the past year. You can't see the irony?
When you are picking nits at the last few teams, you really don't have an arguement. The committee obviously thought Vandy was way better than a bubble team and also felt Iowa wasn't deserving. Bottom line is win more games, don't be on the bubble. I got no problems with Iowa being left out.
Lewis will be a solid player. I'm only drooling over Wigginton, the guy that will be dribbling in circles around Jorbo next year.
Nobody is really drooling over Lewis, I haven't heard much about him on here honestly. People are drooling over Wiggington though. The thing is, Connor is the crown jewel of your class that you are comparing to our 2nd best recruit. That doesn't look good for Iowa.
Vandy was clearly in according to the committee, I don't have any issues with that.
You don't have any issues with 15 losses? I do, and that Illinois State coach does also.
I thought Fran had the border locked down, how does Mr. Basketball go to Upper Iowa instead of play for Fran?
D
Deleted member 8507
Guest
Top four for each conference (post conference tourneys):
ACC: 5, 6, 7, 14 Avg: 8.0 Conf Avg: 59.60 Worst: 219
Big East: 1, 15, 26, 37 Avg: 19.75 Conf Avg: 72.30 Worst: 236
Big 12: 3, 11, 21, 24 Avg: 14.75 Conf Avg: 67.40 Worst: 171
Big Ten: 19, 20, 25, 34: Avg: 24.5 Conf Avg: 66.43 Worst: 172
SEC: 4, 10, 28, 38 Avg: 20.0 Conf Avg: 86.78 Worst: 255
PAC12: 2, 9, 16, 41 Avg: 17.0 Conf Avg: 98.42 Worst: 281
So looking at the entire season, the top teams in order are
ACC, Big12, PAC12, Big East, SEC, Big Ten
Total conference is
ACC, Big Ten, Big12, Big East, SEC, PAC12
Goes to show that the Big 12 and Big Ten do not have the very low bottoms of the other leagues but the Big 12 better top teams would put it above the Big Ten when looking at the conference as a whole. Big Ten top teams are mediocre at best but their worst teams are only below mediocre not scraping bottom of barrel bad as in other leagues.
To be fair, CyTwins and 1976 do the same exact thing when it comes to football.
No Hawk fans are drooling over Connor, he is a walk on.
I am super excited about Weiscamp, he's gonna be a stud, same with Patrick.
- Status